improving music mood classification using lyrics, audio and social tags

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Laurier, C., Grivolla, J., & Herrera, P. (2008). Multimodal music mood classification using audio and lyrics. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications ( ICMLA' 08). Dec. 2008, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 688-693. Lee, J. H., & Downie, J. S. (2004). Survey of music information needs, uses, and seeking behaviours: preliminary findings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’04), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 441-446. Levy, M., & Sandler, M. (2007). A semantic space for music derived from social tags. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’07). Sep. 2007, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://ismir2007.ismir.net/proceedings/ISMIR2007_p411_levy.pdf on September 18, 2008. Li, T., & Ogihara, M. (2003). Detecting emotion in music. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’03). Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp. 239-240. Li, T., & Ogihara, M. (2004). Semi-supervised learning from different information sources. Knowledge and Information Systems, 7(3): 289-309. Liu, H., Lieberman, H., & Selker, T. (2003). A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York, NY, USA. pp. 125-132. Logan, B., Kositsky, A., & Moreno, P. (2004). Semantic analysis of song lyrics. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME'04). Jun. 2004, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 827- 830. Lu, L., Liu, D., & Zhang, H. (2006). Automatic mood detection and tracking of music audio signals. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 14(1): 5-18. Mahedero, J. P. G., Martinez, A., Cano, P., Koppenberger, M., & Gouyon, F. (2005). Natural language processing of lyrics. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA’05). New York, NY, USA, pp. 475- 478. Mandel, M., & Ellis, D. (2007). A web-based game for collecting music metadata. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR '07). Sep. 2007, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://ismir2007.ismir.net/proceedings/ISMIR2007_p365_mandel.pdf on September 18, 2008. Mandel, M., Poliner, G., & Ellis, D. (2006). Support vector machine active learning for music retrieval. Multimedia Systems, 12 (1): 3-13. Mayer, R., Neumayer, R., & Rauber, A. (2008). Rhyme and style features for musical genre categorisation by song lyrics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’08). Sep. 2008, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 337-342. 121
McEnnis, D., McKay, C., Fujinaga, I., & Depalle, P. (2005). jAudio: A feature extraction library. In Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’06). Sep. 2005, London, UK, pp. 600-603. McKay, C., & Fujinaga, I. (2008). Combining features extracted from audio, symbolic and cultural sources. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’08). Sep. 2008, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 597-602. McKay, C., McEnnis, D., & Fujinaga. I. (2006). A large publicly accessible prototype audio database for music research. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR’06). Oct. 2006, Victoria, Canada, pp. 160 – 163. Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: a general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 14: 261-292. Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mihalcea, R., & Liu, H. (2006). A corpus-based approach to finding happiness. In N. Nicolov, F. Salvetti, M. Liberman, and J. H. Martin, (Eds.), AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs (AAAI-CAAW). AAAI Press, pp. 139-144. Muller, M., Kurth, F., Damm, D., Fremerey, C., & Clausen, M. (2007). Lyrics-based audio retrieval and multimodal navigation in music collections. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL’07), pp. 112-123. Neumayer, R., & Rauber, A. (2007). Integration of text and audio features for genre classification in music information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR'07), Apr. 2007, Rome, Italy, pp.724 – 727. Nicolov, N., Salvetti, F., Liberman, M., & Martin, J. H. (Eds.) (2006). AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs (AAAI-CAAW). AAAI Press. Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2): 1–135. Pohle, T., Pampalk, E., & Widmer, G. (2005). Evaluation of frequently used audio features for classification of music into perceptual categories. Technical Report, Österreichisches Forschungsinstitut für Artificial Intelligence, Wien, TR-2005-06. Rudman, J. (1998). The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31: 351–365. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 1161-1178. 122
