PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hence for small u which is demanded from the smallness of neutrino mass (discussed in<br />
the next section and in Appendix C), ũ will also be of the same order as u unless there<br />
is a cancellation between the terms in the denominator. In this work we will stick to the<br />
possibility of small u and ũ. We will show in the next section that one needs u ∼ 10 −3<br />
GeV to explain the neutrino data. Hence ũ will also have to be 10 −3 GeV. In the u = 0<br />
limit, ũ would also be 0 and this is our usual R-parity conserving scenario.<br />
4.4 Neutralino-Neutrino Mass Matrix<br />
In this section we discuss the consequence of R-parity violation through the neutralinoneutrino<br />
mixing. It is well known [19] that R-parity violation results in mixing between<br />
the neutrino-neutralino states. In our model the neutrino sector is enlarged and includes<br />
both the standard model neutrino ν Li , as well as the heavier neutrino state Σ 0c<br />
R , which<br />
is a component of SU(2) triplet superfield. Since R-parity is violated we get higgsinoneutrino<br />
mixing terms Y Σ √2i<br />
ũ˜H u 0ν L i<br />
and Y Σ √2i<br />
u˜H u 0Σ0c<br />
, in addition to the conventional R-<br />
parity conserving Dirac mass term Y Σ √2i<br />
v u Σ 0c<br />
R ν L i<br />
. The R-parity breaking former two terms<br />
originated from the term Y Σ √2i<br />
ĤuˆΣ 0 0c<br />
Rˆν L i<br />
in Eq. (4.9), once the sneutrino fields ˜ν Li and<br />
˜Σ 0c<br />
R get vacuum expectation values. The third term also has the same origin and it<br />
is the conventional Dirac mass term in type I or type-III seesaw. In addition to the<br />
higgsino-neutrino mixing terms generated from the superpotential W Σ , there would also<br />
be gaugino-neutrino mixing terms generated from the Kähler potential of the ˆL i and ˆΣ c R .<br />
IntheAppendix Bweshowexplicitly thecontributions comingfromW Σ andtheneutrinosneutrino-gaugino<br />
terms originating from the kinetic term of the triplet superfield ˆΣ c R<br />
written down in Eq. (4.10). Here we write the color singlet neutral-fermion mass matrix<br />
of this model in the basis ψ = (˜λ 0 ,˜λ 3 ,˜H 0 d ,˜H 0 u,Σ 0c<br />
R ,ν L 1<br />
,ν L2 ,ν L3 ) T where with one generation<br />
of Σ c R , the neutral fermion mass matrix is a 8×8 matrix. The mass term is given by<br />
R<br />
L n = − 1 2 ψT M n ψ +h.c. (4.34)<br />
where<br />
⎛√ ⎞<br />
2M<br />
1<br />
√ 0 −g ′ v 1 g ′ v 2 0 −g ′ u 1 −g ′ u 2 −g ′ u 3<br />
0 2M<br />
2<br />
gv 1 −gv 2 0 gu 1 gu 2 gu 3<br />
M n = √ 1 −g ′ v 1 gv 1 0 − √ 2µ 0 0 0 0<br />
g ′ v 2 −gv 2 − √ ∑<br />
2µ 0<br />
i<br />
2 Y Σ i<br />
u i Y Σ1 ũ Y Σ2 ũ Y Σ3 ũ<br />
∑<br />
0 0 0<br />
i Y √ Σ i<br />
u i 2M YΣ1 v 2 Y Σ2 v 2 Y Σ3 v 2<br />
(4.35) .<br />
⎜ −g ′ u 1 gu 1 0 Y Σ1 ũ Y Σ1 v 2 0 0 0<br />
⎟<br />
⎝ −g ′ u 2 gu 2 0 Y Σ2 ũ Y Σ2 v 2 0 0 0 ⎠<br />
−g ′ u 3 gu 3 0 Y Σ3 ũ Y Σ3 v 2 0 0 0<br />
97