26.12.2013 Views

14:14, 13 October 2012 - Monoskop

14:14, 13 October 2012 - Monoskop

14:14, 13 October 2012 - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Painting Pavements 47<br />

The Trouble with Television<br />

Farocki’s films can be read as an ongoing analysis of his distrust of the technological<br />

image. He has always had a tendency to use visual material belonging to<br />

others and to reinterpret it. Initially, he quoted other films, weaving them into<br />

his own line of argument as evidence. What he had in mind was to teach the audience<br />

to look and listen closely. He still had faith in the enlightening effect of his<br />

own work. It was not until Etwas wird sichtbar that he reached the point<br />

where he began to distrust even his own images (and thereby the potency of the<br />

visual media altogether). At first he traced this distrust to the abuse made of images<br />

by others, above all, by television journalists. The aim was to expose their<br />

machinations. The WDR (West German Broadcasting) offered him a platform<br />

for this. In 1973,fortheseriesTelekritik (tele-criticism), Farocki made Der Ärger<br />

mit den Bildern (The Trouble with Images), a critical meta-film in which he<br />

settled scores with the television news feature as a format, by pointing out the<br />

systematic overuse of meaningless images. For the first time Farocki made do<br />

entirely with material not shot by himself. (In Die Sprache der Revolution<br />

[The Language of Revolution], a collage of film excerpts from various sources<br />

made the year before, Farocki still managed to insert into his argument a couple<br />

of brief, staged sequences that he directed himself.) The Trouble with Images<br />

pursued a precise didactic concept, and for that reason it ended up very wordy.<br />

But because there was more spoken text than visual material to clinch his argument<br />

(and because the text was supposed to propel the analysis), Farocki faced a<br />

problem. How could he visually illustrate a spoken text without practising precisely<br />

what he was preaching against, the cancelling out of a critical commentary<br />

by levelling it with arbitrary images? He decided on a principled refusal of<br />

images. Spacing the paragraphs that constituted the line of his argument, he<br />

spliced in black leader. This nod in the direction of experimental cinema shows<br />

signs of the director’s own disorientation, an admission of his own impotence in<br />

the face of the superior power of the images senselessly churned out day in day<br />

out by the television machine.<br />

In the 1970s, he produced other films for the WDR that criticised the media,<br />

like Moderatoren im Fernsehen (TV Anchormen) orDie Arbeit mit den<br />

Bildern (Working with Images), both made in 1974. But the easier it was for<br />

Farocki to expose the mechanisms that led to the thoughtless use of images on<br />

television, the harder it was for him to find the right approach to his own. In<br />

Between Two Wars, completed in 1978, after he had worked on it for years as<br />

his own producer and facing constant interruptions, the poverty of images is<br />

carried to the limit of what is considered bearable. No doubt the sparseness of<br />

the film was due to a lack of finances, but Farocki managed to raise reticence to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!