19.01.2014 Views

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

well as inheritance, property disposition, custody <strong>and</strong> control of children, visitation rights,<br />

<strong>and</strong> decision-making for incompetent patients.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se various regimes have grave impacts on the rights <strong>and</strong> sexual health of marriage<br />

partners, <strong>and</strong> are often gender-specific in their discriminatory effect. Many <strong>legal</strong> regimes<br />

governing entry <strong>and</strong> exit from marriage operate so that often women are not only denied<br />

bodily autonomy but also face conditions which undermine their sexual health: when they are<br />

coerced into marriage, or are compelled by custom or law when widowed to re-marry, or<br />

conversely when law or custom allows them to be shunned or otherwise socially ostracized<br />

after divorce or widow-hood. In places where sexual activity outside of marriage is strongly<br />

stigmatized, widowed or divorced women who are constrained from marriage may in effect<br />

be excluded from the ability to enjoy sexual relations in the future.<br />

Of particular importance to health are marriage regimes which treat married women as <strong>legal</strong><br />

minors or dissolve their rights into the rights <strong>and</strong> privileges of the male spouse, particularly<br />

those regimes which disallow women access to healthcare services (through requiring male or<br />

spousal consent); which bar in law or in practice prosecution or other intervention against an<br />

abusive spouse, including for coercive sex; or which restrict widows or divorced women from<br />

equal powers over property, inheritance, or control or decisions over children, etc. 181<br />

On a different note, constitutional or family law provisions that recognize or deny access to<br />

marriage to same sex couples not only heavily condition the way the state regulates sexuality<br />

<strong>and</strong> sexual life (see above, section 1), but also may either deny or grant specific health-related<br />

benefits based on marital status. In many countries, marriage defines the entitlement to a<br />

wide range of social rights <strong>and</strong> benefits; excluding same-sex partners from health benefits or<br />

other <strong>legal</strong> entitlements deprives them of services <strong>and</strong> conditions essential to the highest<br />

attainable st<strong>and</strong>ards of health because of relationship status or sexual orientation. 182<br />

Moreover, health <strong>and</strong> rights analyses increasingly highlight the need for recognition of<br />

alternative forms of family, as these varied forms of family provide important economic<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> social support to many people. States must ensure that access to appropriate<br />

services, as well as conditions of equality, security <strong>and</strong> freedom necessary for health for all<br />

members of the family, are available to all kinds of families. Families formed outside of<br />

marital or other intimate partner relationships, such as when a gr<strong>and</strong>parent or other kin cares<br />

for children of their extended family, need recognition <strong>and</strong> support, including appropriate<br />

authority to make decisions in the child’s best interest, <strong>and</strong> access to the means to ensure their<br />

sexual health <strong>and</strong> freedom from abuse.<br />

Because single women are often in this caregiver role in alternative families, sex-based<br />

discrimination against the caregiver has negative effects on the well-being of children. Samesex<br />

couples who are raising children <strong>and</strong> whose relationship is not recognized as a marriage<br />

also fall into this concern for alternative families. Conversely, persons in alternative families<br />

who face domestic violence or sexual exploitation (as when members of extended families<br />

work as domestics, e.g.) also need to be recognized as persons deserving of <strong>legal</strong><br />

181 [from S. Fabeni, 5-2009 Concept paper for WHO]<br />

182 Notably, some state regimes allocating social benefits conditional to marriage may also deny unmarried,<br />

cohabiting heterosexual partners access to benefits; others accept unmarried cohabiting heterosexual partners as<br />

akin to spouses (if meeting other conditions such as duration of cohabitation) for the purpose of benefits. Such<br />

disparate treatment—particularly in regard to pensions, access to housing <strong>and</strong> other conditions for health-- have<br />

been determined to be discriminatory. (see§§§ international human rights <strong>and</strong> Young v Australia)<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!