28.01.2014 Views

High Speed Machining Precision Tooling - Indobiz.biz

High Speed Machining Precision Tooling - Indobiz.biz

High Speed Machining Precision Tooling - Indobiz.biz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Just how good is your<br />

process?<br />

Check your O.E.E. and find out<br />

There is no better statistical tool to<br />

use when evaluating the all-around<br />

effi ciency of a production process<br />

than Overall Equipment Effectiveness.<br />

O.E.E. is a simple series of formulas that<br />

be can used with any calculator and<br />

some basic data that are most likely<br />

currently at your disposal. There are 3<br />

factors within the production process<br />

that are evaluated using O.E.E.<br />

• Availability: The actual uptime of<br />

the process divided by the scheduled<br />

available runtime. Example: The<br />

scheduled runtime was 7.2 hours (432<br />

minutes). A broken parts feeder stopped<br />

production for 45 minutes. The uptime<br />

for the shift was 387 minutes. 387/432<br />

= 0.89583 or 89.6 percent.<br />

Bottom line– Availability represents<br />

machine breakdowns.<br />

• Performance efficiency (P.E.): During<br />

the actual uptime, how effi cient was the<br />

process when compared the designed<br />

optimum cycle time. Example: The<br />

optimum cycle time for the process<br />

is 15 seconds per part or 4 parts per<br />

minute. For 387 minutes of uptime, the<br />

process would produce 1548 parts if it<br />

never stopped once. During our shift,<br />

we produced 1357 parts. 1357/1548 =<br />

0.87661 or 87.7 percent.<br />

Bottom line- Performance effi ciency<br />

represents short stoppages of the<br />

process.<br />

• Rate of quality product (R.O.Q.P):<br />

Of the total number of parts produced<br />

during the uptime, what percentage was<br />

conforming. Example: During our 387<br />

minutes in which we produced 1357<br />

parts, 14 were defective and 12 need<br />

re-worked. 1331 conforming parts were<br />

made. 1331/1357 = 0.9808 or 98.1<br />

percent.<br />

Bottom line- Lower your in-process<br />

scrap and rework.<br />

The Overall Equipment Effectiveness is<br />

computed by the formula – Availability x<br />

P.E. x R.O.Q.P.<br />

0.896 x 0.877 x 0.981 equals 77.1<br />

percent, which is our O.E.E. for this<br />

process.<br />

A “World Class” process would produce<br />

a consistent 85 percent O.E.E. (or<br />

an average of 95 percent in each<br />

category).<br />

There are some simple items to look at<br />

for an O.E.E. improvement. Availability<br />

deals with scheduled uptime. Be<br />

sure routine items such as machine<br />

changeovers, preventive maintenance,<br />

and department meetings are scheduled<br />

through the production controller<br />

(however titled) at your facility.<br />

Improving P.E. means correcting a short<br />

stoppage before the cycle time is lost.<br />

Never lose sight of the parts counter at<br />

the end of the process. Some processes<br />

are made up of smaller stations with<br />

their own unique cycle times. The<br />

stations form a chain and the optimum<br />

cycle time of the process will be the<br />

cycle time of the slowest station. This is<br />

benefi cial because it can be determined<br />

which stations are capable of “catching<br />

up” after a stoppage. If more than one<br />

stoppage occurs at the same time, it may<br />

be best to correct them from the closest<br />

to the end of the process and then work<br />

backwards towards the beginning.<br />

This goes against conventional thinking.<br />

If a stoppage occurs down toward the<br />

end of the process and at the same time<br />

a machine jams up right in front of you<br />

(while you’re at the front of the process),<br />

it may be better to walk down to clear<br />

the other stoppage fi rst. The reason<br />

behind this is if the stoppage down the<br />

line is not fi xed fi rst, it is possible the<br />

last process will run out of parts. Each<br />

and every 15 seconds is lost forever. By<br />

fi xing the stoppages toward the end of<br />

the line fi rst, you have a better chance<br />

of parts “catching up” and there will be<br />

no cycle time lost at the last process.<br />

In some situations any stoppage will<br />

shut the entire process down. In that<br />

case I would suggest placing re-settable<br />

trip counters at various intervals. When<br />

a stoppage occurs, the operator can trip<br />

the counter. After a week of production,<br />

the counters will tell you where the most<br />

stoppages are occurring and further<br />

evaluation can be planned.<br />

R.O.Q.P. is too product-specifi c to be<br />

discussed in the article. If your facility<br />

doesn’t have an organized quality<br />

system, I suggest developing one.<br />

Remember that no system will be any<br />

better than the operators who use<br />

it. Machines make parts, but people<br />

make products. Keep an open mind and<br />

always, always, always be creative.<br />

indometalworking news Vol. 2 / 2008 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!