PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Γ 1HDM (Σ ± m → l± m Z) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />
32π (1− M2 Z<br />
2<br />
M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />
2<br />
), (3.67)<br />
Σ M Σ<br />
Γ 1HDM (Σ ± m → ν mW ± ) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />
16π (1− M2 Z<br />
2<br />
M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />
2<br />
). (3.68)<br />
Σ M Σ<br />
where λ is the triplet fermion – lepton doublet – Higgs doublet Yukawa coupling in the<br />
one Higgs doublet model, and all mixing terms are neglected. This should be compared<br />
with the corresponding expression given in Eq. (3.62), which on neglecting all mixing and<br />
hence flavor effects reduces to (for m lj = 0)<br />
Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν mZ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />
64π<br />
Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → l∓ m W± ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />
32π<br />
Γ 2HDM (Σ ± m → l ± mZ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />
32π<br />
Γ 2HDM (Σ ± m → ν m W ± ) ≃ Y 2 Σ M Σ<br />
16π<br />
v ′ 2<br />
V 2(1− M2 Z<br />
v ′ 2<br />
V 2(1− M2 W<br />
v ′ 2<br />
V 2(1− M2 Z<br />
M Σ<br />
2 )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />
M Σ<br />
2<br />
), (3.69)<br />
2<br />
M )2 (1+2 M2 W<br />
2<br />
), (3.70)<br />
Σ M Σ<br />
2<br />
M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />
2<br />
),<br />
Σ M Σ<br />
(3.71)<br />
v ′ 2<br />
V 2(1− Z<br />
2<br />
M )2 (1+2 M2 Z<br />
2<br />
).<br />
Σ M Σ<br />
(3.72)<br />
where V 2 = v 2 +v ′2 is the electroweak breaking scale. The scale of the Yukawa coupling<br />
constants and VEVs are fixed by the neutrino mass m ν ∼ λ 2 V 2 /M Σ for the one Higgs<br />
doublet model and m ν ∼ Y 2 Σ v′2 /M Σ . If one replaces λ 2 and Y 2 Σ v′2 /V 2 with m ν M Σ /V 2 in<br />
both set of expressions, one can see that the the decay rates of heavy fermions into gauge<br />
bosons are identical for both models.<br />
The rates for decay into Higgs for the one Higgs doublet model neglecting flavor effects,<br />
is given by (for m lj = 0)<br />
Γ 1HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m H 0 ) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />
64π (1− M2 H<br />
M Σ<br />
2 )2 , (3.73)<br />
Γ 1HDM (Σ ± m → l ± mH 0 ) ≃ λ2 M Σ<br />
32π (1− M2 H<br />
M Σ<br />
2 )2 . (3.74)<br />
For the two Higgs doublet model, the corresponding decay rates are given by Eq. (3.52),<br />
which on neglecting all flavor effects reduces to (for m lj = 0)<br />
Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m h 0 /A 0 ) ≃ Y Σ 2 cos2 αM Σ<br />
(1− M2 h/A<br />
2<br />
64π M )2 , (3.75)<br />
Σ<br />
Γ 2HDM (Σ ± m → l mh ± 0 /A 0 ) ≃ Y Σ 2 cos2 αM Σ<br />
(1− M2 h/A<br />
2<br />
32π M )2 , (3.76)<br />
Σ<br />
59