Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. Intensive Monitoring 71<br />
Relevés<br />
The analysis was based on a single relevé for each combination of plot and year. If there were<br />
data from more than one subplot (called 'survey' in the database) at a given date, the subplots<br />
were combined by taking the average cover per species. If there were data from more than one<br />
date within a given year, these were combined by taking the maximum cover per species over all<br />
these dates. Relevés taken in fenced plots were not used. The tree layer was not considered as a<br />
part of the spontaneous vegetation and not used in the analysis. The moss and lichen layer was<br />
left out of consideration because it was not recorded by all countries. For technical reasons<br />
species with cover percentages < 0.005% (possibly after averaging over subplots) were left out<br />
of consideration. Relevés without any species (possibly after the above operations) were also<br />
left out of consideration for technical reasons. For the multivariate analyses cover percentages<br />
were ln(X+1) transformed.<br />
Soil data<br />
The database contains a wide range of chemical data from a wide range of horizons. Missing<br />
values occur for some variables. In principle, chemical values have been computed as the<br />
average over the complete organic layer, and as the average over 0 - 20 cm depth in the mineral<br />
layer. The following soil chemical variables were used:<br />
- in the organic layer: pH(CaCl 2 ); extractable (mostly by extraction with 0.1 M BaCl 2 ) Ca, K,<br />
Mg, P; and C-total, N-total;<br />
- in the mineral layer: pH(CaCl 2 ), CEC, base saturation, C-total, N-total.<br />
If there were data from more than one year of a given plot, only the last year was used. pH<br />
values were averaged after exponentiation. N/C ratios were computed as (N-total) / (C-total) for<br />
both the organic and the mineral layer. Missing values have been treated as follows:<br />
- records with missing values for pH(CaCl 2 ) in either the mineral or the organic layer were not<br />
used;<br />
- records with missing values for more than one variable were not used;<br />
- occasional missing values in other variables were estimated on the basis of their correlation<br />
with a single other variable (see Table 3.4.2-4 for details).<br />
The chemical data were checked for normality and outliers. Normality was achieved by<br />
logarithmisation, occasional outliers were corrected to their nearest value (max. one per<br />
variable). Details are given in Table 3.4.2-4A.