07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

while the parameter α 1 is<br />

α 1 =<br />

M 1 M 2 µ 2 −(M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )v 1 v 2 µ<br />

4MM 1 M 2 µ 2 −4Mµ(M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )v 1 v 2 −(M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )v1(Σ 2 i u i Y Σi ) 2.<br />

(C7)<br />

Below we show how the choice of TeV scale gaugino masses and the triplet fermion mass<br />

M dictate the sneutrino vacuum expectation value u to be smaller than 10 −3 GeV and<br />

the Yukawa Y Σ ≤ 10 −5 to have consistent small ( ≤ eV) standard model neutrino mass.<br />

We consider the following three cases and show that only Case (A) is viable.<br />

Case (A): If one assumes MM 1 M 2 µ 2 and Mµ(M 1 g 2 + M 2 g ′2 )v 1 v 2 ≫ (M 1 g 2 +<br />

M 2 g ′2 )u 2 i Y 2 Σ i<br />

v 2 1 , the first and second term dominate over the third one6 , in the denominator<br />

of Eq. (C6) and Eq. (C7). Then α t and α 1 simplify to<br />

and<br />

α t ∼ (M 1g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )<br />

4MM 1 M 2 µ 2 +..., (C8)<br />

α 1 ∼ 1<br />

4M +....<br />

The neutrino mass matrix Eq. (C2) will have the following form,<br />

m ν ∼ v2 2YΣ<br />

2<br />

2M + u2 (M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )<br />

+ √ (M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )<br />

2ũv 1 uY Σ + v2 1ũ 2 YΣ 2(M 1g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )<br />

2M 1 M 2 4M 1 M 2 µ 4M 1 M 2 µ 2<br />

− √ 2ũv1 2 v 2uYΣ<br />

3 (M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )<br />

−v<br />

4MM 1 M 2 µ 2 1 v 2 µu 2 YΣ<br />

2 (M 1 g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )<br />

. (C10)<br />

4MM 1 M 2 µ 2<br />

(C9)<br />

The order of Y Σ and u would be determined fromthe first two terms of the above equation<br />

respectively. The fourth, fifth and sixth terms of Eq. (C10) cannot determine the order of<br />

Y Σ and u. To show this with an example let us consider the contribution coming from the<br />

fourth term (M 1g 2 +M 2 g ′2 )v 1ũ2 2 YΣ<br />

2<br />

M 1 M 2<br />

. Contribution of the order of 1 eV from this term demands<br />

µ 2<br />

Y Σũ2 2 ∼ 10 −4 GeV 2 for M 1,2 in the TeV range, µ ∼ 10 2 GeV and v 1 in the GeV range 7 . But<br />

if one assumes that Y Σ ∼ 1 andũ 2 ∼ 10 −4 GeV 2 then we get the contribution fromthe first<br />

term of Eq. (C10) v2 2 Y Σ<br />

2 ≫ 1eV, for M ∼ TeV and v M 2 ∼ 100 GeV. The choice YΣ 2 ∼ 10−4<br />

and ũ ∼ 1 GeV also leads to v2 2 Y Σ<br />

2 ≫ 1eV for v M 2 ∼ 10 2 GeV. The other option is to have<br />

YΣ 2 ∼ 10−12 and ũ 2 ∼ 10 8 GeV 2 so that Y Σũ2 2 ∼ 10 −4 GeV 2 . But to satisfy this choice one<br />

needs 10 7 order of magnitude hierarchy between the two vacuum expectation values ũ<br />

and u 8 . This in turn demands acute hierarchy between the different soft supersymmetry<br />

6 Most likely between the first and second terms, the first term would have larger value for the choice<br />

of TeV scale gaugino mass.<br />

7 As an example v 1 ∼ 10 GeV.<br />

8 As the scale of u is fixed from the second term of Eq. (C10) and u < 10 −3 GeV.<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!