07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Γ 1HDM (Σ ± m → l± m Z) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />

32π (1− M2 Z<br />

2<br />

M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />

2<br />

), (3.67)<br />

Σ M Σ<br />

Γ 1HDM (Σ ± m → ν mW ± ) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />

16π (1− M2 Z<br />

2<br />

M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />

2<br />

). (3.68)<br />

Σ M Σ<br />

where λ is the triplet fermion – lepton doublet – Higgs doublet Yukawa coupling in the<br />

one Higgs doublet model, and all mixing terms are neglected. This should be compared<br />

with the corresponding expression given in Eq. (3.62), which on neglecting all mixing and<br />

hence flavor effects reduces to (for m lj = 0)<br />

Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν mZ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />

64π<br />

Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → l∓ m W± ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />

32π<br />

Γ 2HDM (Σ ± m → l ± mZ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />

32π<br />

Γ 2HDM (Σ ± m → ν m W ± ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />

16π<br />

v ′ 2<br />

V 2(1− M2 Z<br />

v ′ 2<br />

V 2(1− M2 W<br />

v ′ 2<br />

V 2(1− M2 Z<br />

M Σ<br />

2 )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />

M Σ<br />

2<br />

), (3.69)<br />

2<br />

M )2 (1+2 M2 W<br />

2<br />

), (3.70)<br />

Σ M Σ<br />

2<br />

M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />

2<br />

),<br />

Σ M Σ<br />

(3.71)<br />

v ′ 2<br />

V 2(1− Z<br />

2<br />

M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />

2<br />

).<br />

Σ M Σ<br />

(3.72)<br />

where V 2 = v 2 +v ′2 is the electroweak breaking scale. The scale of the Yukawa coupling<br />

constants and VEVs are fixed by the neutrino mass m ν ∼ λ 2 V 2 /M Σ for the one Higgs<br />

doublet model and m ν ∼ Y 2 Σ v′2 /M Σ . If one replaces λ 2 and Y 2 Σ v′2 /V 2 with m ν M Σ /V 2 in<br />

both set of expressions, one can see that the the decay rates of heavy fermions into gauge<br />

bosons are identical for both models.<br />

The rates for decay into Higgs for the one Higgs doublet model neglecting flavor effects,<br />

is given by (for m lj = 0)<br />

Γ 1HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m H 0 ) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />

64π (1− M2 H<br />

M Σ<br />

2 )2 , (3.73)<br />

Γ 1HDM (Σ ± m → l ± mH 0 ) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />

32π (1− M2 H<br />

M Σ<br />

2 )2 . (3.74)<br />

For the two Higgs doublet model, the corresponding decay rates are given by Eq. (3.52),<br />

which on neglecting all flavor effects reduces to (for m lj = 0)<br />

Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m h 0 /A 0 ) ≃ Y Σ 2 cos2 αM Σ<br />

(1− M2 h/A<br />

2<br />

64π M )2 , (3.75)<br />

Σ<br />

Γ 2HDM (Σ ± m → l mh ± 0 /A 0 ) ≃ Y Σ 2 cos2 αM Σ<br />

(1− M2 h/A<br />

2<br />

32π M )2 , (3.76)<br />

Σ<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!