Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

134 references Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. (2007). Plant-animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 38, 567–593. (Cited on pages 13 and 20.) Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melian, C.J. & Olesen, J.M. (2003). The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 9383– 9387. (Cited on pages 13 and 42.) Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J.M. (2006). Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science, 312, 431–433. (Cited on pages 20 and 41.) Bastolla, U., Fortuna, M.A., Pascual-Garcia, A., Ferrera, A., Luque, B. & Bascompte, J. (2009). The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature, 458, 1018–1020. (Cited on pages 15, 16, 20, 31, 40, 41, 42, 43, 52, 53, 54, 81, 107, 122, 123, and 129.) Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixedeffects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. (Cited on page 91.) Bell, G. (2001). Neutral macroecology. Science, 293, 2413–2418. (Cited on page 32.) Benadi, G., Blüthgen, N., Hovestadt, T. & Poethke, H.J. (2012a). Contrasting specialization-stability relationships in plant-animal mutualistic systems. Ecological Modelling, submitted. (Cited on pages 41 and 43.) Benadi, G., Blüthgen, N., Hovestadt, T. & Poethke, H.J. (2012b). Population dynamics of plant and pollinator communities: stability reconsidered. American Naturalist, 179, 157–168. (Cited on pages 41, 42, 43, 52, 54, 64, 65, 67, 70, 73, 78, and 81.) Bever, J.D. (2002). Negative feedback within a mutualism: hostspecific growth of mycorrhizal fungi reduces plant benefit. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 269, 2595–2601. (Cited on page 65.) Bever, J.D., Richardson, S.C., Lawrence, B.M., Holmes, J. & Watson, M. (2009). Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecology Letters, 12, 13–21. (Cited on page 9.) Biesmeijer, J.C., Roberts, S.P.M., Reemer, M., Ohlemuller, R., Edwards, M., Peeters, T., Schaffers, A.P., Potts, S.G., Kleukers,
eferences 135 R., Thomas, C.D., Settele, J. & Kunin, W.E. (2006). Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in britain and the netherlands. Science, 313, 351–354. (Cited on pages 10, 64, and 118.) Blüthgen, N. (2010). Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: a critique and an ecologist’s guide. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 185–195. (Cited on pages 42 and 85.) Blüthgen, N., Fründ, J., Vázquez, D.P. & Menzel, F. (2008). What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits. Ecology, 89, 3387–3399. (Cited on pages 13 and 88.) Blüthgen, N. & Klein, A. (2011). Functional complementarity and specialisation: The role of biodiversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12, 282–291. (Cited on pages 10 and 64.) Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Blüthgen, N. (2006). Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6, 9. (Cited on pages 7, 14, 88, 89, and 99.) Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F., Hovestadt, T., Fiala, B. & Blüthgen, N. (2007). Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Current Biology, 17, 341–346. (Cited on pages 20 and 84.) Bolker, B.M., Pacala, S.W. & Neuhauser, C. (2003). Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: What do we really know? American Naturalist, 162, 135–148. (Cited on page 110.) Bolmgren, K., Eriksson, O. & Linder, H. (2003). Contrasting flowering phenology and species richness in abiotically and biotically pollinated angiosperms. Evolution, 57, 2001–2011. (Cited on page 112.) Bond, W.J. (1994). Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 344, 83–90. (Cited on pages 2 and 85.) Both, C., Bouwhuis, S., Lessells, C. & Visser, M. (2006). Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature, 441, 81–83. (Cited on page 84.) Boucher, D.H., James, S. & Keeler, K.H. (1982). The ecology of mutualism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 315–347. (Cited on page 65.)
Page 1:
L I N K I N G S P E C I A L I S AT
Page 5:
E R K L Ä R U N G gemäß § 4 Abs
Page 9 and 10:
D A N K S A G U N G Zuallererst mö
Page 14 and 15:
xiv contents 3.3 The Model 43 3.3.1
Page 17 and 18:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N “Es ist
Page 19 and 20:
1.3 ecological stability 3 vegetabl
Page 21 and 22:
1.3 ecological stability 5 tions an
Page 23 and 24:
1.4 specialisation 7 tween the fund
Page 25 and 26:
1.4 specialisation 9 may be promote
Page 27 and 28:
1.4 specialisation 11 ogy through h
Page 29 and 30:
1.4 specialisation 13 tionships bet
Page 31 and 32:
1.5 outline of this thesis 15 1.5.1
Page 33:
1.5 outline of this thesis 17 2007)
Page 36 and 37:
20 plant-pollinator dynamics: stabi
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 55 and 56:
3 C A N P L A N T- P O L L I N AT O
Page 57 and 58:
3.2 introduction 41 the maximum num
Page 59 and 60:
3.3 the model 43 certain types of r
Page 61 and 62:
3.3 the model 45 time unit, summed
Page 63 and 64:
3.3 the model 47 Figure 3.1: Illust
Page 65 and 66:
3.4 results 49 difference in evenne
Page 67 and 68:
3.5 discussion 51 abundance 150 100
Page 69 and 70:
3.5 discussion 53 seed numbers betw
Page 71 and 72:
3.6 appendix 55 Despite the existen
Page 73 and 74:
3.6 appendix 57 mean number of visi
Page 75 and 76:
3.6 appendix 59 Table 3.2: Plant di
Page 77:
3.6 appendix 61 proportional differ
Page 80 and 81:
64 contrasting specialisation-stabi
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101: 84 the importance of being synchron
Page 116 and 117: 100 the importance of being synchro
Page 123 and 124: S Y N T H E S I S 6 The previous fo
Page 125 and 126: 6.1 mechanisms of diversity mainten
Page 131 and 132: 6.2 consequences of climate change
Page 137 and 138: S U M M A RY For most angiosperm pl
Page 139 and 140: summary 123 veloped in chapter 2. O
Page 141: summary 125 and intensity of extrem
Page 144 and 145: 128 zusammenfassung ten der Erhaltu
Page 146 and 147: 130 zusammenfassung wir den Zusamme
Page 149: R E F E R E N C E S Abrams, P.A. (2
Page 153 and 154: eferences 137 Clavel, J., Julliard,
Page 155 and 156: eferences 139 role of trade-off str
Page 157 and 158: eferences 141 Gomez, J.M., Abdelazi
Page 159 and 160: eferences 143 Ives, A.R. & Carpente
Page 161 and 162: eferences 145 Leibold, M. & McPeek,
Page 163 and 164: eferences 147 Moonen, A. & Barberi,
Page 165 and 166: eferences 149 Pielou, E.C. (1975).
Page 167 and 168: eferences 151 Schemske, D.W., Mitte
Page 169 and 170: eferences 153 Visser, M.E. & Hollem
Page 171: L I S T O F P U B L I C AT I O N S
Page 175: colophon This document was typeset
show all

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?