28.01.2014 Views

the bogle issue - IndexUniverse.com

the bogle issue - IndexUniverse.com

the bogle issue - IndexUniverse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

percent. It’s a trading fund, mostly for institutional trading.<br />

In a way, it’s failed to live up to its promise.<br />

I see nothing <strong>the</strong> matter with an investor who wants<br />

to buy and hold a broad market index fund. It’s a sound<br />

way to participate.<br />

But <strong>the</strong>re’s a lot of marketing. I think Jeremy Siegel [of<br />

WisdomTree] and Rob Arnott [of Research Affiliates] had<br />

what were perfectly reasonable ideas, and that is to give<br />

you an index fund that was slightly, only slightly, different<br />

from <strong>the</strong> regular index. The so-called fundamental value<br />

products don’t seem to be doing so well, now giving you<br />

roughly <strong>the</strong> same return over <strong>the</strong>ir history—it’s five years<br />

now—as <strong>the</strong> total stock market index, although <strong>the</strong> Arnott<br />

one has quite a bit higher volatility.<br />

The Jeremy Siegel idea of weighting by dividends I<br />

kind of thought was good because I could understand it.<br />

But you look at WisdomTree, and <strong>the</strong>ir dividend fund is<br />

$200 million of <strong>the</strong>ir total assets. Nobody wants it. They<br />

want rupees, and I don’t know, bahts, yen, renminbi, God<br />

knows what <strong>the</strong>y’re selling in <strong>the</strong> way of currency.<br />

The main problem with ETFs, it seems to me, is <strong>the</strong><br />

narrow subdivision of <strong>the</strong> markets, which makes it almost<br />

like picking stocks. If you look at <strong>the</strong> year-end Wall Street<br />

Journal, in tiny type, it’s a page-and-a-third of ETFs, 1,617<br />

of <strong>the</strong>m. It’s like stock-picking, and that seems ridiculous<br />

and offensive. Risk is concentrated in individual countries<br />

and individual industries and subindustries, and sub-subsubindustries.<br />

And it’s not enough to speculate whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> market will go up or down, now you’ve got to have three<br />

times leverage. And that’s going to hurt investors.<br />

The original paradigm for index funds is to buy <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market and hold it forever. That is only <strong>the</strong> paradigm<br />

for all of 1 percent of <strong>the</strong> ETF market—or be generous<br />

and call it 5-10 percent.<br />

The ETF is certainly <strong>the</strong> greatest marketing innovation<br />

so far in <strong>the</strong> 21st century. Whe<strong>the</strong>r it’s <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

investment innovation or best innovation for shareholders<br />

is totally in doubt.<br />

[One more thing]: What I don’t understand, and I will<br />

never understand, is why an ETF is an attractive vehicle for<br />

an actively managed fund. It’s bad enough to guess each<br />

minute whe<strong>the</strong>r an index is going up or down. But to guess<br />

each minute whe<strong>the</strong>r a manager is doing a little bit worse or<br />

a little bit better than <strong>the</strong> market strikes me as kind of crazy.<br />

Hougan: For <strong>the</strong> past couple of years, <strong>the</strong>re’s been a massive<br />

tilt toward passive indexes and away from active. Is <strong>the</strong>re<br />

an element of investors <strong>com</strong>ing to <strong>the</strong>ir senses? Do you think<br />

this pattern will continue? Or do you think this is a shortterm<br />

phenomenon and that active funds will be back?<br />

Bogle: It’s only <strong>the</strong> beginning for passive investing.<br />

Index funds are now around 25 percent of equity fund<br />

assets. They’re going to be bigger with all <strong>the</strong>se target<br />

retirement funds. They’re going to be bigger in <strong>the</strong> bond<br />

side. According to our data, in <strong>the</strong> last five years, $349<br />

billion has flowed into equity funds. That’s $564 billion<br />

into index funds and $214 billion out of active equity<br />

funds. That’s pretty dramatic.<br />

www.journalofindexes.<strong>com</strong><br />

And <strong>the</strong> numbers aren’t getting any better for <strong>the</strong><br />

