17.01.2014 Views

3433-vol. 6 issue 2-3.pmd - iarfc

3433-vol. 6 issue 2-3.pmd - iarfc

3433-vol. 6 issue 2-3.pmd - iarfc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Volume 6, Issue 2 & 3 77<br />

Income Replacement Ratios<br />

This paper does not attempt to estimate income replacement rate<br />

targets or assess the adequacy of the current situation. It may be reasonable<br />

to assume that income replacement ratios less than 100% are sufficient during<br />

retirement because most individuals will experience lower tax rates, no Social<br />

Security taxes, less spending on food, commuting and clothing expenses, and<br />

smaller mortgage expenses. However, higher medical goods and services raise<br />

the income replacement rates. Schieber (2004) estimates the income replacement<br />

rate at around 70% for a wide range of income classes. Alford, Farnen,<br />

and Schachet (2004) report replacement ratios of 89% for the low income level<br />

of $20,000 and 78% for the high income level of $90,000. Of course, Social<br />

Security represents a larger percentage of income for low income earners<br />

(65%) and a smaller percentage of income for high income earners (33%). In<br />

an earlier study, Palmer (1994) reports replacement ratios of 76% and 78% for a<br />

married couple with income levels of $20,000 and $90,000, respectively.<br />

Obviously, higher income earners have to save a larger percentage of their<br />

income to maintain their pre-retirement standard of living. Replacement ratios<br />

are based on the situation of an average worker and need to be carefully<br />

estimated for each individual particular situation. Simple rules of thumb may<br />

be misleading in estimating target savings and replacement rates.<br />

Devaney and Su (1997) report that, in 1995, Social Security income<br />

constituted 42.8% of a retiree’s income while pensions, annuities, and assets<br />

comprised 37.2% of its retirement income. The retiree’s current earnings were<br />

17.8%. Therefore, if assets comprise 40% of accumulated wealth at retirement,<br />

an income replacement ratio of 80% implies that 32% of a retiree’s income<br />

comes from his accumulated wealth at retirement. If the withdrawals from<br />

pensions and assets range from 30% (low income groups) to 90% (high<br />

income groups) during retirement, an 80% income replacement ratio indicates<br />

that the low income and the high income groups would need income replacement<br />

ratios of 24% and 72% of their accumulated wealth at retirement,<br />

respectively.<br />

Research & Theory<br />

The Model for Calculating Income Replacement Ratio<br />

In addition to the savings rate, the income replacement ratio depends<br />

on the following factors, with the base case values used in the examples<br />

shown in parentheses:<br />

I 1<br />

: the income at end of the first year<br />

n: the length of the savings period (35 years)<br />

i: the rate of inflation (2.5%) and income keeps up with inflation<br />

g e<br />

: the real rate of growth of income (1%)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!