26.12.2013 Views

Congenital malformations - Edocr

Congenital malformations - Edocr

Congenital malformations - Edocr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 PART I GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

could suggest the possibility of a chromosome<br />

abnormality in the family and to any history of<br />

consanguinity which would suggest the possibility<br />

of an autosomal recessive disorder. Minor<br />

dysmorphic features or unusual characteristics<br />

can at times represent benign familial characteristics<br />

so examination of the parents for such<br />

features, or simply asking the parents about<br />

these findings, can be helpful in sorting out their<br />

significance. Some caution should be used in<br />

assuming the fact that a dysmorphic infant resembles<br />

a parent is always reassuring, since<br />

many dysmorphic syndromes are dominantly<br />

inherited and a parent may be unaware that he<br />

or she is affected. A classic example of this is<br />

Noonan syndrome. An undiagnosed parent may<br />

be short with a broad neck and low set ears but<br />

no significant medical problems, yet can give<br />

birth to a child with much more serious concerns<br />

such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.<br />

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION<br />

In an infant who is noted to have a congenital<br />

malformation, either major or minor, a detailed<br />

physical examination is critical to determine if<br />

there are additional anomalies. The significance<br />

of multiple <strong>malformations</strong> is clearly different<br />

from that of a single isolated malformation. The<br />

examination should begin with careful measurements<br />

of length, weight, and head circumference<br />

since findings of intrauterine growth retardation<br />

(IUGR), microcephaly, or macrocephaly<br />

could be of great significance. Efforts should be<br />

made to systematically assess facial features and<br />

all other organ systems. If dysmorphic features<br />

are noted, they should be described as precisely<br />

as possible. In circumstances in which structures<br />

appear abnormally large or small, graphs<br />

or charts representing a compilation of normative<br />

data are often available against which individual<br />

measurements can be compared 1,2 so obtaining<br />

measurements may be desirable.<br />

Special mention should be made of the significance<br />

of minor anomalies, usually defined as<br />

dysmorphic features or unusual findings of minimal<br />

or no functional or cosmetic significance. Examples<br />

of minor anomalies are seen in Figs. 2-1<br />

to 2-5. A single minor anomaly is found in approximately<br />

14% of all newborns and is not associated<br />

with an increased risk of associated major<br />

Figure 2-1.<br />

Inner epicanthal folds, in this case in a patient with Down syndrome.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!