02.02.2014 Views

SPEX User's Manual - SRON

SPEX User's Manual - SRON

SPEX User's Manual - SRON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 Response matrices<br />

Table 5.1: Weights w mn = 1/2+Si[(π(m−n)]/π used in the cumulative Shannon approximation.<br />

m − n w mn m − n w mn<br />

-9 -0.0112 9 1.0112<br />

-8 0.0126 8 0.9874<br />

-7 -0.0144 7 1.0144<br />

-6 0.0168 6 0.9832<br />

-5 -0.0201 5 1.0201<br />

-4 0.0250 4 0.9750<br />

-3 -0.0331 3 1.0331<br />

-2 0.0486 2 0.9514<br />

-1 -0.0895 1 1.0895<br />

For the comparison of the aliased model to the true model we consider two statistical tests, the classical<br />

χ 2 test and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. This is elaborated in the next sections.<br />

5.3.4 The χ 2 test<br />

Suppose that f 0 (x) is the unknown, true probability density function (pdf) describing the observed<br />

spectrum. Further let f 1 (x) be an approximation to f 0 using e.g. the Shannon reconstruction as discussed<br />

in the previous sections, with a bin size ∆. The probability p 0n of observing an event in the data bin<br />

number n under the hypothesis H 0 that the pdf is f 0 is given by<br />

p 0n =<br />

∫n∆<br />

(n−1)∆<br />

f 0 (x)dx (5.6)<br />

and similar the probability p 1n of observing an event in the data bin number n under the hypothesis H 1<br />

that the pdf is f 1 is<br />

p 1n =<br />

∫n∆<br />

(n−1)∆<br />

f 1 (x)dx. (5.7)<br />

We define the relative difference δ n between both probabilities as<br />

p 1n ≡ p 0n (1 + δ n ). (5.8)<br />

Let the total number of events in the spectrum be given by N. Then the random variable X n , defined as<br />

the number of observed events in bin n, has a Poisson distribution with an expected value µ n = Np 0n .<br />

The classical χ 2 test for testing the hypothesis H 0 against H 1 is now based on the random variable:<br />

X 2 ≡<br />

k∑ (X n − Np 0n ) 2<br />

n=1<br />

Np 0n<br />

. (5.9)<br />

The hypothesis H 0 will be rejected if X 2 becomes too large. In (5.9) k is the total number of data bins.<br />

X 2 has a (central) χ 2 distribution with k degrees of freedom, if the hypothesis H 0 is true, and in the<br />

limit of large N.<br />

However if H 1 holds, X 2 no longer has a central χ 2 distribution. It is straightforward to show that if<br />

f 1 approaches f 0 , then under the hypothesis H 1 X 2 has a non-central χ 2 distribution with non-central<br />

parameter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!