Bibliography [1] M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and J. Salvado, JHEP 1004, 056 (2010) [arXiv:1001.4524 [hep-ph]]. [2] K. Eguchi et al., [KamLAND Collaboration], Phys.Rev.Lett.90 (2003) 021802; T. Araki et al. [KamLAND Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081801 (2005). I Shimizu, talk at 10th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics, TAUP 2007,Sendai, Japan, 2007. [3] B. T. Cleveland et al., Astrophys. J. 496, 505 (1998); J. N. Abdurashitov et al. [SAGE Collaboration], Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 122, 211 (2002) [J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 95, 181 (2002)]; W. Hampel et al. [GALLEX Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 447, 127 (1999); S. Fukuda et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 539, 179 (2002); B. Aharmim et al. [SNO Collaboration], Phys. Rev. C 72, 055502 (2005); B. Collaboration, arXiv:0708.2251 [astro-ph]. [4] Y. Ashie et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 71, 112005 (2005). [5] E. Aliu et al. [K2K Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081802 (2005). [6] D. G. Michael et al.. [MINOS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 191801 (2006). [7] M. Apollonio et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 331 (2003). [8] P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 458, 79 (1999); P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 530 (2002) 167; P. F. Harrison and W. G. Scott, arXiv:hep-ph/0402006. [9] T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, hep-ph/9702253; R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nussinov, Phys. Rev. D 60, 013002 (1999); E. Ma and M. Raidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 011802 (2001); C. S. Lam, Phys. Lett. B 507, 214 (2001); P.F. Harrison and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 547, 219 (2002); W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, Phys. Lett. B 572, 189 (2003); J. Phys. G 30, 73 (2004); Y. Koide, Phys. Rev. D 69, 093001 (2004); A. Ghosal, hep-ph/0304090; W. Grimuset al., Nucl. Phys. B713, 151(2005); R. N. Mohapatra, JHEP 0410, 027 (2004); R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nasri, Phys. 138
Rev. D 71, 033001 (2005); R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri and H. B. Yu, Phys. Lett. B 615, 231 (2005); Phys. Rev. D 72, 033007 (2005); B. Brahmachari and S. Choubey, Phys. Lett. B 642, 495 (2006); F. Feruglio,Y. Lin, hep-ph/0712.1528. [10] S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann, Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 259 (2005); [11] E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Phys. Rev. D 64, 113012 (2001). [12] E. Ma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 627 (2002). [13] K. S. Babu, E. Ma and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 552, 207 (2003). [14] G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Nucl. Phys. B 720, 64 (2005); G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Nucl. Phys. B 741, 215 (2006); G. Altarelli , F. Feruglio and Y. Lin, Nucl. Phys. B 775, 31 (2007). [15] K. S. Babu and X.-G. He, arXiv:hep-ph/0507217. [16] E. Ma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 101 (2007); E. Ma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 2931 (2006); E. Ma, H. Sawanaka and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B 641, 301 (2006); B. Adhikary, B. Brahmachari, A. Ghosal, E. Ma and M. K. Parida, Phys. Lett. B 638, 345 (2006); E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 73, 057304 (2006); S. L. Chen, M. Frigerio and E. Ma, Nucl. Phys. B 724, 423 (2005); E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 72, 037301 (2005); E. Ma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 2601 (2005); E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 70, 031901 (2004). [17] M. Hirsch, A. S. Joshipura, S. Kaneko and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 151802 (2007); [arXiv:hep-ph/0703046]. M. Hirsch, J. C. Romao, S. Skadhauge, J. W. F. Valle and A. Villanova del Moral, Phys. Rev. D 69, 093006 (2004); L. Lavoura and H. Kuhbock, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 181 (2007); Y. Koide, Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 617 (2007); S. F. King and M. Malinsky, Phys. Lett. B 645, 351 (2007); X. G. He, Y. Y. Keum and R. R. Volkas, JHEP 0604, 039 (2006); A. Zee, Phys. Lett.B630, 58(2005); F.Bazzocchi, S.Kaneko andS.Morisi, arXiv:0707.3032 [hep-ph]. B. Adhikary and A. Ghosal, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073020 (2007); I. K. Cooper, S. F. King and C. Luhn, Phys. Lett. B 690, 396 (2010) [arXiv:1004.3243 [hep-ph]]; K. S. Babu and S. Gabriel, arXiv:1006.0203 [hep-ph]. [18] M. Honda and M. Tanimoto, arXiv:0801.0181 [hep-ph]. [19] S. Choubey, arXiv:hep-ph/0509217; S. Goswami, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21, 1901 (2006); A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S. Goswami, S. T. Petcov and D. P. Roy, Phys. Lett. B 608, 115 (2005); G. L. Fogli et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 742 (2006). [20] M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola and J. W. F. Valle, New J. Phys. 6, 122 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0405172]. 139
