Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

144 references Kiester, A.R., Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. (1984). Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. The American Naturalist, 124, pp. 220–243. (Cited on page 1.) Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C. & Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 303–313. (Cited on pages 2 and 3.) Koh, L.P., Dunn, R.R., Sodhi, N.S., Colwell, R.K., Proctor, H.C. & Smith, V.S. (2004). Species coextinctions and the biodiversity crisis. Science, 305, 1632–1634. (Cited on page 10.) Kudo, G., Nishikawa, Y., Kasagi, T. & Kosuge, S. (2004). Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early? Ecological Research, 19, 255–259. (Cited on page 116.) Kunin, W. (1993). Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology, 74, 2145–2160. (Cited on page 113.) Kunin, W. & Iwasa, Y. (1996). Pollinator foraging strategies in mixed floral arrays: density effects and floral constancy. Theoretical Population Biology, 49, 232–263. (Cited on pages 15, 20, 29, 34, 65, and 108.) Laverty, T. & Plowright, R. (1985). Competition between hummingbirds and bumble bees for nectar in flowers of Impatiens biflora. Oecologia, 66, 25–32. (Cited on page 41.) Laverty, T. & Plowright, R. (1988). Flower handling by bumblebees: a comparison of specialists and generalists. Animal Behaviour, 36, 733–740. (Cited on page 43.) Lawton, J.H. (1995). Population dynamic principles. In: Extinction rates (eds. Lawton, J.H. & May, R.M.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 147–163. (Cited on page 41.) Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology. Elsevier Science & Technology, Amsterdam. (Cited on page 90.) Leibold, M., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J., Hoopes, M., Holt, R., Shurin, J., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau, M. & González, A. (2004). The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7, 601–613. (Cited on page 111.)
eferences 145 Leibold, M. & McPeek, M. (2006). Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology, 87, 1399– 1410. (Cited on pages 4 and 32.) Levin, D.A. & Anderson, W.W. (1970). Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. American Naturalist, 104, 455–467. (Cited on pages 15, 20, 29, 34, 65, 107, 108, 110, 122, 128, and 129.) Levine, J.M. & HilleRisLambers, J. (2009). The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature, 461, 254–257. (Cited on pages 4, 32, and 112.) Lunau, K. & Maier, E.J. (1995). Innate colour preferences of flower visitors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 177, 1–19. (Cited on page 103.) MacArthur, R.H. (1972). Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Rowe, New York. (Cited on page 8.) Manly, B. (2007). Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London. (Cited on page 91.) Maxima.sourceforge.net (2010). Maxima, a Computer Algebra System, 5th edn. (Cited on pages 25 and 70.) May, R. (1972). Will a large complex system be stable? Nature, 238, 413–414. (Cited on page 25.) May, R.M. (1973). Qualitative stability in model ecosystems. Ecology, 54, 638–641. (Cited on pages 15 and 65.) May, R.M. (1974). Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. 2nd edn. Monographs in population biology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. (Cited on pages 25 and 70.) May, R.M. (1982). Mutualistic interactions among species. Nature, 296, 803–804. (Cited on page 15.) McCann, K.S. (2000). The diversity–stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233. (Cited on page 63.) McCauley, E. & Briand, F. (1979). Zooplankton grazing and phytoplankton species richness: field tests of the predation hypothesis. Limnology and Oceanography, 24, 243–252. (Cited on page 40.)
Page 1:
L I N K I N G S P E C I A L I S AT
Page 5:
E R K L Ä R U N G gemäß § 4 Abs
Page 9 and 10:
D A N K S A G U N G Zuallererst mö
Page 14 and 15:
xiv contents 3.3 The Model 43 3.3.1
Page 17 and 18:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N “Es ist
Page 19 and 20:
1.3 ecological stability 3 vegetabl
Page 21 and 22:
1.3 ecological stability 5 tions an
Page 23 and 24:
1.4 specialisation 7 tween the fund
Page 25 and 26:
1.4 specialisation 9 may be promote
Page 27 and 28:
1.4 specialisation 11 ogy through h
Page 29 and 30:
1.4 specialisation 13 tionships bet
Page 31 and 32:
1.5 outline of this thesis 15 1.5.1
Page 33:
1.5 outline of this thesis 17 2007)
Page 36 and 37:
20 plant-pollinator dynamics: stabi
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 55 and 56:
3 C A N P L A N T- P O L L I N AT O
Page 57 and 58:
3.2 introduction 41 the maximum num
Page 59 and 60:
3.3 the model 43 certain types of r
Page 61 and 62:
3.3 the model 45 time unit, summed
Page 63 and 64:
3.3 the model 47 Figure 3.1: Illust
Page 65 and 66:
3.4 results 49 difference in evenne
Page 67 and 68:
3.5 discussion 51 abundance 150 100
Page 69 and 70:
3.5 discussion 53 seed numbers betw
Page 71 and 72:
3.6 appendix 55 Despite the existen
Page 73 and 74:
3.6 appendix 57 mean number of visi
Page 75 and 76:
3.6 appendix 59 Table 3.2: Plant di
Page 77:
3.6 appendix 61 proportional differ
Page 80 and 81:
64 contrasting specialisation-stabi
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
84 the importance of being synchron
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111: 94 the importance of being synchron
Page 116 and 117: 100 the importance of being synchro
Page 123 and 124: S Y N T H E S I S 6 The previous fo
Page 125 and 126: 6.1 mechanisms of diversity mainten
Page 131 and 132: 6.2 consequences of climate change
Page 137 and 138: S U M M A RY For most angiosperm pl
Page 139 and 140: summary 123 veloped in chapter 2. O
Page 141: summary 125 and intensity of extrem
Page 144 and 145: 128 zusammenfassung ten der Erhaltu
Page 146 and 147: 130 zusammenfassung wir den Zusamme
Page 149 and 150: R E F E R E N C E S Abrams, P.A. (2
Page 151 and 152: eferences 135 R., Thomas, C.D., Set
Page 153 and 154: eferences 137 Clavel, J., Julliard,
Page 155 and 156: eferences 139 role of trade-off str
Page 157 and 158: eferences 141 Gomez, J.M., Abdelazi
Page 159: eferences 143 Ives, A.R. & Carpente
Page 163 and 164: eferences 147 Moonen, A. & Barberi,
Page 165 and 166: eferences 149 Pielou, E.C. (1975).
Page 167 and 168: eferences 151 Schemske, D.W., Mitte
Page 169 and 170: eferences 153 Visser, M.E. & Hollem
Page 171: L I S T O F P U B L I C AT I O N S
Page 175: colophon This document was typeset
show all

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?