SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
have provisions criminalizing same-sex sexual activity. 140 In 2007, Thail<strong>and</strong> introduced<br />
amendments to its rape laws that recognized same sex sexual assault. 141<br />
<strong>The</strong> extent of criminalization in Sri Lanka is extraordinary. Section 365 of the Sri Lankan<br />
Penal Code criminalises “unnatural” offences <strong>and</strong> provides that any person who “voluntarily<br />
has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman, or animal” shall be<br />
punished with imprisonment of up to ten years. Punishment is enhanced from 10 to up to 20<br />
years in cases where the offence is committed by a person over 18 years of age in respect of<br />
another person under 16 years <strong>and</strong> the court is empowered to grant compensation to the<br />
person in respect of whom the offence is committed for injuries (including psychological or<br />
mental trauma) caused to such a person. An explanation provides that penetration is sufficient<br />
to constitute carnal intercourse. 142<br />
However, this Sri Lankan law goes on to further penalize acts of “gross indecency between<br />
persons” under Section 365A. This provides imprisonment for anyone who commits,<br />
participates in the commission of, procures or attempts to procure “the commission by any<br />
person of any act of gross indecency with another person”. Punishment is enhanced from to 2<br />
to up to 20 years in cases where the offence is committed by a person over 18 years of age in<br />
respect of another person under 16 years <strong>and</strong> the court is empowered to grant compensation<br />
to the person in respect of whom the offence is committed for injuries (including<br />
psychological or mental trauma) caused to such a person. 143 Importantly, here penetration is<br />
not required to constitute the act of “gross indecency” <strong>and</strong> nowhere does the law even suggest<br />
that a sexual act is meant to be covered. However, the intent of the legislature was to cover<br />
sexual acts not covered by Section 365 in order to include lesbians within the ambit of<br />
criminalization. Section 365A was legislated for that purpose. 144<br />
Amongst the research countries only the criminal laws of Indonesia <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> contain<br />
specific provisions on non-consensual same-sex sexual activity. 145<br />
<strong>The</strong> de-criminalization of consensual same-sex sexual conduct is at various stages in the<br />
research countries. Those countries that were British colonies (i.e. India, Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Sri<br />
Lanka) inherited this <strong>legal</strong> framework from the British <strong>and</strong> have struggled with its removal.<br />
Indeed, the Indian judgment striking down the anti-sodomy law recognizes that the<br />
criminalization of same-sex sexual conduct discriminates against homosexuals <strong>and</strong> its<br />
existence has a negative impact on homosexuals’ health 146 . However it remains to be seen if<br />
this will lead to further recognition <strong>and</strong> expansion of anti-discrimination laws based on sexual<br />
orientation in India or whether the ruling will have a ripple effect in neighboring<br />
140 See S<strong>and</strong>ers, Douglas, ‘377 - <strong>and</strong> the unnatural afterlife of British colonialism,’ Paper presented at the 5 th<br />
Asian Law Institute Conference National University of Singapore, May 22 <strong>and</strong> 23, 2008.<br />
141 See Thail<strong>and</strong> Criminal Code Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 (2007). See also Chapter 5 on Violence.<br />
142 Section 365, Penal Code, 1883 (Sri Lanka)<br />
143 Section 365A, ibid.<br />
144 Section 365A as it stood previously only covered acts between males. It stated: “Any male person who, in<br />
public or private, commits, or is parly [sic] to the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the<br />
commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be guilty of an<br />
offence, <strong>and</strong> shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two<br />
years or with fine or with both, <strong>and</strong> shall also be liable to be punished with whipping.” It was amended in 1995<br />
to remove any reference to male persons thereby covering females as well.<br />
145 See Chapter 5 on Violence<br />
146 Naz Foundation (India) Trust v Government of NCT of Delhi & others, WP(C) No.7455/2001 [Delhi High<br />
Court], Date of Decision: 2nd July, 2009<br />
50