- Page 1: Neutrinos and Some Aspects of Physi
- Page 5: Declaration This thesis is a presen
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgments First and foremost,
- Page 11: iii
- Page 14 and 15: trino masses are bounded within 0.1
- Page 16 and 17: softly broken Z 2 symmetry, the mas
- Page 18 and 19: tribimaximal mixing in the neutrino
- Page 23 and 24: Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Stand
- Page 25: 6.2.2 Charged Lepton Masses and Mix
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Standard
- Page 31 and 32: For positive µ 2 and λ, the Higgs
- Page 33 and 34: type of Yukawa interaction between
- Page 35 and 36: interaction with the Higgs as λ f
- Page 37 and 38: where ˆΦ is the MSSM chiral super
- Page 39: (2004); A. Ghosal, hep-ph/0304090;
- Page 44 and 45: active flavor. In recent years, sev
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 2.1: The possible neutrino s
- Page 48 and 49: Majorana mass term breaks lepton nu
- Page 50 and 51: The kinetic term of the Higgs tripl
- Page 52 and 53: ight handed neutrino N R can be exa
- Page 54 and 55: alternating group which is not a di
- Page 56 and 57: The group contains two one-dimensio
- Page 58 and 59: from neutral-current interactions i
- Page 60: [31] K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra
- Page 64 and 65: of producing the heavy fermion trip
- Page 66 and 67: where Σ ± Ri = Σ1 Ri ∓iΣ2 Ri
- Page 68 and 69: while U ν diagonalizes m ν and ˜
- Page 70 and 71:
It is evident that the masses of th
- Page 72 and 73:
0.001 0.001 0.0001 0.0001 U e3 1e-0
- Page 74 and 75:
if we neglect terms proportional to
- Page 76 and 77:
calculations for lepton flavor viol
- Page 78 and 79:
fb. Therefore, it is obvious that t
- Page 80 and 81:
Σ − -> e m 1 m h 0 Σ − -> e m
- Page 82 and 83:
We can also see that for Σ − m 1
- Page 84 and 85:
the sinα term. However, decay to h
- Page 86 and 87:
Σ − m 1 ->ν m1 W Σ 0 m 1 ->ν
- Page 88 and 89:
Γ 2HDM (Σ 0 m → ν m H 0 ) ≃
- Page 90 and 91:
Decay modes Σ ± m 1 Σ ± m 2 Σ
- Page 92 and 93:
III seesaw model. Clearly, for our
- Page 94 and 95:
Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
- Page 96 and 97:
• The other dominant decay channe
- Page 98 and 99:
Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
- Page 100 and 101:
Sl no Channels Effective cross-sect
- Page 102 and 103:
3.9 Conclusions The seesaw mechanis
- Page 104 and 105:
Appendix A: The Scalar Potential an
- Page 106 and 107:
B: The Interaction Lagrangian B.1:
- Page 108 and 109:
C H0 ,L 1√ ll 2 (T 11Y † l S 11
- Page 110 and 111:
c Z,L ll c Z,L lΣ − c Z,L Σ −
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography [1] S. Weinberg, Phys.
- Page 114:
Lett. B 615, 231 (2005); Phys. Rev.
- Page 118 and 119:
violating λ ′′ coupling are co
- Page 120 and 121:
neutralino-neutrinomassmatrixandins
- Page 122 and 123:
4.3 Symmetry Breaking In this secti
- Page 124 and 125:
+(M 2 +m 2 Σ )ũ2 + ∑ m 2˜ν i
- Page 126 and 127:
Here M 1,2 are the soft supersymmet
- Page 128 and 129:
is violated, we have neutrino-neutr
- Page 130 and 131:
(M 1,2 ,M,µ,Y Σi ,v 1,2 ,ũ,u i )
- Page 132 and 133:
In our model in addition to the sta
- Page 134 and 135:
4.8 Conclusion In this work we have
- Page 136 and 137:
Y Σi √2 ĤuˆΣ 0 0c Rˆν L i
- Page 138 and 139:
while the parameter α 1 is α 1 =
- Page 140 and 141:
Bibliography [1] S. Roy and B. Mukh
- Page 142 and 143:
[15] M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. W
- Page 144 and 145:
ν i A Σi • ˜ν i h,H,A × χ
- Page 146 and 147:
118
- Page 148 and 149:
of the form ⎛ ⎞ A B B m ν =
- Page 150 and 151:
triplet representation of A 4 , l =
- Page 152 and 153:
m 0 =0.016 m 0 =0.024 m 0 =0.032 2
- Page 154 and 155:
Higgs Neutrino mass matrix Eigenval
- Page 156 and 157:
5.3. The deviation of the mixing an
- Page 158 and 159:
Sin 2 θ 12 Sin 2 θ 13 Sin 2 θ 23
- Page 160 and 161:
Figure 5.5: Scatter plot showing th
- Page 162 and 163:
Figure 5.6: Same as Fig. 5.5 but fo
- Page 164 and 165:
mass matrix is then given as ⎛ m
- Page 166 and 167:
Bibliography [1] M. C. Gonzalez-Gar
- Page 168 and 169:
140
- Page 170 and 171:
142
- Page 172 and 173:
a way that the residual µ−τ sym
- Page 174 and 175:
where Λ is the cut-off scale of th
- Page 176 and 177:
m 2 . The eigenvectors are given as
- Page 178 and 179:
For λ ≃ 2 × 10 −2 ≃ λ2 c 2
- Page 180 and 181:
2 2 2 1 1 1 y 2 0 y 3 0 y 4 0 -1 -1
- Page 182 and 183:
0.08 0.25 0.06 0.2 10 -3 m νee (eV
- Page 184 and 185:
We show the values of |U e3 | ≡ s
- Page 186 and 187:
while the branching ratio for this
- Page 188 and 189:
6.4 The Vacuum Expectation Values I
- Page 190 and 191:
where we have defined B = (b+f 1 +f
- Page 192 and 193:
VEV alignments. Another way the VEV
- Page 194 and 195:
(2006); M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M.
- Page 196 and 197:
168
- Page 198 and 199:
metric standard model in chapter 1.
- Page 200 and 201:
mally two. However the R-parity vio
- Page 202 and 203:
sector contains the exact/approxima