28.02.2014 Views

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.5 discussion 97<br />

1.0<br />

●<br />

Bray−Curtis similarity <strong>of</strong> visited plants<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

● ● ●●<br />

●<br />

● ● ● ● ●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●●<br />

●●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

● ●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />

Mean Bray−Curtis similarity <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om plant samples<br />

Figure 5.4: Similarity <strong>of</strong> flower selection across sites. The Bray-Curtis similarity<br />

<strong>of</strong> plant species visited by an insect species at two altitudes<br />

is plotted against the mean similarity <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om samples<br />

<strong>of</strong> all flowering plants available to the insect at the two sites. The<br />

dashed diagonal line marks the expected similarity <strong>of</strong> visited<br />

plant species under the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om selection <strong>of</strong><br />

flowers. Filled circles indicate significantly higher similarity <strong>of</strong><br />

visited plants than expected by chance, as determined in r<strong>and</strong>omization<br />

tests. Open circles indicate nonsignificant tests. The<br />

solid line is the prediction <strong>of</strong> a linear regression: sqrt(y) = 1.167<br />

x + 0.336, p < 0.001, F 1,105 = 51.28, R²= 0.32.<br />

5.5 discussion<br />

In order to be able to predict the effects <strong>of</strong> climate change on<br />

plant-pollinator interactions via shifts in phenology, it is important<br />

to underst<strong>and</strong> to what extent pollinator species depend<br />

on phenological synchrony with specific plant species as floral<br />

resources. The current study sheds light on this question<br />

by considering the relationship between pollinator specialisation<br />

<strong>and</strong> phenological synchrony with flowering plants along<br />

an altitudinal gradient. Contrary to our expectation, we found<br />

that specialised pollinators did not show a closer phenological<br />

match with the plant species they visited than generalised pollinators.<br />

Moreover, the similarity <strong>of</strong> plant species visited by the<br />

same pollinator species at different altitudes (“visitation consistency”)<br />

was highly variable within species <strong>and</strong> showed no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!