26.12.2013 Views

14:14, 13 October 2012 - Monoskop

14:14, 13 October 2012 - Monoskop

14:14, 13 October 2012 - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 Harun Farocki<br />

a concept could be arrived at through visual perception (viewing), and that what is<br />

understandable could be made visible. When film was finally discovered, science<br />

was beyond the imaginable (the presentable). He who tries to imagine the theory of<br />

relativity suffers from misconceptions.<br />

Harun Farocki<br />

What seems especially regrettable about the absence of Farocki’s two 35-millimeter<br />

films – Before Your Eyes – Vietnam (1981) and Betrayed (1985) – from<br />

the Chicago retrospective is that, judging from the eight Farocki films I have<br />

seen, his recent work is much more interesting and complex than his early<br />

shorts. While the early shorts aren’t devoid of interest, they bear heavy traces<br />

of Godard’s and Straub-Huillet’s influence and show relatively few signs of either<br />

the intellectual density of As You See and Images of the World and the<br />

Inscription of War (1989) or the conceptual clarity of The Taste of Life<br />

(1979), An Image (1983), and How to Live in the Federal Republic of Germany<br />

(1990). (Apparently his first feature, Between Two Wars – Vietnam, an<br />

essay film completed in 1977 , escapes some of these strictures.) The Words of<br />

the Chairman (1967), Inextinguishable Fire (1969), and The Division of<br />

All Days (1970) are all black-and-white shorts concerned with issues of representation<br />

in relation to political subjects. The first, only two minutes long and<br />

narrated by fellow German independent Helke Sander, is a rather jokey reflection<br />

on the then-current state of Maoism, made the same year as Godard’s La<br />

Chinoise and oriented around the notion that Chairman Mao’s words may<br />

become weapons, but they exist only on paper.<br />

Inextinguishable Fire offers a minimalist but precise 22 minutes on the<br />

subject of the manufacture and effects of napalm – a salutary subject at the<br />

present moment, especially when Francis Coppola’s and Oliver Stone’s morally<br />

anguished beads of sweat in Apocalypse Now and Platoon are deemed<br />

to be of far greater historical importance. A chilling moment occurs near the<br />

beginning of the film: a man is monotonically reading the testimony of a Vietnamese<br />

victim when he suddenly extinguishes a cigarette on the back of his<br />

hand. He then calmly explains that the temperature of napalm is seven and a<br />

half times greater than the temperature of that lit cigarette (see ill. 1). Most of<br />

the remainder of the film is informative but anticlimactic.<br />

The 40-minute The Division of All Days – a dry Marxist analysis of capitalist<br />

exploitation with occasional sarcastic asides, co-written and co-directed<br />

by Hartmut Bitomsky – is the least interesting Farocki film I’ve seen. Unless I<br />

missed something, I’m afraid that adjectives such as ‘dour’ and ‘pedantic’ that<br />

have been applied unjustly to his subsequent works are more to the point here.<br />

In striking contrast, The Taste of Life, a half-hour colour documentary made<br />

the same year, is the most lyrical and ‘open’ of all the Farocki films I’ve seen. A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!