29.12.2013 Views

Immunotherapy Safety for the Primary Care ... - U.S. Coast Guard

Immunotherapy Safety for the Primary Care ... - U.S. Coast Guard

Immunotherapy Safety for the Primary Care ... - U.S. Coast Guard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL<br />

VOLUME 120, NUMBER 3<br />

Cox et al S59<br />

as high as 73% of patients, with <strong>the</strong> risk of such reactions<br />

reduced to 27% by premedication in one study. 272 Most<br />

reactions to rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy are not severe, and <strong>the</strong><br />

most common systemic reaction is usually flushing. 273<br />

Systemic reactions with rush schedules have been<br />

reported to occur up to 2 hours after <strong>the</strong> final injection.<br />

For that reason, individuals receiving rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

should remain under physician supervision <strong>for</strong> a<br />

longer waiting period than <strong>the</strong> usual 30 minutes recommended<br />

<strong>for</strong> conventional schedules (eg, 1.5-3 hours on <strong>the</strong><br />

day of allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy extract administration).<br />

Rush protocols <strong>for</strong> administration of Hymenoptera<br />

venom have not been associated with a similarly high<br />

incidence of systemic reactions. 274-276,278,279<br />

Premedication and weekly immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

Summary Statement 50: Premedication can reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

frequency of systemic reactions caused by conventional<br />

immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy. A<br />

There is concern that antihistamines taken be<strong>for</strong>e each<br />

injection with conventional immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy might mask a<br />

minor reaction that would o<strong>the</strong>rwise alert a physician to an<br />

impending systemic reaction. However, one randomized<br />

controlled study demonstrated that premedication reduced<br />

<strong>the</strong> frequency of severe systemic reactions caused by<br />

conventional immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy and increased <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />

of patients who achieved <strong>the</strong> target maintenance dose. 280<br />

One study that compared terfenadine premedication with<br />

placebo premedication during rush VIT demonstrated<br />

greater clinical efficacy in <strong>the</strong> terfenadine-premedicated<br />

group in terms of subsequent responses to field stings or<br />

sting challenge. 281 There was also a significant difference<br />

in <strong>the</strong> systemic reaction rate between <strong>the</strong> 2 groups: 6<br />

patients in <strong>the</strong> placebo-premedicated group had systemic<br />

reactions, whereas none of <strong>the</strong> patients in <strong>the</strong> terfenadinepremedicated<br />

group had systemic reactions (P 5 .012).<br />

Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, patients might still have life-threatening<br />

anaphylaxis despite premedication treatment. Because<br />

many patients might take an antihistamine as part of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

overall allergy management, it is important to determine<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y have taken it on <strong>the</strong> day that <strong>the</strong>y receive<br />

an allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy extract injection. For consistency<br />

in interpretation of reactions, it also might be<br />

desirable that <strong>the</strong>y consistently ei<strong>the</strong>r take <strong>the</strong>ir antihistamine<br />

or avoid it on days when <strong>the</strong>y receive immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r attempts to reduce <strong>the</strong> occurrence of<br />

systemic reactions, such as <strong>the</strong> addition of epinephrine<br />

to <strong>the</strong> allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy extract or use of concomitant<br />

corticosteroids, are not justified and might delay <strong>the</strong><br />

onset of a systemic reaction beyond <strong>the</strong> waiting time when<br />

<strong>the</strong> patient is in <strong>the</strong> physician’s office, thus increasing<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk.<br />

Premedication with cluster and rush<br />

immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

Summary Statement 51: Premedication should be given<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e cluster and rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy with aeroallergens<br />

to reduce <strong>the</strong> rate of systemic reactions. A<br />

Premedication with a nonsedating antihistamine (loratadine)<br />

2 hours be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> first injection of each visit<br />

reduced both <strong>the</strong> number and severity of systemic reactions<br />

during cluster immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy. 267 Premedication<br />

with a 3-day course of prednisone, an H 1 histamine receptor<br />

antagonist, and an H 2 histamine receptor antagonist be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy with inhalant allergens reduced<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk of a systemic reaction from approximately 73% to<br />

27% of patients. 272 In one study designed to investigate<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect of 12 weeks of premedication with a humanized<br />

monoclonal anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) on <strong>the</strong> safety<br />

and efficacy of rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy, <strong>the</strong>re was a 5-fold<br />

decrease in <strong>the</strong> risk of anaphylaxis in <strong>the</strong> group premedicated<br />

with omalizumab compared with <strong>the</strong> placebo premedication<br />

group. 282<br />

There are anecdotal reports of reductions in systemic<br />

reaction rates with <strong>the</strong> addition of a leukotriene receptor<br />

antagonist, but <strong>the</strong>re have been no published studies.<br />

Because <strong>the</strong> risk of a systemic reaction from rush VIT is<br />

relatively low, routine premedication be<strong>for</strong>e rush VIT is<br />

usually unnecessary. 274,276,278,279 In a study evaluating<br />

premedication with antihistamines and steroids <strong>for</strong> rush<br />

immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy with imported fire ant venom, <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

no statistically significant differences in <strong>the</strong> systemic reaction<br />

rates between <strong>the</strong> premedication and placebo premedication<br />

group (3.6% of <strong>the</strong> premedication group vs 6.7% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> placebo group, P 5 .87). 157<br />

Maintenance schedules<br />

Summary Statement 52: Once a patient reaches a<br />

maintenance dose, <strong>the</strong> interval between injections often<br />

can be progressively increased as tolerated up to an<br />

interval of up to 4 weeks <strong>for</strong> inhalant allergens and up to<br />

8 weeks <strong>for</strong> venom. Some individuals might tolerate<br />

longer intervals between maintenance dose injections. A<br />

Once a patient who is receiving inhalant allergen<br />

immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy reaches a maintenance dose, an interval<br />

of 2 to 4 weeks between injections is recommended,<br />

provided clinical improvement is maintained. Some individuals<br />

might tolerate longer intervals between maintenance<br />

dose injections.<br />

The interval between venom injections can be safely<br />

increased up to 8 weeks in some patients without loss of<br />

efficacy. In o<strong>the</strong>r patients, greater efficacy, fewer reactions,<br />

or both might occur with shorter intervals between<br />

injections. There<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> interval between allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

injections should be individualized to provide<br />

<strong>the</strong> greatest efficacy and safety <strong>for</strong> each patient.<br />

Continuing care<br />

Time course of improvement. Summary Statement 53:<br />

Clinical improvement can be demonstrated very shortly<br />

after <strong>the</strong> patient reaches a maintenance dose. A<br />

Clinical improvement can be demonstrated very shortly<br />

after <strong>the</strong> patient reaches a maintenance dose. 24,134,143,277<br />

Improvement might not be observed <strong>for</strong> a number of reasons,<br />

including (1) failure to remove significant allergenic<br />

exposures (eg, a cat), (2) exposure to high levels of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!