active managers. I think people are waking up. How<br />

many Bill Millers do investors have to observe? How<br />

many Berkowitzes do investors have to observe?<br />

The average mutual fund manager lasts for about six<br />

years. And 50 percent of mutual funds <strong>the</strong>mselves go out<br />

of business every decade. How <strong>the</strong> heck do you invest for<br />

<strong>the</strong> long term if your fund doesn’t live for <strong>the</strong> long term?<br />

Some people say new managers do better, some people<br />

say <strong>the</strong>y do worse. All my instincts would say new managers<br />

do <strong>the</strong> same as old if you just spread it across an<br />

industry. But who knows, really?<br />

When we trade shares, we’re trading with each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

And who wins when we trade with each o<strong>the</strong>r? Not <strong>the</strong><br />

investors as a group. The croupiers of Wall Street win.<br />

There’s no way around that, is <strong>the</strong>re? Not that I know.<br />

Wiandt: What’s your view on <strong>the</strong> current state of <strong>the</strong> global<br />

markets? How should investors be looking at <strong>the</strong> market?<br />

Bogle: My rule is: Don’t peek. There’s so much noise in <strong>the</strong><br />

markets, so much volatility, and if you get captivated by<br />

that, you’re thinking like a speculator and not an investor.<br />

What you want to do is be prepared. You’re going to put<br />

away $500 a month for <strong>the</strong> rest of your life, or whatever<br />

it might be—maybe it increases with your earnings. And<br />

every five years expect a 20 percent drop in <strong>the</strong> market—<br />

sometimes even more. Just know it’s <strong>com</strong>ing. What happens<br />

is, we put money in before <strong>the</strong> crash—and <strong>the</strong> mutual<br />

fund record is crystal clear here—and take it out at <strong>the</strong><br />

bottom. We created hundreds of technology funds. When?<br />

When <strong>the</strong> technology boom was at its peak.<br />

We have to get marketing out and put management<br />

in. I call it <strong>the</strong> wisdom of long-term investing versus <strong>the</strong><br />

folly of short-term speculation. That’s in <strong>the</strong> math—that<br />

is not my opinion.<br />

Assume that every <strong>com</strong>pany on <strong>the</strong> S&P 500 has half<br />

of its shares held by long-term investors who don’t trade,<br />

and half of its shares held by short-term speculators<br />

who do. We know that those long-term investors as a<br />

group will capture <strong>the</strong> exact return of <strong>the</strong> S&P 500. And<br />

we know those speculative traders will capture <strong>the</strong> exact<br />

same return because <strong>the</strong>y own <strong>the</strong> same stocks. But by<br />

trading among one ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y will underperform <strong>the</strong><br />

market by <strong>the</strong> amount of <strong>the</strong>ir trading costs.<br />

So speculation is, by absolute ma<strong>the</strong>matical tautology,<br />

a loser’s game—losing to <strong>the</strong> market. And investment is,<br />

by absolute ma<strong>the</strong>matical tautology, a winner’s game—<br />

capturing <strong>the</strong> market return, almost 100 percent of it.<br />

Wiandt: What single ac<strong>com</strong>plishment are you proudest of?<br />

Bogle: It’s a little early to think about that, but <strong>the</strong> obvious<br />

thing is that everybody else claims to have created<br />

<strong>the</strong> index fund, but we actually did it. And we created<br />

a mutual <strong>com</strong>pany that is yet to be emulated. We gave<br />

substance to <strong>the</strong> no-load market. All <strong>the</strong>se steps—<br />

Vanguard, <strong>the</strong> index funds, <strong>the</strong> no-load decision, <strong>the</strong><br />

multi-tiered bond funds—I’ll put in one lump and say<br />

we created a better world for investors.<br />

March / April 2012 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!