28.02.2014 Views

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.6 appendix 35<br />

Here, S <strong>and</strong> T denote the maximum number <strong>of</strong> seeds or pollinator<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspring, respectively, that a single individual can produce<br />

within one time step. h P <strong>and</strong> h A are half-saturation constants.<br />

All other parameters are as defined in the main text.<br />

Community <strong>Stability</strong><br />

0.001<br />

0.000<br />

−0.001<br />

−0.002<br />

γ ik = 0.99<br />

B=1, Holl I<br />

B=16, Holl I<br />

B=1, Holl II<br />

B=16, Holl II<br />

Community <strong>Stability</strong><br />

1e−03<br />

5e−04<br />

0e+00<br />

γ ik = 0.5<br />

−0.003<br />

−5e−04<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />

Pollinator Specialization<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />

Pollinator Specialization<br />

Figure 2.5: Effect <strong>of</strong> a Holling type II functional response on community stability.<br />

In both graphs, community stability <strong>of</strong> a system with two<br />

plant <strong>and</strong> two pollinator species is plotted against the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

specialisation <strong>of</strong> plant-pollinator interactions for Holling type I<br />

(black lines) <strong>and</strong> Holling type II functional responses (grey lines)<br />

<strong>of</strong> both plant <strong>and</strong> animal birth rates. Results are shown for two<br />

degrees <strong>of</strong> plant niche overlap (γ ik , left <strong>and</strong> right panel) <strong>and</strong><br />

two different values <strong>of</strong> pollen carryover (B). Community stability<br />

was measured as C = 1 − |ˆλ|, where ˆλ is the largest eigenvalue<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Jacobian matrix at the coexistence equilibrium. The following<br />

parameter values were used for this figure: S = 1 · 10 −5 <strong>and</strong><br />

h P = 2.6666 or β P = 3.75 · 10 −6 , respectively, T = 1 · 10 −5 <strong>and</strong><br />

h A = 15.5797 or β A = 6.33 · 10 −7 , respectively, d P = 3 · 10 −8 ,<br />

d A = 3 · 10 −7 , b veg = 3.5 · 10 −8 , H P = 10000, N = 1.1.<br />

The introduction <strong>of</strong> a saturating functional response for plant<br />

<strong>and</strong> pollinator reproduction did not induce a fundamental<br />

change in the relationship between pollinator specialisation <strong>and</strong><br />

community stability (Fig. 2.5). However, a decrease in plant<br />

niche overlap from γ ik = 0.99 to γ ik = 0.5 had a stronger effect<br />

on a system with Holling type I functional responses. Otherwise,<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> pollinator specialisation <strong>and</strong> pollen carryover<br />

were identical.<br />

2.6.2 Relationship between specialisation <strong>and</strong> community stability without<br />

a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between generalist <strong>and</strong> specialist feeding behaviour<br />

The measure <strong>of</strong> specialisation <strong>of</strong> plant-pollinator networks S<br />

used in the main article implies that a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between specialist<br />

<strong>and</strong> generalist interactions exists. In order to investigate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!