SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“...any interpretation of 'obscenity' in the context of criminal offences must be in<br />
consonance with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression which<br />
freedom is not confined to the expression of ideas that are conventional or shared<br />
by the majority. Rather, it is most often ideas which question or challenge<br />
prevailing st<strong>and</strong>ards observed by the majority that face the greatest threat <strong>and</strong><br />
require the greatest protection ...” 767<br />
“Obscenity” as a <strong>legal</strong> term, has clearly been deliberately left undefined by lawmakers in<br />
order that it be left open to interpretation in relation to the contexts <strong>and</strong> the times in which it<br />
requires to be understood. From the judgments discussed above, it is evident that courts have<br />
done so in evolving principles that limit the application of obscenity laws <strong>and</strong> continuously<br />
evolve the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the notion of obscenity. But for the aforementioned case of BK<br />
Adarsh (which was notably decided 20 years ago) the authors have not come across cases<br />
where information related to sexual health per se has been contested as obscene before the<br />
courts. In the era of HIV <strong>and</strong> AIDS, it would seem fair to expect that sexual health<br />
information would pass the scrutiny of obscenity st<strong>and</strong>ards in law. However, in India for<br />
instance, this would be difficult to predict given the repeated outcries of certain sections of<br />
the public against the government introducing sex education in the schooling system there.<br />
In Bangladesh, the Penal Code contains provisions similar to those in the Indian Penal<br />
Code.<br />
In Thail<strong>and</strong>, the Criminal Code has a broad provision on obscenity that covers documents,<br />
drawings, prints, paintings, printed matter, pictures, posters, symbols, photographs,<br />
cinematograph films, noise tapes, picture tapes or any thing which is obscene. <strong>The</strong> law<br />
punishes the gamut of persons associated with such obscene materials including those who<br />
make, produce possess, bring into the country, trade in, distribute, exhibit, help circulate it,<br />
etc. 768<br />
Indonesia’s Penal Code contains offences against decency. 769 Specific provisions prescribe<br />
punishments for persons who knowingly disseminate, openly demonstrate or put up a writing,<br />
a portrait or an object “offensive to decency”; this includes producing importing conveying in<br />
transit, exporting, storing, openly or by dissemination in writing makes an unsolicited offer or<br />
indicates that such matter is procurable. 770 Punishment is also prescribed where the person<br />
does not know but has “serious reasons for suspecting” that the matter is offensive to<br />
decency.771 Offences related to decency are also detailed where the matter offensive to<br />
decency is shown or given to a minor as is showing matter that relates to a means to prevent<br />
or curb pregnancy. 772<br />
7.2 Regulation/censorship of sexual content (incl. internet)<br />
Censorship laws in the research countries mostly appear in the form of laws related to media<br />
<strong>and</strong> information technology.<br />
767 Ibid.<br />
768 Section 287, Criminal Code (Thail<strong>and</strong>) (Unofficial Translation)<br />
769 Chapter XIV, Crimes Against Decency, Penal Code, 1982 (Indonesia)<br />
770 Article 282(1) , Penal Code, 1982, (Indonesia)<br />
771 Article 282(2), ibid.<br />
772 Article 283, ibid.<br />
163