Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
Report - ICP Forests
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
70 3. Intensive Monitoring<br />
Country Number of plots<br />
Slovenia 11<br />
Spain 53<br />
Sweden 98<br />
Switzerland 16<br />
United Kingdom 10<br />
SUM 776<br />
Table 3.4.1-2: Number of relevés per plot<br />
Number of relevés Number of plots<br />
1 378<br />
2 159<br />
3 150<br />
4 37<br />
5 13<br />
6 11<br />
7 17<br />
8 11<br />
SUM 776<br />
Table 3.4.1-3: Interval between the first and last relevé per plot<br />
Interval (years) Number of plots<br />
0 378<br />
1 24<br />
2 10<br />
3 20<br />
4 33<br />
5 104<br />
6 24<br />
7 50<br />
8 5<br />
9 5<br />
10 94<br />
11 29<br />
SUM 776<br />
3.4.2 Material and Methods<br />
Species<br />
All species were used as given in the database with the following exceptions:<br />
- 'extra' species added by the individual countries were removed;<br />
- all Rubus species with the exception of R. idaeus, R. caesius, R. saxatilis, R. chamaemorus and<br />
R. arcticus were taken together as R. fruticosus;<br />
- all Alchemilla species except A. alpina were taken together as A. vulgaris.<br />
The numerical codes used in the database were converted into eight-digit codes following the<br />
Dutch 'Biobase' database (Van Duuren et al. 2003) as far as possible. New codes were generated<br />
for species not in Biobase and manually adapted if necessary to achieve unicity. The<br />
correspondence of the Ellenberg database (Ellenberg 1991) and the <strong>ICP</strong> database was checked<br />
on the level of the full species names; codes were adapted if necessary. Annex 3.4.1 gives a full<br />
list of all species and their codes used in this project.