Immunotherapy Safety for the Primary Care ... - U.S. Coast Guard
Immunotherapy Safety for the Primary Care ... - U.S. Coast Guard
Immunotherapy Safety for the Primary Care ... - U.S. Coast Guard
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL<br />
VOLUME 120, NUMBER 3<br />
Cox et al S59<br />
as high as 73% of patients, with <strong>the</strong> risk of such reactions<br />
reduced to 27% by premedication in one study. 272 Most<br />
reactions to rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy are not severe, and <strong>the</strong><br />
most common systemic reaction is usually flushing. 273<br />
Systemic reactions with rush schedules have been<br />
reported to occur up to 2 hours after <strong>the</strong> final injection.<br />
For that reason, individuals receiving rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />
should remain under physician supervision <strong>for</strong> a<br />
longer waiting period than <strong>the</strong> usual 30 minutes recommended<br />
<strong>for</strong> conventional schedules (eg, 1.5-3 hours on <strong>the</strong><br />
day of allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy extract administration).<br />
Rush protocols <strong>for</strong> administration of Hymenoptera<br />
venom have not been associated with a similarly high<br />
incidence of systemic reactions. 274-276,278,279<br />
Premedication and weekly immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />
Summary Statement 50: Premedication can reduce <strong>the</strong><br />
frequency of systemic reactions caused by conventional<br />
immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy. A<br />
There is concern that antihistamines taken be<strong>for</strong>e each<br />
injection with conventional immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy might mask a<br />
minor reaction that would o<strong>the</strong>rwise alert a physician to an<br />
impending systemic reaction. However, one randomized<br />
controlled study demonstrated that premedication reduced<br />
<strong>the</strong> frequency of severe systemic reactions caused by<br />
conventional immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy and increased <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />
of patients who achieved <strong>the</strong> target maintenance dose. 280<br />
One study that compared terfenadine premedication with<br />
placebo premedication during rush VIT demonstrated<br />
greater clinical efficacy in <strong>the</strong> terfenadine-premedicated<br />
group in terms of subsequent responses to field stings or<br />
sting challenge. 281 There was also a significant difference<br />
in <strong>the</strong> systemic reaction rate between <strong>the</strong> 2 groups: 6<br />
patients in <strong>the</strong> placebo-premedicated group had systemic<br />
reactions, whereas none of <strong>the</strong> patients in <strong>the</strong> terfenadinepremedicated<br />
group had systemic reactions (P 5 .012).<br />
Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, patients might still have life-threatening<br />
anaphylaxis despite premedication treatment. Because<br />
many patients might take an antihistamine as part of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
overall allergy management, it is important to determine<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y have taken it on <strong>the</strong> day that <strong>the</strong>y receive<br />
an allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy extract injection. For consistency<br />
in interpretation of reactions, it also might be<br />
desirable that <strong>the</strong>y consistently ei<strong>the</strong>r take <strong>the</strong>ir antihistamine<br />
or avoid it on days when <strong>the</strong>y receive immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r attempts to reduce <strong>the</strong> occurrence of<br />
systemic reactions, such as <strong>the</strong> addition of epinephrine<br />
to <strong>the</strong> allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy extract or use of concomitant<br />
corticosteroids, are not justified and might delay <strong>the</strong><br />
onset of a systemic reaction beyond <strong>the</strong> waiting time when<br />
<strong>the</strong> patient is in <strong>the</strong> physician’s office, thus increasing<br />
<strong>the</strong> risk.<br />
Premedication with cluster and rush<br />
immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />
Summary Statement 51: Premedication should be given<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e cluster and rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy with aeroallergens<br />
to reduce <strong>the</strong> rate of systemic reactions. A<br />
Premedication with a nonsedating antihistamine (loratadine)<br />
2 hours be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> first injection of each visit<br />
reduced both <strong>the</strong> number and severity of systemic reactions<br />
during cluster immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy. 267 Premedication<br />
with a 3-day course of prednisone, an H 1 histamine receptor<br />
antagonist, and an H 2 histamine receptor antagonist be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy with inhalant allergens reduced<br />
<strong>the</strong> risk of a systemic reaction from approximately 73% to<br />
27% of patients. 272 In one study designed to investigate<br />
<strong>the</strong> effect of 12 weeks of premedication with a humanized<br />
monoclonal anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) on <strong>the</strong> safety<br />
and efficacy of rush immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy, <strong>the</strong>re was a 5-fold<br />
decrease in <strong>the</strong> risk of anaphylaxis in <strong>the</strong> group premedicated<br />
with omalizumab compared with <strong>the</strong> placebo premedication<br />
group. 282<br />
There are anecdotal reports of reductions in systemic<br />
reaction rates with <strong>the</strong> addition of a leukotriene receptor<br />
antagonist, but <strong>the</strong>re have been no published studies.<br />
Because <strong>the</strong> risk of a systemic reaction from rush VIT is<br />
relatively low, routine premedication be<strong>for</strong>e rush VIT is<br />
usually unnecessary. 274,276,278,279 In a study evaluating<br />
premedication with antihistamines and steroids <strong>for</strong> rush<br />
immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy with imported fire ant venom, <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
no statistically significant differences in <strong>the</strong> systemic reaction<br />
rates between <strong>the</strong> premedication and placebo premedication<br />
group (3.6% of <strong>the</strong> premedication group vs 6.7% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> placebo group, P 5 .87). 157<br />
Maintenance schedules<br />
Summary Statement 52: Once a patient reaches a<br />
maintenance dose, <strong>the</strong> interval between injections often<br />
can be progressively increased as tolerated up to an<br />
interval of up to 4 weeks <strong>for</strong> inhalant allergens and up to<br />
8 weeks <strong>for</strong> venom. Some individuals might tolerate<br />
longer intervals between maintenance dose injections. A<br />
Once a patient who is receiving inhalant allergen<br />
immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy reaches a maintenance dose, an interval<br />
of 2 to 4 weeks between injections is recommended,<br />
provided clinical improvement is maintained. Some individuals<br />
might tolerate longer intervals between maintenance<br />
dose injections.<br />
The interval between venom injections can be safely<br />
increased up to 8 weeks in some patients without loss of<br />
efficacy. In o<strong>the</strong>r patients, greater efficacy, fewer reactions,<br />
or both might occur with shorter intervals between<br />
injections. There<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> interval between allergen immuno<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />
injections should be individualized to provide<br />
<strong>the</strong> greatest efficacy and safety <strong>for</strong> each patient.<br />
Continuing care<br />
Time course of improvement. Summary Statement 53:<br />
Clinical improvement can be demonstrated very shortly<br />
after <strong>the</strong> patient reaches a maintenance dose. A<br />
Clinical improvement can be demonstrated very shortly<br />
after <strong>the</strong> patient reaches a maintenance dose. 24,134,143,277<br />
Improvement might not be observed <strong>for</strong> a number of reasons,<br />
including (1) failure to remove significant allergenic<br />
exposures (eg, a cat), (2) exposure to high levels of