07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hence for small u which is demanded from the smallness of neutrino mass (discussed in<br />

the next section and in Appendix C), ũ will also be of the same order as u unless there<br />

is a cancellation between the terms in the denominator. In this work we will stick to the<br />

possibility of small u and ũ. We will show in the next section that one needs u ∼ 10 −3<br />

GeV to explain the neutrino data. Hence ũ will also have to be 10 −3 GeV. In the u = 0<br />

limit, ũ would also be 0 and this is our usual R-parity conserving scenario.<br />

4.4 Neutralino-Neutrino Mass Matrix<br />

In this section we discuss the consequence of R-parity violation through the neutralinoneutrino<br />

mixing. It is well known [19] that R-parity violation results in mixing between<br />

the neutrino-neutralino states. In our model the neutrino sector is enlarged and includes<br />

both the standard model neutrino ν Li , as well as the heavier neutrino state Σ 0c<br />

R , which<br />

is a component of SU(2) triplet superfield. Since R-parity is violated we get higgsinoneutrino<br />

mixing terms Y Σ √2i<br />

ũ˜H u 0ν L i<br />

and Y Σ √2i<br />

u˜H u 0Σ0c<br />

, in addition to the conventional R-<br />

parity conserving Dirac mass term Y Σ √2i<br />

v u Σ 0c<br />

R ν L i<br />

. The R-parity breaking former two terms<br />

originated from the term Y Σ √2i<br />

ĤuˆΣ 0 0c<br />

Rˆν L i<br />

in Eq. (4.9), once the sneutrino fields ˜ν Li and<br />

˜Σ 0c<br />

R get vacuum expectation values. The third term also has the same origin and it<br />

is the conventional Dirac mass term in type I or type-III seesaw. In addition to the<br />

higgsino-neutrino mixing terms generated from the superpotential W Σ , there would also<br />

be gaugino-neutrino mixing terms generated from the Kähler potential of the ˆL i and ˆΣ c R .<br />

IntheAppendix Bweshowexplicitly thecontributions comingfromW Σ andtheneutrinosneutrino-gaugino<br />

terms originating from the kinetic term of the triplet superfield ˆΣ c R<br />

written down in Eq. (4.10). Here we write the color singlet neutral-fermion mass matrix<br />

of this model in the basis ψ = (˜λ 0 ,˜λ 3 ,˜H 0 d ,˜H 0 u,Σ 0c<br />

R ,ν L 1<br />

,ν L2 ,ν L3 ) T where with one generation<br />

of Σ c R , the neutral fermion mass matrix is a 8×8 matrix. The mass term is given by<br />

R<br />

L n = − 1 2 ψT M n ψ +h.c. (4.34)<br />

where<br />

⎛√ ⎞<br />

2M<br />

1<br />

√ 0 −g ′ v 1 g ′ v 2 0 −g ′ u 1 −g ′ u 2 −g ′ u 3<br />

0 2M<br />

2<br />

gv 1 −gv 2 0 gu 1 gu 2 gu 3<br />

M n = √ 1 −g ′ v 1 gv 1 0 − √ 2µ 0 0 0 0<br />

g ′ v 2 −gv 2 − √ ∑<br />

2µ 0<br />

i<br />

2 Y Σ i<br />

u i Y Σ1 ũ Y Σ2 ũ Y Σ3 ũ<br />

∑<br />

0 0 0<br />

i Y √ Σ i<br />

u i 2M YΣ1 v 2 Y Σ2 v 2 Y Σ3 v 2<br />

(4.35) .<br />

⎜ −g ′ u 1 gu 1 0 Y Σ1 ũ Y Σ1 v 2 0 0 0<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ −g ′ u 2 gu 2 0 Y Σ2 ũ Y Σ2 v 2 0 0 0 ⎠<br />

−g ′ u 3 gu 3 0 Y Σ3 ũ Y Σ3 v 2 0 0 0<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!