19.01.2014 Views

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS A legal and ... - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Indeed, laws criminalizing intentional transmission of any life-threatening disease are<br />

required in order to deter persons from dangerous conduct. With the exception of Nepal it is<br />

interesting to note that the other research countries with such laws have provisions which predate<br />

HIV. Yet, they cast culpability in imprecise, broad terms – “unlawfully”, “negligently” –<br />

thereby failing to envisage situations which blur behavior deemed to be responsible or not<br />

(the use of a condom or the obtaining of consent in cases of sexual conduct). <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />

there is virtually no judicial decision applying such laws to sexual conduct then begs the<br />

question whether such laws are of any value in relation to such conduct. Additionally, it is<br />

worth enquiring whether such laws as they relate to HIV (e.g. the Nepal law) are applicable<br />

in a context where anti-retroviral treatment has transformed HIV from a life-threatening<br />

condition to a chronic illness. Moreover, in the case of Nepal it is unclear why such<br />

criminality has only been provided in cases of rape – does this imply that sexual conduct<br />

which is consensual assumes that persons involved are well aware that a consequence of such<br />

conduct could be HIV infection? Or that information of a partner’s HIV status is not a<br />

material fact that impacts free <strong>and</strong> informed consent? If so, does the law adequately recognize<br />

the ability (or lack thereof) of a partner, particularly a woman, to give informed consent to<br />

sexual conduct?<br />

2.3 Age of consent/statutory rape<br />

<strong>The</strong> age of consent for sex differs in the research countries.<br />

In Bangladesh, for an unmarried girl it is 16, whereas if she is married the age of consent for<br />

sex is 15. 151 In Sri Lanka the age of sexual consent is 16 years of age for males <strong>and</strong> females,<br />

although for married females it is 12. 152 In Nepal the marriageable age for both males <strong>and</strong><br />

females is 20 years of age. <strong>The</strong> age of consent for sex is 16 years. 153<br />

In India, the age of consent for sex for unmarried girls is 16 <strong>and</strong> for married girls 15. 154 <strong>The</strong><br />

age of consent for boys for same-sex sexual activity is 18 as a result of the Delhi High Court<br />

judgment de-criminalising same-sex sexual conduct, where the court ruled, “We declare that<br />

Section 377 IPC, insofar it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults in private, is<br />

violative of Articles 21, 14 <strong>and</strong> 15 of the Constitution…By 'adult' we mean everyone who is<br />

18 years of age <strong>and</strong> above.” 155<br />

In a few cases before the Indian courts, the matter of consensual sex involving a minor has<br />

arisen. In the case of Ramvir v. State 156 the Delhi High Court determined that the girl in<br />

question was approximately 15 years old when the incident took place <strong>and</strong> that the facts <strong>and</strong><br />

circumstances indicated that she had consented to the sexual intercourse. <strong>The</strong> court upheld<br />

151 See the Suppression of Violence Against Women <strong>and</strong> Children Act, 2000. <strong>The</strong> age of consent for sex for<br />

boys is unclear.<br />

152 Sections 363 <strong>and</strong> 365B, Penal Code, 1883 (Sri Lanka). Notably, clause 3.11 of Sri Lanka’s National<br />

HIV/AIDS Policy states that, “… steps shall be taken to prevent persons from willfully <strong>and</strong> knowingly infecting<br />

HIV to other persons.”<br />

153 It should be noted that the authors did not have access to these provisions. This information is based on an<br />

unpublished study <strong>and</strong> analysis on sexuality <strong>and</strong> rights undertaken by the Forum for Women, Law &<br />

Development, which was made available to the authors.<br />

154 Section 275, Indian Penal Code, 1860<br />

155 Naz Foundation (India) Trust v. Government of Delhi <strong>and</strong> another WP(C) No.7455/2001 [Delhi High Court],<br />

Date of Decision: 2nd July, 2009<br />

156 MANU/DE/2795/2009<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!