Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76 3. Intensive Monitoring<br />
the one that leads to the highest increase in explained variance with the constraint that variables<br />
with a correlation |R| > 0.5 with variables already in the model are skipped. Variable selection<br />
was stopped when none remained that could significantly (P < 0.05) improve the fit of the<br />
model. The resulting 'minimal' model explains 12.5% variance which is quite usual in this type<br />
of ecological data. pH is the most important explanatory variable, which is also usual in this<br />
type of data. There is a small, but highly significant effect of deposition quantified as the<br />
EMEP-estimated NO 3 deposition for 2000. The model is summarised in Table 3.4.4-3. The<br />
results strongly agree with those of De Vries at al. (2002) with the traditional factors (in the<br />
order: tree layer, soil, climate) as the most important explanatory variables, and c. 5% of the<br />
variance in the fitted values explained by deposition. However, in contrast to the 2002 analysis<br />
this effect of deposition is solely due to N-deposition and not partly to e.g. seawater ions.<br />
Table 3.4.4-1: Percentage explained variance due to countries and 'real' environmental variables<br />
source<br />
TMV<br />
uniquely due to countries 5,0%<br />
uniquely due to environmental variables 14,1%<br />
undetermined 6,3%<br />
total variance explained 25,4%<br />
Table 3.4.4-2: Result of forward selection of environmental variables to explain the vegetation of the last relevé of<br />
each plot, using EMEP estimates to quantify deposition and using the countries as covariables. Eigenvalues: λ 1 =<br />
0.259, λ 2 = 0.24, λ 3 = 0.188, λ 4 = 0.125, Σλ = 11.739, Number of plots = 477, number of species = 170. Rare species<br />
are downweighted. F = (regression mean square with this term - regression mean square without this term) / error<br />
mean square; P = probability of this, or a higher F-value under the null hypothesis as determined on the basis of 999<br />
bootstrap samples.<br />
Variable<br />
compartment<br />
F P percentage<br />
explained<br />
variance<br />
pH organic 8,1 0,001 1,70%<br />
mediterr. oak tree 6,79 0,001 1,45%<br />
temperate oak tree 5,95 0,001 1,28%<br />
Pinus sylv+nigra tree 4,83 0,001 1,02%<br />
Fagus tree 4,42 0,001 0,94%<br />
CEC mineral 2,84 0,001 0,60%<br />
N/C organic 2,46 0,005 0,51%<br />
Latitude climate 2,44 0,001 0,43%<br />
NO3 (2000) deposition 2,36 0,001 0,51%<br />
Longitude climate 2,28 0,001 0,51%<br />
coniferous 'other' tree 2,23 0,003 0,43%<br />
deciduous 'other' tree 2,13 0,061 0,43%<br />
Ca organic 2,1 0,002 0,43%<br />
Atlantic South climate 1,96 0,008 0,43%<br />
Age tree 1,89 0,003 0,34%<br />
Atlantic North climate 1,85 0,005 0,34%<br />
K organic 1,87 0,011 0,43%<br />
Boreal climate 1,72 0,012 0,34%<br />
P organic 1,7 0,007 0,34%<br />
Altitude 1,36 0,092 0,26%<br />
N_C_min 1,23 0,173 0,26%<br />
(further terms not given)<br />
SUM if P < 0.05 12,44%