19.01.2014 Views

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was married to she would acquire immense wealth, which would be unfair <strong>and</strong> inappropriate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> government argued in support of the laws stating that they were in consonance with a<br />

previous court order, which sought to achieve gender equality, especially in the Nepalese<br />

context where patriarchy had created severe discrimination against women. <strong>The</strong> Supreme<br />

Court found that the provisions did violate the right to equality but it refused to invalidate the<br />

law <strong>and</strong> instead directed the government to conduct extensive consultations <strong>and</strong> research on<br />

the issue with relevant stakeholders, <strong>and</strong> thereafter to enact a more appropriate bill.<br />

Nepalese law recognises various types of property that a woman acquires in her capacity as a<br />

daughter or wife (known as stri amshadhan) <strong>and</strong> these include property given to a woman by<br />

her parental or maternal relatives (known as daijo) <strong>and</strong> property given by the husb<strong>and</strong> or his<br />

relatives (known as pewa). 203 Earlier, a woman had only limited rights in relation to such<br />

property - she could enjoy <strong>and</strong> use all such property but could not dispose of more than half<br />

of the immoveable property on her own. To dispose of the rest she needed the consent of her<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> or children (men did not have such restrictions in disposing of their property). <strong>The</strong><br />

Eleventh Amendment to the Country Code significantly reformed these discriminatory<br />

provisions against women. As a result of public interest petitions filed before it, the Supreme<br />

Court found the provisions of law as ultra vires the constitutional guarantee of equality in<br />

relation to women. 204 <strong>The</strong> law has been amended since <strong>and</strong> now allows a woman to act<br />

unilaterally to dispose of such property. 205<br />

Despite significant improvements in the Country Code that assure rights <strong>and</strong> protection from<br />

women vis-à-vis property, discriminatory provisions continue to exist. For instance, unlike<br />

men who have the entitlement, married women are not entitled to a share in their parental<br />

property. 206 Similarly, in matters of intestate succession the law continues to place married<br />

daughters at considerable distance in the line of succession. 207<br />

Sri Lanka is governed by multifarious personal laws based on religious <strong>and</strong> community<br />

roots. K<strong>and</strong>yan Law applies to ethnic Sinhalese whose can trace their lineage back to the<br />

K<strong>and</strong>yan provinces during the period of the K<strong>and</strong>yan monarchy in central Sri Lanka. (the<br />

K<strong>and</strong>yan monarchy ceased to exist with the British takeover of central Sri Lanka in 1815).<br />

<strong>The</strong>swalamai Law is based on customs of Jaffna Tamils in Sri Lanka. It applies to Tamil<br />

inhabitants of the Jaffna Peninsula in Northern Sri Lanka or to Jaffna Tamils who live<br />

203 Recognised in clause 4 of the Chapter on Women’s Exclusive Property, Nepal Country Code, 1963. <strong>The</strong><br />

authors did not have access to the original text or an English translation of this law <strong>and</strong> relied on an unpublished<br />

study <strong>and</strong> analysis on sexuality <strong>and</strong> rights undertaken by the Forum for Women, Law & Development, which<br />

was made available to the authors.<br />

204<br />

Prakashmani Sharma v Government of Nepal. <strong>The</strong> authors did not have access to the original text or an<br />

English translation of this judgment <strong>and</strong> relied on an unpublished study <strong>and</strong> analysis on sexuality <strong>and</strong> rights<br />

undertaken by the Forum for Women, Law & Development, which was made available to the authors.<br />

205<br />

Clause 2, Chapter on Women’s Exclusive Property, Nepal Country Code, 1963. <strong>The</strong> authors did not have<br />

access to the original text or an English translation of this law <strong>and</strong> relied on an unpublished study <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />

on sexuality <strong>and</strong> rights undertaken by the Forum for Women, Law & Development, which was made available<br />

to the authors.<br />

206 Clause 1A, Chapter on Partition of Property, Nepal Country Code, 1963. <strong>The</strong> authors did not have access to<br />

the original text or an English translation of this law <strong>and</strong> relied on an unpublished study <strong>and</strong> analysis on<br />

sexuality <strong>and</strong> rights undertaken by the Forum for Women, Law & Development, which was made available to<br />

the authors.<br />

207 Clauses 3,6,7 & 9, Chapter on Intestate Property, Nepal Country Code, 1963. <strong>The</strong> authors did not have<br />

access to the original text or an English translation of this law <strong>and</strong> relied on an unpublished study <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />

on sexuality <strong>and</strong> rights undertaken by the Forum for Women, Law & Development, which was made available<br />

to the authors.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!