21.01.2014 Views

improving music mood classification using lyrics, audio and social tags

improving music mood classification using lyrics, audio and social tags

improving music mood classification using lyrics, audio and social tags

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

these terms may represent users’ preferences towards the songs rather than the <strong>mood</strong>s carried by<br />

the songs. Hence these terms were removed during the process of deriving <strong>mood</strong> categories from<br />

<strong>social</strong> <strong>tags</strong>; <strong>and</strong>, 3) five of the 28 adjectives in Russell’s model are not in WordNet-Affect:<br />

“aroused,” “tense,” “droopy,” “tired” <strong>and</strong> “sleepy.” They are either rarely used in daily life or are<br />

not deemed as <strong>mood</strong>-related. Nevertheless, the high percentage of matched vocabulary with<br />

WordNet-Affect (23 out of 28) does reflect the fact that Russell’s model is newer than Hevner’s.<br />

Figure 3.2 Words in Russell’s model that match <strong>tags</strong> in the derived categories<br />

It can also be seen from Figure 3.2 that matched words in the same category (circled<br />

together) are placed closely in Russell’s model, <strong>and</strong> the matched words distribute evenly across<br />

the four quadrants of the two dimensional space. This indicates the derived categories have a<br />

good coverage of <strong>mood</strong>s in Russell’s model. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, 2/3 of the 36 derived categories<br />

do not have matched or closely matched words in Russell’s model. This indicates that the<br />

original Russell model with 28 adjectives reflects some but not most of the <strong>mood</strong> categories used<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!