19.01.2014 Views

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82 3. Intensive Monitoring<br />

Table 3.4.4-7: Change in mean Ellenberg indicator value (+ number of species) between the first and last relevé.<br />

Only relevés made at intervals of > 6 years were used. Mean = mean value over both observation dates, N = number<br />

of observations (i.e., number of plots with Ellenberg value present in both years), Diff = MEAN [(Ellenberg value<br />

in last relevé) - (Ellenberg value in first relevé)], T = t-value of difference, P = P-value of difference.<br />

Indicator Mean N Diff T P<br />

light (L) 5,0 152 0,016 0,489 0,63<br />

temperature (T) 5,3 113 0,000 0,002 1,00<br />

continentality (K) 3,4 141 -0,023 -0,972 0,33<br />

humidity (F) 5,2 128 0,046 1,648 0,10<br />

acidity (R) 5,5 112 -0,013 -0,287 0,77<br />

nutrients (N) 5,2 122 0,107 2,569 0,01<br />

number of species 11,8 161 1,410 4,742 0,00<br />

Table 3.4.4-8: 'Minimal' model to explain the change in Ellenberg's N using EMEP deposition estimates in the<br />

initial 'full' model. TMV = Top Marginal Variance = the drop in explain variance when omitting this term from the<br />

model. Significance: the sign is the sign of the regression coefficient, absolute value: 1 = P < 0.05, 2 = P < 0.01, 3 =<br />

P < 0.001. N = 99. The negative 'unexplained' variance is due to interaction effects.<br />

Variable<br />

TMV<br />

Latitude climate 7,80% -2<br />

Fagus tree 4,19% -1<br />

mediterr. oak tree 6,01% -2<br />

NO3 (1995) EMEP 8,65% 2<br />

undetermined -14,50%<br />

total expl.<br />

var. 12,14%<br />

Table 3.4.4-10: 'Minimal' model to explain the change in the number of species. EMEP deposition estimates were<br />

included in the 'full' model however removed in the selection process because their effect was not significant. N =<br />

133. Further explanation see Table 3.4.4-8.<br />

Variable<br />

TMV<br />

Compartment<br />

significance<br />

Table 3.4.4-9: 'Minimal' model to explain the change in Ellenberg's N, using throughfall, bulk, calculated and<br />

EMEP estimated deposition as terms in the initial 'full' model. Explanation see Table 3.4.4-8. N = 42.<br />

Variable Compartment<br />

TMV significance<br />

Ca organic 7,22 1<br />

N/C mineral 13,09 -2<br />

Fagus tree 17,29 -2<br />

mediterr. oak tree 15,22 -2<br />

Latitude climate 29,29 -3<br />

NO3 throughfall 12,87 2<br />

NO3 (1995) EMEP 7,41 1<br />

undetermined -64,37<br />

total expl. var. 38,03<br />

Compartment<br />

significance<br />

K organic 10,34 3<br />

CEC mineral 13,14 3<br />

Mediterranean climate 6,77 -2<br />

undetermined -9,05<br />

total expl. var. 21,2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!