19.01.2014 Views

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

Report - ICP Forests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 3. Intensive Monitoring<br />

Country Number of plots<br />

Slovenia 11<br />

Spain 53<br />

Sweden 98<br />

Switzerland 16<br />

United Kingdom 10<br />

SUM 776<br />

Table 3.4.1-2: Number of relevés per plot<br />

Number of relevés Number of plots<br />

1 378<br />

2 159<br />

3 150<br />

4 37<br />

5 13<br />

6 11<br />

7 17<br />

8 11<br />

SUM 776<br />

Table 3.4.1-3: Interval between the first and last relevé per plot<br />

Interval (years) Number of plots<br />

0 378<br />

1 24<br />

2 10<br />

3 20<br />

4 33<br />

5 104<br />

6 24<br />

7 50<br />

8 5<br />

9 5<br />

10 94<br />

11 29<br />

SUM 776<br />

3.4.2 Material and Methods<br />

Species<br />

All species were used as given in the database with the following exceptions:<br />

- 'extra' species added by the individual countries were removed;<br />

- all Rubus species with the exception of R. idaeus, R. caesius, R. saxatilis, R. chamaemorus and<br />

R. arcticus were taken together as R. fruticosus;<br />

- all Alchemilla species except A. alpina were taken together as A. vulgaris.<br />

The numerical codes used in the database were converted into eight-digit codes following the<br />

Dutch 'Biobase' database (Van Duuren et al. 2003) as far as possible. New codes were generated<br />

for species not in Biobase and manually adapted if necessary to achieve unicity. The<br />

correspondence of the Ellenberg database (Ellenberg 1991) and the <strong>ICP</strong> database was checked<br />

on the level of the full species names; codes were adapted if necessary. Annex 3.4.1 gives a full<br />

list of all species and their codes used in this project.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!