PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
if we neglect terms proportional to v ′2 . The mixing matrices U l and U r which diagonalize<br />
˜m † l ˜m l (cf. Eq. (3.34)) and ˜m l˜m † l<br />
(cf. Eq. (3.32)) respectively, turn out to be unit matrices<br />
at leading order.<br />
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞<br />
1 0 0 1 0 0<br />
U l ≃ ⎝0 1 0⎠, U r ≃ ⎝0 1 0⎠, (3.44)<br />
0 0 1 0 0 1<br />
Finally, we show in Fig. 3.3 the impact of µ-τ symmetry breaking on the low energy<br />
neutrino parameters. For the sake of illustration we choose a particular form for this<br />
breaking, by taking M 3 ≠ M 2 . Departure from µ-τ symmetry results in departure of<br />
U e3 from zero and sin 2 θ 23 from 0.5. We show in Fig. 3.3 the U e3 (left hand panel) and<br />
|0.5−sin 2 θ 23 | generated as a function of the symmetry breaking parameter ǫ = M 3 −M 2 .<br />
The figure is generated for a 4 = −0.066, a 11 = 0.171, a 6 = 0.064, a 8 = 0.0037 and<br />
m 0 = 0.745 eV. We have fixed M 1 = M 2 = 299 GeV in this plot. For ǫ = 0, µ-τ<br />
symmetry is restored and both U e3 and 0.5−sin 2 θ 23 go to zero. We show only points in<br />
this figure for which the current data can be explained within 3σ. We note that for ǫ > 0<br />
the curve extends to about M 3 = M 2 + 2.6 GeV, for this set of model parameters. For<br />
ǫ < 0, the allowed range for ǫ is far more restricted.<br />
We next turn our attention to the predictions of this model for the heavy fermion<br />
sector. The 6×6 mixing matrices, which govern the mixing of the heavy leptons with light<br />
ones, can also be obtained as discussed before. We will see in the next section that all the<br />
four 3×3 blocks of the matrices U, S and T are extremely important for phenomenology<br />
at the LHC. We denote these 3×3 blocks as<br />
U =<br />
S =<br />
T =<br />
( )<br />
U11 U 12<br />
=<br />
U 21 U 22<br />
( )<br />
(Wν ) 11 U 0 (W ν ) 12 U Σ<br />
, (3.45)<br />
(W ν ) 21 U 0 (W ν ) 22 U Σ<br />
( ) (<br />
S11 S 12 (WL )<br />
= 11 U l (W L ) 12 Uh<br />
L<br />
S 21 S 22 (W L ) 21 U l (W L ) 22 Uh<br />
L<br />
( ) (<br />
T11 T 12 (WR )<br />
= 11 U r (W R ) 12 Uh<br />
R<br />
T 21 T 22 (W R ) 21 U r (W R ) 22 Uh<br />
R<br />
)<br />
, (3.46)<br />
)<br />
, (3.47)<br />
The matrices W ν , W L and W R have been given in Eqs. (3.20), (3.30) and (3.31) respectively.<br />
Hence, the 3×3 blocks in S,T and in U can be estimated for our choice of m D , M<br />
and m l . In particular, we note that S 11 and T 11 are close to 1, while U 11 is given almost<br />
by U PMNS . The off-diagonal blocks U 12 , U 21 , S 12 and S 21 , are suppressed by ∼ m D /M,<br />
while T 12 and T 21 are suppressed by ∼ m D m l /M 2 . Finally, the matrices U 22 = (W ν ) 22 U Σ ,<br />
S 22 = (W L ) 22 Uh L, and while T 22 = (W R ) 22 Uh R ≃ UR h . To estimate these we need to evaluate<br />
first the matrices which diagonalize the heavy fermion mass matrices ˜M, ˜M† ˜M H H ,<br />
46