19.01.2014 Views

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

material or detain any person for this purpose. 499 Persons who fail to provide or provide false<br />

information to officers are liable to imprisonment. 500<br />

Child sexual abuse is addressed in India primarily through Sections 375 <strong>and</strong> 377 of the<br />

Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 375 provides that sexual intercourse with a girl under the<br />

age of 16 is rape regardless of her consent. In Sakshi v. Union of India & others 501 the<br />

Supreme Court of India deliberated on procedural aspects in child sexual abuse <strong>and</strong> rape<br />

cases <strong>and</strong> held that in trials of such cases the identity of the victim or witnesses for the<br />

prosecution should be able to be able to attend <strong>and</strong> participate in the trial in a manner that<br />

prevents the disclosure of their identity to the accused. Further questions put by the accused<br />

to the victim or witnesses should be given in writing to them in a clear manner which is not<br />

embarrassing.<br />

As discussed in the Chapter 2 on de-criminalisation of same-sex conduct, the Delhi High<br />

Court was asked to determine the constitutionality of Section 377 in so far as it covered adult,<br />

consensual, same sex conduct. 502 <strong>The</strong> reason for this limited plea by the petitioners (instead of<br />

asking for the entire provision to be struck down) was the fact that Section 377 is the only<br />

provision available in Indian law to address the sexual abuse of boys <strong>and</strong> non penile-vaginal<br />

sexual abuse of girls. Accordingly, the Delhi High Court only took adult, consensual samesex<br />

conduct out of the purview of Section 377 while urging the government to implement the<br />

Report of the Law Commission to update India’s law in sexual violence <strong>and</strong> provide for a<br />

proper provision related to child sexual abuse.<br />

India’s Information Technology Act, 2000 specifically punishes publication, transmission,<br />

browsing, downloading, exchanging or promoting of material in electronic form which<br />

depicts involved in sexually explicit acts or conduct. In 2008, the Act was amended to<br />

include, among other things, offences related to child pornography <strong>and</strong> child sexual abuse.<br />

<strong>The</strong> law punishes any person who cultivates, entices or induces children into an online<br />

relationship for purposes of indulging in a sexually explicit act or facilitates the abuse of<br />

children online. In relation to child pornography, the law punishes not only the transmission<br />

of material depicting children in sexually explicit conduct but also whoever “collects, seeks,<br />

browses, downloads, advertises, promotes, exchanges or distributes,” such material. An<br />

exception is carved out for publication which is proved to be justified for public good as it is<br />

in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or for bona fide heritage or religious<br />

purposes. A child is defined to be any person below the age of 18 years. 503<br />

Goa is the one state in India that has brought a child rights legislation into force, <strong>and</strong> its<br />

popularity as a tourist destination has played no small part in creating the impetus for this<br />

law, the Goa Children’s Act, 2003. This law is expansive in its coverage <strong>and</strong> touches on<br />

issues of, inter alia, sexual abuse, exploitation, <strong>and</strong> HIV. It lays down in broad terms the<br />

rights of the child <strong>and</strong> declares that the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the<br />

Child which has been acceded to by the Indian government are now the law in the state of<br />

499 Sections 34, 35, ibid.<br />

500 Section 37, ibid.<br />

501 AIR 2004 SC 3566<br />

502 Naz Foundation (India) Trust v Government of NCT of Delhi & others, WP(C) No.7455/2001 [Delhi High<br />

Court], Date of Decision: 2nd July, 2009<br />

503 Section 67B, Information Technology Act, 2000 (India)<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!