MUNZSSInlD - usaid

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4-1 Selected Economic and Social Data EXITOS Target Countries Eatimted Population Exports to U.S. Population Pop. Growth Real GDP size Exports (00012) (X (Annual change) Rate) Rate X) (X change) (SMittions) Country (000s Non-Tradit. km) 1980 Manufactured 1990 (1989-1990) Vegetal (1990-1995) C1989-1990) (1990) '83-90 '89-90 '83-90 '89-90 '83-90 '89-90 Betize 13 145 191 2.6 nd 6.0 44.0 18.9 Costa -11.4 NIce 51 3.3 -44.7 2246 18.9 2935 -11.4 2.7 2.3 3.6 1006.5 El Salvador 27.7 11.3 21 27.1 4525 Q.6 5252 27.7 11.3 2.2 2.5 2.5 237.5 Guateml 2.9 17.1 109 2.5 6900 17.3 2.9 9192 17.1 2.9 2.9 3.5 790.9 37.6 28.5 48.5 33.0 37.6 28.5 Honduras 112 3546 4696 3.1 3.0 -2.5 486.3 Nicaragua 20.3 23.8 130 23.0 2771 28.4 3870 20.3 23.8 3.3 3.2 -5.7 15.3 12.4 Penama 3.8 13.2 7? 6.3 1956 12.4 2421 3.8 2.1 1.9 3.4 226.6 21.7 15.6 21.6 15.7 21.7 15.6 Source: Country Size date from Espenshad (1982) and tURD (1985); All other data from A.I.D. (1991). 12a %
- 13 - Population size ranges from 0.19 million (Belize) population to 9.19 million density (Guatemala); from 14.7/km2 (Belize) to 250/km2 population (El Salvador); growth rates and from about (Nicaragua). 2 .1%/year (Panama) In general, to 3 . 3 %/year the rate of population growth in all is CA stable countries or declining except El Salvador, and perhaps Belize where reliable statistics are not available (Table 4-1). Population distribution is also highly uneven, countries. both within In and 1985, between the percentage of the urban national ranged populations from 40% that (Honduras) were to 59% (Nicaragua). countries of As the in virtually world, the all trend of rural-urban population migration change is strong. in the Rural first half the 1980s, for 0.2%/yr example, (Panama) ranged to 2 from .4%/yr only (El Salvador), while urban ranged population from 2 .9%/yr change in Panama to 4 .1%/yr in Guatemala (Table 4-2). 4.1.2 Employmentand Land Use Central America employment has historically occurring been in the rural, agricultural with most sector. Ricans In were 1980, agriculturally 29% of Costa employed while 63% Guatemalans of Hondurans remained and 55% employed of in the sector. The agricultural percentage production of land in (cultivation and permanent ranged from range) a low from of 1982-1984, 22.7% in Panama to a high of amount 64.4% of in land El Salvador. under permanent The range is higher than Costa that Rica, under Honduras, cultivation Nicaragua in and Panama, and the Salvador reverse and is Guatemala true in (data El for Belize are not available) (Table 4-2). 4.1.3 Economics and Exports Central American difficulty economies during went through the 1980s a period as a result of severe of civil strife, non market-conducive world market economic changes, policies, and end a range of the of decade, other factors. the (1989-1990) By the GDP varied from to a a high low of of -5.7% 6.0% (Belize).. (Nicaragua) Export growth occurred time. significantly Double digit during annual this growth was averaged for the non-traditional U.S. from all Central exports American to countries from Salvador. 1983-1990, Growth except rates for varied El from 12.4% (Nicaragua) and to El 37.6% Salvador (Guatemala), experienced annual increase during year. this During period the of same 2.5% period, per average annual growth manufactured rates for export products of to the U.S. ranged from 2.5% (Guatemala), (El Salvador) and from to 48.5% 2.9% (El Salvador) to 37.6% (Guatemala) for vegetaL.,es fruits, and plants (Table 4-1). 4.2 THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 4.2.1 Vegetational Systems The ecosystems of Central America can be broadly divided
Page 1 and 2:
UNITED STATES INTERMATION4.DEVELOPM
Page 3 and 4:
PROJECT AUTHORIZATION Name of Count
Page 5 and 6:
MORT INDUSTRY TECHOLOGr SUPPORT PRO
Page 7 and 8:
TAbl of ContentU (continued) Sectio
Page 9 and 10:
Acronyms and Abbreviations ABS A.I
Page 11 and 12:
Project Paper kort Industry Technol
Page 13 and 14:
positive impact on export promotion
Page 15 and 16:
with applied NTA research for regio
Page 17 and 18:
USAID/Honduras has provided assista
Page 19 and 20:
(2) improved agribusiness technolog
Page 21 and 22:
