07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

demand that v ′ ∼ 10 5 eV in order to generate neutrino masses of ∼ 0.1 eV keeping the<br />

Yukawa couplings ∼ 1.<br />

We next turn to predictions of this model for the mass squared differences and<br />

the mixing angles. Since the neutrino mass matrix we obtained in Eq. (3.41) has µ-τ<br />

symmetry it follows that<br />

θ 13 = 0 and θ 23 = π/4. (3.42)<br />

To find the mixing angle θ 12 and the mass squared differences ∆m 2 21 and ∆m2 31 1 , one<br />

needs to diagonalize the mass matrix m ν given in Eq. (3.41). In fact, the form of m ν<br />

in Eq. (3.41) is the standard form of the neutrino mass matrix with µ-τ symmetry, and<br />

hence the expression of mixing angle θ 12 as well ∆m 2 21 and ∆m2 31 can be found in the<br />

literature (see for e.g. [26]). We show in Fig. 3.1 the variation of sin 2 θ 12 (upper panels)<br />

and R = ∆m 2 21/|∆m 2 31| (lower panels) with the Yukawa couplings a 4 , a 11 and a 6 . We do<br />

not show the corresponding dependence on a 8 since it looks almost identical to the panel<br />

corresponding to a 6 . The figure is produced assuming inverted mass hierarchy for the<br />

neutrino, i.e., ∆m 2 31 < 0. The neutrino mass matrix given by Eq. (3.41) could very easily<br />

yield ∆m 2 31 > 0 and hence the normal mass hierarchy (see for e.g. [26]). However, for the<br />

sake of illustration, we will show results for only the inverted hierarchy. In every panel of<br />

Fig. 3.1, all Yukawa couplings apart from the one plotted on the x-axis, are allowed to<br />

vary freely. The points show the predicted values of sin 2 θ 12 (upper panels) and R (lower<br />

panels) as a function of the Yukawa couplings for which all oscillation parameters are<br />

within the 3σ values given in [27], For this figure we take M 1 = M 2 for simplicity and<br />

define m 0 = v ′2 /(2M 1 ). The blue points are for m = 0.95 eV while the green points are<br />

for m 0 = 0.006 eV.<br />

Fig. 3.2 is a scatter plot showing the values of the Yukawa couplings which give<br />

all oscillation parameters within their 3σ allowed ranges given in [27]. Again as in the<br />

previous plot we assume M 1 = M 2 , define m 0 = v ′2 /(2M 1 ) and show the allowed points<br />

for m 0 = 0.96 eV (blue), 0.006 eV (green) and 0.0021 eV (red). All Yukawa couplings<br />

apart from the ones shown in the x-axis and y-axis are allowed to vary freely, in each<br />

panel.<br />

Since the µ andτ charged lepton masses aredifferent, we phenomenologically choose<br />

to not impose the µ-τ symmetry on the charged lepton mass matrix 2 . Hence, without<br />

loosing generality, the charged lepton Yukawa matrix can be taken as<br />

⎛<br />

Y l = ⎝ Y ⎞<br />

e 0 0<br />

0 Y µ 0 ⎠, . (3.43)<br />

0 0 Y τ<br />

The masses of the light charged leptons can then be obtained from Eqs. (3.32) and/or<br />

(3.34). Forourchoice ofY Σ andM, itturnsoutthatm e ≈ vY e , m µ ≈ vY µ , andm τ ≈ vY τ ,<br />

1 We define ∆m 2 ij = m2 i −m2 j .<br />

2 Our choice of the lepton masses and mixing are dictated solely by observations.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!