SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Lanka <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> have ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination<br />
of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Bangladesh, Nepal, India, Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Sri<br />
Lanka have ratified both the Optional Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child<br />
(i.e. on the involvement of children in armed conflict <strong>and</strong> on the sale of children, child<br />
prostitution <strong>and</strong> child pornography). None of the research countries have ratified or signed<br />
the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural<br />
Rights.<br />
<strong>The</strong> domestic application of these international conventions differs across the research<br />
countries. In Nepal, Part 22 of the Interim Constitution, m<strong>and</strong>ates legislative approval/<br />
ratification of international treaties. Almost identical to its corresponding provision (Article<br />
126) of the 1990 Constitution, Article 156 (1) requires the ratification of international treaties<br />
<strong>and</strong> agreements as prescribed by law (in this case the Nepal Treaty Act, 1990) <strong>and</strong> in<br />
accordance with the Article’s further provisions. Clause (2) provides that the prescribed law<br />
must provide that unless a treaty or agreement pertaining to “(a) peace & friendship; (b)<br />
security <strong>and</strong> strategic alliance; (c) the boundaries of Nepal; <strong>and</strong> (d) natural resources <strong>and</strong> the<br />
distribution of their uses” is ratified or otherwise accepted by 2/3 majority in Parliament<br />
(unless such treaty relating to (a) <strong>and</strong> (d) above “is of ordinary nature which does not affect<br />
the nation extensively, seriously, or in the long-term” in which case it can be approved by<br />
simple majority of Parliament) it shall not be binding on the state. 7 <strong>The</strong> Nepal Treaty Act,<br />
1990 contains this requirement <strong>and</strong> thereafter prescribes a monist approach. It states that once<br />
Nepal has ratified an international treaty through its Parliament, if there is a conflict between<br />
the treaty <strong>and</strong> current domestic law then the latter shall be invalid. 8 As noted in the following<br />
chapters, this monist approach has been used significantly by Nepal’s Supreme Court in its<br />
rulings.<br />
By contrast, in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Indonesia international<br />
conventions are not automatically applicable on being ratified. In some cases these countries<br />
have enacted specific legislation related to the international human rights conventions they<br />
have signed 9 or courts in these countries have relied on these conventions to recognize or<br />
exp<strong>and</strong> the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of human rights in their judgments. Some of the research countries<br />
also have some form of human rights legislation that either establish human rights<br />
institutions. 10<br />
7 Article 156, Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2007<br />
8 Section 9, Nepal Treaty Act, 1990<br />
9 See for instance Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (India) <strong>and</strong> the Law on Human Rights, 1999<br />
(Indonesia)<br />
10 See for instance Article 132, Constitution of Indonesia, Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (India), Human<br />
Rights Commission Act, 1996 (Sri Lanka), <strong>and</strong> Regulation of the President of the Republic of Indonesian the<br />
National Commission on Violence Against Women, Number 65 of 2005,<br />
10