19.01.2014 Views

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Intensive Monitoring 73<br />

Element source Number<br />

of plots<br />

Logaritmised?<br />

Outlier<br />

corrected?<br />

Skewness<br />

after<br />

correction<br />

Na throughfall 278 yes no -0,502<br />

Cl throughfall 278 yes no -0,665<br />

NH4 throughfall 278 yes no -0,869<br />

NO3 throughfall 278 no no 1,199<br />

SO4 throughfall 278 no no 1,61<br />

Ntot throughfall 278 no no 1,36<br />

NH4 calculated 265 no no 1,623<br />

NO3 calculated 265 no no 1,454<br />

Ntot NH4+NO3 (calc.) 265 no no 1,51<br />

Deposition data<br />

Deposition was calculated as the product of rainfall or throughfall quantity per two- or fourweek<br />

period and the concentration per element over that period, and recalculated to yearly<br />

averages. Deposition per plot was determined as the average of the years where sufficient data<br />

were available. Only those years were included that had data for at least 80% of that year. In<br />

many cases, there were missing values for individual elements, specifically for NH 4 , and this led<br />

to many missing years. Among the 619 plots with both vegetation and soil data, there are 414<br />

with bulk deposition data, 278 with throughfall data, and 265 with both. An overview of the<br />

numbers of plots with either bulk or throughfall data, and their pre-treatment, is given in Table<br />

3.4.2-4B. These plots have deposition measured over periods that differ in length and position in<br />

time, but as trends in N deposition were not significant, we assumed that the years for which<br />

deposition data are available are a good estimate for the deposition over the period where<br />

vegetation data are available.<br />

Because measured deposition was available for only a subset of all plots, deposition estimates<br />

for NH 4 , NO 3 and SO 4 for 1995, 2000 and 2010 were also derived by overlaying the plot<br />

locations with results of the Eulerian atmospheric transport model of EMEP/MSC-W at a 50 km<br />

x 50 km grid cell size (Tarrasón et al., 2007). Annex 3.4.2 gives the correlation coefficients<br />

between EMEP deposition estimates for 2000 and measured bulk and throughfall deposition.<br />

Correlations coefficients are in the order R ≈ 0.6 for both N and S. For both EMEP estimates<br />

and bulk and throughfall deposition, N-total was calculated as the sum of NH 4 + NO 3 . In<br />

addition, dry deposition of NH 4 and NO 3 was estimated on the basis of the difference between<br />

bulk and throughfall deposition, assuming a conservative behaviour of Na; this is referred to as<br />

'calculated' deposition.<br />

Other data<br />

Climatic zones were assigned to each plot on the basis of its geographical position according to<br />

De Vries et al (2002). Moreover the following data were taken from the database:<br />

- country;<br />

- latitude and longitude;<br />

- stand age (classes recalculated to 'real' age as code * 20, code 8 ('irregular stands') replaced by<br />

70);<br />

- altitude (classes recalculated to 'real' altitude as code * 50 and logarithmised to correct for<br />

skewness);<br />

- tree species: these were clustered as presented in Table 3.4.2-1. For Quercus, the temperate<br />

and mediterranean species were taken together. Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra were taken<br />

together. Fagus sylvatica and Picea excelsa were used as such. All other species were lumped to<br />

'coniferous' and 'deciduous'.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!