MUNZSSInlD - usaid
MUNZSSInlD - usaid
MUNZSSInlD - usaid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 5 <br />
environment so that the expected benefits of development objectives can be<br />
weighed against any adverse impacts upon the human environment or any<br />
irreversible or Irretrievable commitment of resources" (22 CFR 216.6(a)). The<br />
underlying purpose of this EA is to identify and propose measures to mitigate<br />
potentially significant adverse environmental impacts which may result from<br />
implementation of EXITOS.<br />
Pursuant to 22 CFR 216.6(c)(2), the need to which the Agency is<br />
responding in proposing the alternatives described herein--including<br />
preferred<br />
the<br />
alternative (EXITOS)--is the need to "achieve broad-based,<br />
sustainable economic growth in Central America." This is the second<br />
A.I.D.<br />
of<br />
Latin<br />
three<br />
America/Caribbean (LAC) Bureau Strategic Objectives for Central<br />
America during the decade of the 1990's (USAID/LAC 1991). Specific<br />
Sub-Objectives<br />
Bureau<br />
for the 1990's to which EXITOS will directly contribute are:<br />
(1) Strengthening private sector organizations promoting trade and<br />
investment, and cooperation with other U.S. Government trade and investment<br />
promotion efforts (Strategic Objective 2, Sub-Objective 2);<br />
(2) Stimulating agricultural production and trade through promotion of<br />
technology improvements and agribusiness development, and trade linkages with<br />
U.S. and neighboring markets (Strategic Objective 2, Sub-Objective 5): and<br />
(3) Increasing investment in market information systems and networks,<br />
education and training, and technology development and dissemination<br />
(Strategic Objective 2, Sub-Objective 6).<br />
Pursuant to formal review of ROCAP's fiscal year (FY) 1991-92 Action Plan<br />
in AID/Washington (AID/W) on 2 May 990, ROCAP was given programmatic approval<br />
to design and approve EXITOS. The Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) for<br />
the Project recommended a Positive Threshold Decision (Appendix 1) and,<br />
pursuant to 22 CPR 216.3(a)(4), examined reasonably foreseeable direct and<br />
indirect impacts of EXITOS on the environment.<br />
EXITOS funding is essentially for technical assistance (TA), which<br />
act in<br />
will<br />
an advisory capacity only. Limited funds are earmarked for<br />
NTA<br />
specialised<br />
research, and limited non-pesticide related commodities may be<br />
support<br />
procured<br />
that<br />
to<br />
research. Because EXITOS will almost exclusively fund advisory<br />
TA, no significant direct Project impacts were identified in the<br />
rationale<br />
IEE. The<br />
for the IEE's Positive Determination was that while<br />
will<br />
EXITOS<br />
have<br />
itself<br />
no direct environmental impact of any kind, it may have<br />
adverse<br />
indirect<br />
environmental im-pact by continuing to support NT export activities.<br />
Three potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were<br />
identified in the ZEE which may indirectly result from provision of<br />
promote<br />
TA to<br />
NTA and HTI exports. These three Issues, refined during preparation<br />
of and addressed in this Environmental Assessment (RA), aret (1)<br />
of<br />
the<br />
the<br />
effects<br />
Project on pesticide use; (2) the effects of the Project on conflicting<br />
natural resource demands, especially insofar as land conversion Is concernod<br />
and (3) the effect of the Project on Industrial pollution and waste disposal<br />
problems.