PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography [1] S. Roy and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7020 (1997) [arXiv:hepph/9612447]. [2] A. S. Joshipura and M. Nowakowski, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2421 (1995) [arXiv:hepph/9408224]; C. Liu, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12, 329 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609410]; A.Datta,B.Mukhopadhyaya andS.Roy, Phys.Rev.D61, 055006(2000)[arXiv:hepph/9905549]; A. S. Joshipura, R. D. Vaidya and S. K. Vempati, Nucl. Phys. B 639, 290 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0203182]. [3] A. S. Joshipura and S. K. Vempati, Phys. Rev. D 60, 095009 (1999) [arXiv:hepph/9808232]; D. E. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, JHEP 0001, 033 (2000) [arXiv:hepph/9901254]. [4] Y. Grossman and S. Rakshit, Phys. Rev. D 69, 093002 (2004) [arXiv:hepph/0311310]; S. Rakshit, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2239 (2004) [arXiv:hepph/0406168]. [5] M. Drees, S. Pakvasa, X. Tata and T. ter Veldhuis, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5335 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9712392]; E. J. Chun, S. K. Kang, C. W. Kim and U. W. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B 544, 89 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9807327]; S. Rakshit, G. Bhattacharyya and A. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 59, 091701 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9811500]; R. Adhikari and G. Omanovic, Phys. Rev. D 59, 073003 (1999); M. Hirsch, M. A. Diaz, W.Porod, J.C.RomaoandJ.W.F.Valle, Phys. Rev.D62, 113008(2000)[Erratumibid.D65, 119901(2002)][arXiv:hep-ph/0004115]; A.S.Joshipura, R.D.Vaidyaand S. K. Vempati, Phys. Rev. D 65, 053018 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0107204]; S. Davidson and M. Losada, JHEP 0005, 021 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005080]; A. Dedes, S. Rimmer and J. Rosiek, JHEP 0608, 005 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0603225]. [6] F. Borzumati and J. S. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 66, 115012 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0207184]; P. Dey, A. Kundu, B. Mukhopadhyaya and S. Nandi, JHEP 0812, 100 (2008) [arXiv:0808.1523 [hep-ph]]. [7] D. E. Lopez-Fogliani and C. Munoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 041801 (2006) [arXiv:hepph/0508297]; P. Ghosh and S. Roy, JHEP 0904, 069 (2009) [arXiv:0812.0084 [hep- 112
ph]]; A. Bartl, M. Hirsch, A. Vicente, S. Liebler and W. Porod, JHEP 0905, 120 (2009) [arXiv:0903.3596 [hep-ph]]. [8] A. Abada and G. Moreau, JHEP 0608, 044 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0604216]; B. Mukhopadhyaya and R. Srikanth, Phys. Rev. D 74, 075001 (2006) [arXiv:hepph/0605109]. [9] A. Santamaria and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 195, 423 (1987); A. Santamaria and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 397 (1988); A. Santamaria and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 39, 1780 (1989). [10] A. Masiero and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 251, 273 (1990). [11] I. Hinchliffe and T. Kaeding, Phys. Rev. D 47, 279 (1993); A. Y. Smirnov and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 380, 317 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9601387]; H. K. Dreiner, arXiv:hep-ph/9707435; J. H. Jang, Y. G. Kimand J. S. Lee, Phys. Rev. D58, 035006 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9711504]. G. Bhattacharyya and A. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3837 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9712245]; P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez, Phys. Rept. 441, 191 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0601023]; M. Artuso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 57, 309 (2008) [arXiv:0801.1833 [hep-ph]]. [12] G. Bhattacharyya and P. B. Pal, Phys. Rev. D 59, 097701 (1999) [arXiv:hepph/9809493]. [13] P.Fayet,Phys.Lett.B69,489(1977);C.S.AulakhandR.N.Mohapatra,Phys.Lett. B119, 136(1982); J. R.Ellis, G.Gelmini, C. Jarlskog, G.G.RossandJ. W.F.Valle, Phys. Lett. B 150, 142 (1985); G. G. Ross and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 151, 375 (1985). [14] P.Nogueira, J.C. RomaoandJ. W.F.Valle, Phys. Lett.B251, 142(1990); J.C. Romao, N. Rius and J. W. F. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B 363, 369 (1991); J. C. Romao and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 272, 436 (1991); J. C. Romao and J. W. F. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B 381, 87 (1992); J. C. Romao, F. de Campos and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 292, 329 (1992) [arXiv:hep-ph/9207269]; J. C. Romao, C. A. Santos and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 288, 311 (1992); M. Shiraishi, I. Umemura and K. Yamamoto, Phys. Lett. B 313, 89 (1993); G. F. Giudice, A. Masiero, M. Pietroni and A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B 396, 243 (1993) [arXiv:hep-ph/9209296]; I. Umemura and K. Yamamoto, Nucl. Phys. B 423, 405 (1994); J. C. Romao, J. Rosiek and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 351, 497 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9502211]; J. C. Romao, F. de Campos, M. A. Garcia-Jareno, M. B. Magro and J. W. F. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B 482, 3 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9604244]. A. Bartl, W. Porod, F. de Campos, M. A. Garcia-Jareno, M. B. Magro, J. W. F. Valle and W. Majerotto, Nucl. Phys. B 502, 19 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9612436]; 113