- Page 1:
Neutrinos and Some Aspects of Physi
- Page 5:
Declaration This thesis is a presen
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments First and foremost,
- Page 11:
iii
- Page 14 and 15:
trino masses are bounded within 0.1
- Page 16 and 17:
softly broken Z 2 symmetry, the mas
- Page 18 and 19:
tribimaximal mixing in the neutrino
- Page 20 and 21:
Bibliography [1] Two Higgs doublet
- Page 23 and 24:
Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Stand
- Page 25:
6.2.2 Charged Lepton Masses and Mix
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Standard
- Page 31 and 32:
For positive µ 2 and λ, the Higgs
- Page 33 and 34:
type of Yukawa interaction between
- Page 35 and 36:
interaction with the Higgs as λ f
- Page 37 and 38:
where ˆΦ is the MSSM chiral super
- Page 39:
(2004); A. Ghosal, hep-ph/0304090;
- Page 44 and 45:
active flavor. In recent years, sev
- Page 46 and 47:
Figure 2.1: The possible neutrino s
- Page 48 and 49:
Majorana mass term breaks lepton nu
- Page 50 and 51:
The kinetic term of the Higgs tripl
- Page 52 and 53:
ight handed neutrino N R can be exa
- Page 54 and 55:
alternating group which is not a di
- Page 56 and 57:
The group contains two one-dimensio
- Page 58 and 59:
from neutral-current interactions i
- Page 60:
[31] K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra
- Page 64 and 65:
of producing the heavy fermion trip
- Page 66 and 67:
where Σ ± Ri = Σ1 Ri ∓iΣ2 Ri
- Page 68 and 69:
while U ν diagonalizes m ν and ˜
- Page 70 and 71:
It is evident that the masses of th
- Page 72 and 73:
0.001 0.001 0.0001 0.0001 U e3 1e-0
- Page 74 and 75:
if we neglect terms proportional to
- Page 76 and 77:
calculations for lepton flavor viol
- Page 78 and 79:
fb. Therefore, it is obvious that t
- Page 80 and 81:
Σ − -> e m 1 m h 0 Σ − -> e m
- Page 82 and 83:
We can also see that for Σ − m 1
- Page 84 and 85:
the sinα term. However, decay to h
- Page 86 and 87:
Σ − m 1 ->ν m1 W Σ 0 m 1 ->ν
- Page 88 and 89:
Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m H 0 ) ≃
- Page 90 and 91:
Decay modes Σ ± m 1 Σ ± m 2 Σ
- Page 92 and 93:
III seesaw model. Clearly, for our
- Page 94 and 95:
Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
- Page 96 and 97:
• The other dominant decay channe
- Page 98 and 99:
Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
- Page 100 and 101:
Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
- Page 102 and 103:
3.9 Conclusions The seesaw mechanis
- Page 104 and 105:
Appendix A: The Scalar Potential an
- Page 106 and 107:
B: The Interaction Lagrangian B.1:
- Page 108 and 109:
C H0 ,L 1√ ll 2 (T 11Y † l S 11
- Page 110 and 111:
c Z,L ll c Z,L lΣ − c Z,L Σ −
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography [1] S. Weinberg, Phys.
- Page 114:
Lett. B 615, 231 (2005); Phys. Rev.
- Page 118 and 119: violating λ ′′ coupling are co
- Page 120 and 121: neutralino-neutrinomassmatrixandins
- Page 122 and 123: 4.3 Symmetry Breaking In this secti
- Page 124 and 125: +(M 2 +m 2 Σ )ũ2 + ∑ m 2˜ν i
- Page 126 and 127: Here M 1,2 are the soft supersymmet
- Page 128 and 129: is violated, we have neutrino-neutr
- Page 130 and 131: (M 1,2 ,M,µ,Y Σi ,v 1,2 ,ũ,u i )
- Page 132 and 133: In our model in addition to the sta
- Page 134 and 135: 4.8 Conclusion In this work we have
- Page 136 and 137: Y Σi √2 ĤuˆΣ 0 0c Rˆν L i
- Page 138 and 139: while the parameter α 1 is α 1 =
- Page 140 and 141: Bibliography [1] S. Roy and B. Mukh
- Page 142 and 143: [15] M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. W
- Page 144 and 145: ν i A Σi • ˜ν i h,H,A × χ
- Page 146 and 147: 118
- Page 148 and 149: of the form ⎛ ⎞ A B B m ν =
- Page 150 and 151: triplet representation of A 4 , l =
- Page 152 and 153: m 0 =0.016 m 0 =0.024 m 0 =0.032 2
- Page 154 and 155: Higgs Neutrino mass matrix Eigenval
- Page 156 and 157: 5.3. The deviation of the mixing an
- Page 158 and 159: Sin 2 θ 12 Sin 2 θ 13 Sin 2 θ 23
- Page 160 and 161: Figure 5.5: Scatter plot showing th
- Page 162 and 163: Figure 5.6: Same as Fig. 5.5 but fo
- Page 164 and 165: mass matrix is then given as ⎛ m
- Page 168 and 169: 140
- Page 170 and 171: 142
- Page 172 and 173: a way that the residual µ−τ sym
- Page 174 and 175: where Λ is the cut-off scale of th
- Page 176 and 177: m 2 . The eigenvectors are given as
- Page 178 and 179: For λ ≃ 2 × 10 −2 ≃ λ2 c 2
- Page 180 and 181: 2 2 2 1 1 1 y 2 0 y 3 0 y 4 0 -1 -1
- Page 182 and 183: 0.08 0.25 0.06 0.2 10 -3 m νee (eV
- Page 184 and 185: We show the values of |U e3 | ≡ s
- Page 186 and 187: while the branching ratio for this
- Page 188 and 189: 6.4 The Vacuum Expectation Values I
- Page 190 and 191: where we have defined B = (b+f 1 +f
- Page 192 and 193: VEV alignments. Another way the VEV
- Page 194 and 195: (2006); M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M.
- Page 196 and 197: 168
- Page 198 and 199: metric standard model in chapter 1.
- Page 200 and 201: mally two. However the R-parity vio
- Page 202 and 203: sector contains the exact/approxima