Page 1 and 2:
IMPROVING MUSIC MOOD CLASSIFICATION
Page 3 and 4:
concatenation and late fusion (line
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would have never
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .
Page 9 and 10:
7.2.2 Best Hybrid Method ..........
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Mood categ
Page 13 and 14:
music itself and creating the socia
Page 15 and 16:
the ultimate judge. Thus ground tru
Page 17 and 18:
The advantages have attracted resea
Page 19 and 20:
Research Question 2: Which type(s)
Page 21 and 22:
There are two popular approaches in
Page 23 and 24:
1.4.1 Contributions to Methodology
Page 25 and 26:
experimental datasets in music mood
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 MO
Page 29 and 30:
hypothesizes that there are at leas
Page 31 and 32:
2.2.3 What We Know about Music Mood
Page 33 and 34:
encoding facial expressions, some o
Page 35 and 36:
environment by real-life users. The
Page 37 and 38:
1) Tempo: also called “rhythmic p
Page 39 and 40:
previous research did, Bischoff et
Page 41 and 42:
other. Stylistic features, borrowed
Page 43 and 44:
2.5 SUMMARY This chapter provided a
Page 45 and 46:
“evaluation” containing 492 wor
Page 47 and 48:
which it is derived. For instance,
Page 49 and 50:
3.3 COMPARISONS TO MUSIC PSYCHOLOGY
Page 51 and 52:
In total, 20 of the 36 derived cate
Page 53 and 54:
in today’s music listening enviro
Page 55 and 56:
3.4 SUMMARY The identified categori
Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 4: CLASSIFICATION EXPERIMEN
Page 59 and 60:
accuracy = TP + TN TP + FN + FP + T
Page 61 and 62:
Support Vector Machines (SVM), etc.
Page 63 and 64:
4.3 SUMMARY This chapter described
Page 65 and 66:
Table 5.1 Information of audio coll
Page 67 and 68:
irrelevant parts such as HTML marku
Page 69 and 70:
Starting from the dataset collected
Page 71 and 72:
Table 5.3 Mood categories and song
Page 73 and 74:
1) a song has been tagged with one
Page 75 and 76:
5.2.2.4 Negative Samples Figure 5.1
Page 77 and 78:
The patterns shown in this figure a
Page 79 and 80:
CHAPTER 6: BEST LYRIC FEATURES This
Page 81 and 82: Liu (2006) identified discriminativ
Page 83 and 84: as feature values respectively. The
Page 85 and 86: 6.2.2 Linguistic Lyric Features In
Page 87 and 88: mixed with regard to its usefulness
Page 89 and 90: Table 6.2 Text stylistic features e
Page 91 and 92: 6.3 IMPLEMENTATION The Snowball ste
Page 93 and 94: shows the best combined feature set
Page 95 and 96: 6.4.3 Analysis of Text Stylistic Fe
Page 97 and 98: Figure 6.1 Distributions of “!”
Page 99 and 100: stylistic features appeared to be a
Page 101 and 102: Support Vector Machines (SVM) as it
Page 103 and 104: then compared to the feature concat
Page 105 and 106: According to the average accuracies
Page 107 and 108: systems and the audio-only system w
Page 109 and 110: Table 7.4 Accuracies of lyric and a
Page 111 and 112: 7.4.2 Top-Ranked Features Based on
Page 113 and 114: Again, these top-ranked features se
Page 115 and 116: However, some might argue that word
Page 117 and 118: Figure 8.1 shows a general trend th
Page 119 and 120: There are other interesting observa
Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 9: CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE R
Page 123 and 124: different strengths. Lyric-based sy
Page 125 and 126: close relationship with music mood.
Page 127 and 128: available, it is interesting to exp
Page 129 and 130: Byrd, D., & Crawford, T. (2002). Pr
Page 131: Hu, X., Sanghvi, V., Vong, B., On,
Page 135 and 136: Thayer, R. E. (1989). The Biopsycho
Page 137 and 138: 18. “music fade” at end of a se
Page 139 and 140: 48. Segment annotation plus specifi
show all

improving music mood classification using lyrics, audio and social tags

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?