Page 1:
Neutrinos and Some Aspects of Physi
Page 5:
Declaration This thesis is a presen
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments First and foremost,
Page 11:
iii
Page 14 and 15:
trino masses are bounded within 0.1
Page 16 and 17:
softly broken Z 2 symmetry, the mas
Page 18 and 19:
tribimaximal mixing in the neutrino
Page 20 and 21:
Bibliography [1] Two Higgs doublet
Page 23 and 24:
Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Stand
Page 25:
6.2.2 Charged Lepton Masses and Mix
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Standard
Page 31 and 32:
For positive µ 2 and λ, the Higgs
Page 33 and 34:
type of Yukawa interaction between
Page 35 and 36:
interaction with the Higgs as λ f
Page 37 and 38:
where ˆΦ is the MSSM chiral super
Page 39:
(2004); A. Ghosal, hep-ph/0304090;
Page 44 and 45:
active flavor. In recent years, sev
Page 46 and 47:
Figure 2.1: The possible neutrino s
Page 48 and 49:
Majorana mass term breaks lepton nu
Page 50 and 51:
The kinetic term of the Higgs tripl
Page 52 and 53:
ight handed neutrino N R can be exa
Page 54 and 55:
alternating group which is not a di
Page 56 and 57:
The group contains two one-dimensio
Page 58 and 59:
from neutral-current interactions i
Page 60:
[31] K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra
Page 64 and 65:
of producing the heavy fermion trip
Page 66 and 67:
where Σ ± Ri = Σ1 Ri ∓iΣ2 Ri
Page 68 and 69:
while U ν diagonalizes m ν and ˜
Page 70 and 71:
It is evident that the masses of th
Page 72 and 73:
0.001 0.001 0.0001 0.0001 U e3 1e-0
Page 74 and 75:
if we neglect terms proportional to
Page 76 and 77:
calculations for lepton flavor viol
Page 78 and 79:
fb. Therefore, it is obvious that t
Page 80 and 81:
Σ − -> e m 1 m h 0 Σ − -> e m
Page 82 and 83:
We can also see that for Σ − m 1
Page 84 and 85:
the sinα term. However, decay to h
Page 86 and 87:
Σ − m 1 ->ν m1 W Σ 0 m 1 ->ν
Page 88 and 89:
Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m H 0 ) ≃
Page 90 and 91: Decay modes Σ ± m 1 Σ ± m 2 Σ
Page 92 and 93: III seesaw model. Clearly, for our
Page 94 and 95: Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
Page 96 and 97: • The other dominant decay channe
Page 102 and 103: 3.9 Conclusions The seesaw mechanis
Page 104 and 105: Appendix A: The Scalar Potential an
Page 106 and 107: B: The Interaction Lagrangian B.1:
Page 108 and 109: C H0 ,L 1√ ll 2 (T 11Y † l S 11
Page 110 and 111: c Z,L ll c Z,L lΣ − c Z,L Σ −
Page 112 and 113: Bibliography [1] S. Weinberg, Phys.
Page 114: Lett. B 615, 231 (2005); Phys. Rev.
Page 118 and 119: violating λ ′′ coupling are co
Page 120 and 121: neutralino-neutrinomassmatrixandins
Page 122 and 123: 4.3 Symmetry Breaking In this secti
Page 124 and 125: +(M 2 +m 2 Σ )ũ2 + ∑ m 2˜ν i
Page 126 and 127: Here M 1,2 are the soft supersymmet
Page 128 and 129: is violated, we have neutrino-neutr
Page 130 and 131: (M 1,2 ,M,µ,Y Σi ,v 1,2 ,ũ,u i )
Page 132 and 133: In our model in addition to the sta
Page 134 and 135: 4.8 Conclusion In this work we have
Page 136 and 137: Y Σi √2 ĤuˆΣ 0 0c Rˆν L i
Page 138 and 139: while the parameter α 1 is α 1 =
Page 142 and 143: [15] M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. W
Page 144 and 145: ν i A Σi • ˜ν i h,H,A × χ
Page 146 and 147: 118
Page 148 and 149: of the form ⎛ ⎞ A B B m ν =
Page 150 and 151: triplet representation of A 4 , l =
Page 152 and 153: m 0 =0.016 m 0 =0.024 m 0 =0.032 2
Page 154 and 155: Higgs Neutrino mass matrix Eigenval
Page 156 and 157: 5.3. The deviation of the mixing an
Page 158 and 159: Sin 2 θ 12 Sin 2 θ 13 Sin 2 θ 23
Page 160 and 161: Figure 5.5: Scatter plot showing th
Page 162 and 163: Figure 5.6: Same as Fig. 5.5 but fo
Page 164 and 165: mass matrix is then given as ⎛ m
Page 166 and 167: Bibliography [1] M. C. Gonzalez-Gar
Page 168 and 169: 140
Page 170 and 171: 142
Page 172 and 173: a way that the residual µ−τ sym
Page 174 and 175: where Λ is the cut-off scale of th
Page 176 and 177: m 2 . The eigenvectors are given as
Page 178 and 179: For λ ≃ 2 × 10 −2 ≃ λ2 c 2
Page 180 and 181: 2 2 2 1 1 1 y 2 0 y 3 0 y 4 0 -1 -1
Page 182 and 183: 0.08 0.25 0.06 0.2 10 -3 m νee (eV
Page 184 and 185: We show the values of |U e3 | ≡ s
Page 186 and 187: while the branching ratio for this
Page 188 and 189: 6.4 The Vacuum Expectation Values I
Page 190 and 191:
where we have defined B = (b+f 1 +f
Page 192 and 193:
VEV alignments. Another way the VEV
Page 194 and 195:
(2006); M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M.
Page 196 and 197:
168
Page 198 and 199:
metric standard model in chapter 1.
Page 200 and 201:
mally two. However the R-parity vio
Page 202 and 203:
sector contains the exact/approxima
show all

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?