17.01.2014 Views

3433-vol. 6 issue 2-3.pmd - iarfc

3433-vol. 6 issue 2-3.pmd - iarfc

3433-vol. 6 issue 2-3.pmd - iarfc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Volume 6, Issue 2 & 3 41<br />

typical nonsmoker’s net worth was roughly 50% higher than light smokers<br />

and roughly twice the level of heavy smokers. In addition, there was a<br />

statistically significant negative relationship between net worth and smoking,<br />

which appears to harm a smoker’s wealth as well as his or her health.<br />

Studies have also confirmed an association between obesity,<br />

earnings, and wealth accumulation. A so-called “fat penalty” appears to<br />

particularly affect White females. Zagorsky (2005) found a large negative<br />

association between body mass index (BMI) and White female’s net worth, a<br />

smaller negative association for Black women and White males, and no<br />

relationship for Black males. In addition, large amounts of weight loss were<br />

associated with a dramatically improved financial position. Conley and<br />

Glauber (2005) estimated that a one percent increase in a woman’s body mass<br />

index (BMI) is associated with a 0.6 percentage point decrease in family<br />

income. Men, however, appear to experience no negative effects of body<br />

mass on economic outcomes. Several organizations have estimated the<br />

financial cost of obesity. In addition to the above-mentioned Rand Corporation<br />

estimate of 20% to 30% higher health care costs for the moderately obese<br />

(Rand Corporation, 2004), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<br />

estimates that a 10% weight loss could reduce an overweight person’s lifetime<br />

medical costs by $2,200 to $5,300 (U.S. Department of Health and Human<br />

Services, 2003). Research firm RTI International estimates that obese people<br />

spend $900 a year more in medical expenses than people of normal weight<br />

(Andrews, 2004). The cost to employers of unhealthy behaviors, both in<br />

health care expenses and absenteeism, is enormous. Therefore, it is not<br />

surprising that some employers are providing wellness programs, cash<br />

rewards, and/or health insurance premium discounts to workers who quit<br />

smoking and lose weight.<br />

Planning Strategies<br />

Primary and Secondary Health Care Expenses<br />

Primary health costs are out-of-pocket expenses for health care<br />

services. Examples are co-payments, deductibles, and physician and hospital<br />

bills not covered by health insurance. The amount that patients are responsible<br />

for varies with the quality of their health coverage. The best policies<br />

have low (e.g., $100) yearly deductibles, low (e.g., $2,000) annual co-insurance<br />

caps (a.k.a., stop loss limits), low (e.g., $5 or $10) co-payments for prescription<br />

drugs and office visits, high (e.g., $1 million per person or unlimited) lifetime<br />

maximum payments, and a wide choice of medical service providers.<br />

Secondary medical costs are expenses that are tangential to the<br />

provision of direct medical services but can cause financial difficulty just the<br />

same. A family medical crisis can lead to lots of seemingly small unexpected<br />

expenses that add up. Examples include airfare, mileage, parking, and tolls to<br />

travel to hospitals and meals eaten on the road or in hospital cafeterias. Also,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!