Institutional Develogment of Exnort
Page 23 and 24:
computer and database management sy
Page 25 and 26:
export-oriented organizations and f
Page 27 and 28:
The EXITOS buy-in mechanism will pe
Page 29 and 30:
3.2.9 BvXxlnz One of the intents of
Page 31 and 32:
4.0 COST ESTIMATES AND FIngNC|ILA N
Page 33 and 34:
Tabte 4-1 Stuiary Project Cost Esti
Page 35 and 36:
Tabte 4-4 Methods of Implementation
Page 37 and 38:
5.0 ENW20=TIO P Implementation of E
Page 39 and 40:
scope of work, an illustrative budg
Page 41 and 42:
assistance. The organisa;.ions will
Page 43 and 44:
Table 5-1 Imlementation Schedule (c
Page 45 and 46:
6.0 PBOCURENZNTPLAN 6.1 PROCUREMENT
Page 47 and 48:
6.5 CRAY IIENDWENT CONSIDERAITIONS
Page 49 and 50:
8.0 OLLcZJis S The only significant
Page 51 and 52:
esearch); (2) helping entrepreneur'
Page 53 and 54:
on a regional basis therefore give
Page 55 and 56:
9.4 INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS An Insti
Page 57 and 58:
especially true when conitrasted wi
Page 59 and 60:
upon circumstances. EXITOS will not
Page 61 and 62:
Anexe
Page 63 and 64:
Annex A Project A22roval Su-mary A
Page 65 and 66:
Annex B Loaical Framework
Page 67 and 68:
Page 2 of & Logical Framework EXITO
Page 69 and 70:
Logical Frmework EXITOS: 596-0165 P
Page 71 and 72:
Annex C Statutory Checklist SC(2) -
Page 73 and 74:
(4) If assistance is terminated to
Page 75 and 76:
under Code 941 and which have attai
Page 77 and 78:
5. CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPME
Page 79 and 80:
601(e)): Will the project utilize c
Page 81 and 82:
. Long-range plans (FAA sec. 122(b
Page 83 and 84:
C. CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO ECONOMIC
Page 85 and 86:
.Annex D Technical Analysis 1.0 INT
Page 87 and 88: selections, improved cultural pract
Page 89 and 90: The skillful, energetic, well-targe
Page 91 and 92: PROEXAG COSTA RICA EL SALVADOR GUAT
Page 93 and 94: PROEXAG Chiouita was asked to formu
Page 95 and 96: Annex E Financial Analysis EXITOS i
Page 97 and 98: First, Project financial soundness
Page 99 and 100: Table E-1 Detailed Project Cost Est
Page 101 and 102: Annex F Economic Analysis
Page 103 and 104: TABLE F-1 (100,000 pound 1987 1988
Page 105 and 106: have shown some success. The Japane
Page 107 and 108: Annex G Institutional AnalYsis Grow
Page 109 and 110: Annex H Social Soundness Analysis
Page 111 and 112: have suggested that the expansion o
Page 113 and 114: P1ROEXAG PROEXAG NON-TRADITIONAL AG
Page 115 and 116: ;Y34' Speciaty product -poducts tha
Page 117 and 118: t; • -. . .+ j-j~yt:IMPACJ OF- NT
Page 119 and 120: Interventions to improve working co
Page 121 and 122: Annex I Environmental Assessment
Page 123 and 124: Table of Contents Tab] of Contents
Page 125 and 126: Table of Contents (concluded) Aipen
Page 127 and 128: - 2 - Environmental Assessment Expo
Page 129 and 130: - 4 - Mitigating Measures. Pestici
Page 131 and 132: - 6 - Pursuant to 22 CFR 216.3(a)(4
Page 133 and 134: - 8 3.1.3 Alternative 3: No Acti
Page 135 and 136: - 10 restrictions governing pest
Page 137: - 12 issues may directly affect
Page 141 and 142: - 14 into eight categories: mang
Page 143 and 144: - 16 the quality of the local en
Page 145 and 146: - 18 - Table 5-1 Selected NTAE Cros
Page 147 and 148: - 20 - Still, much remains to be do
Page 149 and 150: - 22 - The extent to which NTAE cro
Page 151 and 152: - 24 generated by the operation;
Page 153 and 154: - 26 many times employ superior
Page 155 and 156: - 28 5.5.2 Natural Resource Use
Page 157 and 158: - 30 - Dr. Wayne Williams served as
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 1 EXITOS Initial Environme
Page 161 and 162: INITIAL EKV1RO ...NT&7,L XJ.NT Expo
Page 163 and 164: violations of U.S. pesticide regula
Page 165 and 166: Appendix 2 EXITOS Environmental Ass
Page 167 and 168: estimates; and (6) prepare an EA as
Page 169 and 170: Appendix 3 I~na StatementAroval Cab
Page 171 and 172: SECTCR ORGANIZATIONS PROMCTI TRADE
Page 173 and 174: TNVIRONM.ENTAL ASSESSMENT, LIGATION
Page 175 and 176: Appendiz 4 Ribliogrgph Ly
Page 177 and 178: Population Reference Bureau (PRB).
Page 179 and 180: Appendix 5 partial List of Contacts
show all

MUNZSSInlD - usaid

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?