PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200604017 Manimala Mitra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Vertices Vertex factors F ab<br />
eµ H 1 ++ 2y 3 sinθCP L<br />
eµH ++<br />
2 2y 3 cosθCP L<br />
eτH ++<br />
1 2y 3 cosθCP L<br />
eτH 2 ++ 2y 3 sinθCP L<br />
eeH ++<br />
(sinθu<br />
1 y 1 +cosθu 2 )<br />
4 Λ<br />
(cosθu<br />
2 y 1 −sinθu 2 )<br />
4 Λ<br />
(sinθu<br />
1 y 1 +cosθu 2 )<br />
2 Λ<br />
(cosθu<br />
2 y 1 −sinθu 2 )<br />
2 Λ<br />
eeH ++<br />
µτH ++<br />
µτH ++<br />
ττH 1 ++ u<br />
y 1 1 Λ<br />
cosθCP L<br />
ττH ++<br />
2 y 1<br />
u 1<br />
Λ<br />
sinθCP L<br />
µµH ++<br />
1 y 1<br />
u 2<br />
Λ<br />
sinθCP L<br />
µµH ++<br />
2 y 1<br />
u 2<br />
Λ<br />
cosθCP L<br />
CP L<br />
CP L<br />
CP L<br />
CP L<br />
Table 6.2: Doubly charged Higgs triplet and lepton vertices and the corresponding vertex<br />
factors F ab , where a and b are generation indices. The charged lepton mass matrix is<br />
almost diagonal in our model. In this analysis we have considered that mass basis and<br />
flavor basis of the charged leptons are the same.<br />
The current experimental constraint on this decay mode is BR(τ → eeµ) < 2×10 −7 [25],<br />
which constrains our model parameter y 3 as (assuming M H<br />
++ ∼ 300 GeV)<br />
1,2<br />
|y 3 | ∼ < 10 −1 . (6.46)<br />
In our model y 3 is predicted to be large for the inverted hierarchy while it could betiny for<br />
the normal hierarchy. On the face of it then it appears that the bound given by Eq. (6.46)<br />
disfavors the inverted hierarchy for our model. However, recall that the allowed values<br />
of y 3 shown in Figs. 6.2 and 6.3 were presented assuming v1 2 to lie between 10−3 −10 −4<br />
eV 2 . However, v1 2 could be higher and since what determines the mass squared differences<br />
∆m 2 21 and ∆m2 31 is the product of v2 1 and the Yukawas, higher v2 1 would imply smaller<br />
values of the latter. For instance, we could have taken v1 2 ∼ 10−1 − 10 −2 eV 2 and in<br />
that case inverted hierarchy would still be allowed. The bound given by Eq. (6.46) has<br />
been obtained assuming M H<br />
++ ∼ 300 GeV. For more massive doubly charged Higgs the<br />
1,2<br />
braching ratio would go down. On the other hand, if one uses bounds from lepton flavor<br />
violating decays to constrain the Yukawas, then one would obtain corresponding limits<br />
on the value of v 1 . We conclude that with improved bounds on lepton flavor violating<br />
decay modes, one could test our model and/or the neutrino mass hierarchy predicted by<br />
our model.<br />
159