19.01.2014 Views

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 3. Intensive Monitoring<br />

in beech stands because stemflow was not taken into account in the present study as it had not<br />

been measured continuously from 1998 to 2007 on most plots.<br />

The observed annual mean throughfall deposition is interpreted always together with the<br />

respective bulk deposition in order to allow for an estimation of effective enriching and reducing<br />

canopy effects. The plot specific annual sums of bulk and throughfall deposition of nitrate<br />

(NO 3 ), ammonium (NH 4 + ), sulphate (SO 4 2- ), calcium (Ca 2+ ), sodium (Na + ), and chlorine (Cl - )<br />

were basis for the evaluations. Bulk and throughfall depositions expressed in kg ha -1 yr -1 in the<br />

text and in the figures refer to the chemical element considered, e.g. to sulphur (S-SO 4 2- ) instead<br />

of sulphate (SO 4 2- ).<br />

Data selection criteria and calculations follow the approach already described by LORENZ et al.<br />

(2005) for the calculation of deposition data from 1996 to 2001. The numbers of plots with<br />

available data fulfilling the selection criteria for mean annual deposition calculations from the<br />

year 2005 to 2007 are presented in table 3.2.1-1. In addition to mean annual deposition rates, the<br />

development of throughfall and bulk deposition over time was object of the present study. The<br />

slope of plot specific linear regression over the years of observation was used for mapping and<br />

quantifying the general temporal devolpments. Whereas in previous reports temporal trends<br />

were presented for 6 consecutive years, this evaluation prolongs the period to a time span of 10<br />

years, i.e. to the years from 1998 – 2007. Due to the continuously ongoing monitoring activities<br />

this prolongation still resulted in a satisfying high number and spatial resolution of plots<br />

fulfilling the selection criteria (Table 3.2.1-1).<br />

Table 3.2.1-1: Number of plots which fulfilled the selection criteria.<br />

No. of observations Na + Cl - Ca 2+ +<br />

N-NH 4<br />

-<br />

N- NO 3<br />

2-<br />

S- SO 4<br />

Trend<br />

Bulk 155 156 155 155 156 151<br />

1998 – 2007 Throughfall 163 164 163 163 164 157<br />

Mean<br />

Bulk 288 288 288 288 288 288<br />

2005 – 2007 Throughfall 215 214 215 215 215 215<br />

Throughfall<br />

> Bulk<br />

169<br />

of 205<br />

179<br />

of 204<br />

187<br />

of 205<br />

131<br />

of 205<br />

162<br />

of 205<br />

168<br />

of 205<br />

The slopes of the linear equations were statistically tested and depicted in maps according to the<br />

following classification:<br />

Decrease: negative slope, error probability lower or equal 5% (green)<br />

No change: negative slope with error probability greater than 5%, or same deposition in<br />

each year, or positive slope with error probability greater than 5% (yellow)<br />

Increase: positive slope, error probability lower or equal 5% (red)<br />

Even with an enlarged time span of ten years, results must be understood as a mere description<br />

of the changes over time rather than a trend analysis which would require an even longer period<br />

of observation and respective statistical models for time series analyses.<br />

Sulphate is an important constituent of sea salt, and in many coastal areas (e.g. western Norway)<br />

most sulphate in deposition may originate from sea salt rather than anthropogenic sources. As<br />

the relationship between chloride and sulphate in sea water is almost constant and assuming that<br />

chloride is almost entirely derived from sea salt and hardly affected by biogeochemical<br />

processes (which may not always be correct), measured sulphate concentrations can be easily<br />

corrected for the sea salt contribution using the formula<br />

non-marine S-SO 4 2- = total S-SO 4 2- - (0.054 * Cl - ) ; where all values are in mg/l.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!