Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
46 3. Intensive Monitoring<br />
in beech stands because stemflow was not taken into account in the present study as it had not<br />
been measured continuously from 1998 to 2007 on most plots.<br />
The observed annual mean throughfall deposition is interpreted always together with the<br />
respective bulk deposition in order to allow for an estimation of effective enriching and reducing<br />
canopy effects. The plot specific annual sums of bulk and throughfall deposition of nitrate<br />
(NO 3 ), ammonium (NH 4 + ), sulphate (SO 4 2- ), calcium (Ca 2+ ), sodium (Na + ), and chlorine (Cl - )<br />
were basis for the evaluations. Bulk and throughfall depositions expressed in kg ha -1 yr -1 in the<br />
text and in the figures refer to the chemical element considered, e.g. to sulphur (S-SO 4 2- ) instead<br />
of sulphate (SO 4 2- ).<br />
Data selection criteria and calculations follow the approach already described by LORENZ et al.<br />
(2005) for the calculation of deposition data from 1996 to 2001. The numbers of plots with<br />
available data fulfilling the selection criteria for mean annual deposition calculations from the<br />
year 2005 to 2007 are presented in table 3.2.1-1. In addition to mean annual deposition rates, the<br />
development of throughfall and bulk deposition over time was object of the present study. The<br />
slope of plot specific linear regression over the years of observation was used for mapping and<br />
quantifying the general temporal devolpments. Whereas in previous reports temporal trends<br />
were presented for 6 consecutive years, this evaluation prolongs the period to a time span of 10<br />
years, i.e. to the years from 1998 – 2007. Due to the continuously ongoing monitoring activities<br />
this prolongation still resulted in a satisfying high number and spatial resolution of plots<br />
fulfilling the selection criteria (Table 3.2.1-1).<br />
Table 3.2.1-1: Number of plots which fulfilled the selection criteria.<br />
No. of observations Na + Cl - Ca 2+ +<br />
N-NH 4<br />
-<br />
N- NO 3<br />
2-<br />
S- SO 4<br />
Trend<br />
Bulk 155 156 155 155 156 151<br />
1998 – 2007 Throughfall 163 164 163 163 164 157<br />
Mean<br />
Bulk 288 288 288 288 288 288<br />
2005 – 2007 Throughfall 215 214 215 215 215 215<br />
Throughfall<br />
> Bulk<br />
169<br />
of 205<br />
179<br />
of 204<br />
187<br />
of 205<br />
131<br />
of 205<br />
162<br />
of 205<br />
168<br />
of 205<br />
The slopes of the linear equations were statistically tested and depicted in maps according to the<br />
following classification:<br />
Decrease: negative slope, error probability lower or equal 5% (green)<br />
No change: negative slope with error probability greater than 5%, or same deposition in<br />
each year, or positive slope with error probability greater than 5% (yellow)<br />
Increase: positive slope, error probability lower or equal 5% (red)<br />
Even with an enlarged time span of ten years, results must be understood as a mere description<br />
of the changes over time rather than a trend analysis which would require an even longer period<br />
of observation and respective statistical models for time series analyses.<br />
Sulphate is an important constituent of sea salt, and in many coastal areas (e.g. western Norway)<br />
most sulphate in deposition may originate from sea salt rather than anthropogenic sources. As<br />
the relationship between chloride and sulphate in sea water is almost constant and assuming that<br />
chloride is almost entirely derived from sea salt and hardly affected by biogeochemical<br />
processes (which may not always be correct), measured sulphate concentrations can be easily<br />
corrected for the sea salt contribution using the formula<br />
non-marine S-SO 4 2- = total S-SO 4 2- - (0.054 * Cl - ) ; where all values are in mg/l.