Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

146 references McKay, M., Beckman, R. & Conover, W. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 239–245. (Cited on page 72.) McKinney, M. (1997). Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 495–516. (Cited on page 9.) McLaughlin, J.F., Hellmann, J.J., Boggs, C.L. & Ehrlich, P.R. (2002). Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 6070–6074. (Cited on page 115.) Memmott, J. (1999). The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. Ecology Letters, 2, 276–280. (Cited on page 13.) Memmott, J., Craze, P.G., Waser, N.M. & Price, M.V. (2007). Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology Letters, 10, 710–717. (Cited on pages 17, 84, 85, 103, and 116.) Miller-Rushing, A., Høye, T., Inouye, D. & Post, E. (2010). The effects of phenological mismatches on demography. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3177. (Cited on pages 84, 114, and 117.) Mitchell, R., Irwin, R., Flanagan, R. & Karron, J. (2009a). Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. Annals of Botany, 103, 1355–1363. (Cited on pages 12 and 14.) Mitchell, R.J., Flanagan, R.J., Brown, B.J., Waser, N.M. & Karron, J.D. (2009b). New frontiers in competition for pollination. Annals of Botany, 103, 1403–1413. (Cited on page 41.) Mitra, D., Mukherjee, D., Roy, A. & Ray, S. (1992). Permanent coexistence in a resource-based competition system. Ecological Modelling, 60, 77–85. (Cited on page 78.) Moeller, D.A. (2004). Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology, 85, 3289–3301. (Cited on page 112.) Molina-Montenegro, M., Badano, E. & Cavieres, L. (2008). Positive interactions among plant species for pollinator service: assessing the ’magnet species’ concept with invasive species. Oikos, 117, 1833–1839. (Cited on page 112.) Montgomery, B.R. (2009). Do pollen carryover and pollinator constancy mitigate effects of competition for pollination? Oikos, 118, 1084–1092. (Cited on pages 108 and 109.)
eferences 147 Moonen, A. & Barberi, P. (2008). Functional biodiversity: An agroecosystem approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 127, 7–21. (Cited on page 67.) Morales, C. & Traveset, A. (2008). Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27, 221–238. (Cited on page 68.) Moran, N.A. (1988). The evolution of host-plant alternation in aphids: evidence for specialization as a dead end. American Naturalist, 132, 681–706. (Cited on page 9.) Moussus, J., Julliard, R. & Jiguet, F. (2010). Featuring 10 phenological estimators using simulated data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 140–150. (Cited on pages 88 and 102.) Muchhala, N., Brown, Z., Armbruster, W.S. & Potts, M.D. (2010). Competition drives specialization in pollination systems through costs to male fitness. American Naturalist, 176, 732–743. (Cited on page 20.) Müller, A., Diener, S., Schnyder, S., Stutz, K., Sedivy, C. & Dorn, S. (2006). Quantitative pollen requirements of solitary bees: implications for bee conservation and the evolution of beeflower relationships. Biological Conservation, 130, 604 – 615. (Cited on page 33.) Naeem, S. (1998). Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology, 12, 39–45. (Cited on page 10.) Neubert, M. & Caswell, H. (1997). Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology, 78, 653–665. (Cited on page 80.) Nilsson, C. & Grelsson, G. (1995). The fragility of ecosystems: A review. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 677–692. (Cited on pages 5 and 82.) Okuyama, T. & Holland, J.N. (2008). Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. Ecology Letters, 11, 208–216. (Cited on pages 20, 25, 41, 42, 47, 70, and 81.) Olesen, J.M., Bascompte, J., Elberling, H. & Jordano, P. (2008). Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. Ecology, 89, 1573–82. (Cited on page 14.) Olff, H. & Ritchie, M. (1998). Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 261–265. (Cited on page 40.)
Page 1:
L I N K I N G S P E C I A L I S AT
Page 5:
E R K L Ä R U N G gemäß § 4 Abs
Page 9 and 10:
D A N K S A G U N G Zuallererst mö
Page 14 and 15:
xiv contents 3.3 The Model 43 3.3.1
Page 17 and 18:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N “Es ist
Page 19 and 20:
1.3 ecological stability 3 vegetabl
Page 21 and 22:
1.3 ecological stability 5 tions an
Page 23 and 24:
1.4 specialisation 7 tween the fund
Page 25 and 26:
1.4 specialisation 9 may be promote
Page 27 and 28:
1.4 specialisation 11 ogy through h
Page 29 and 30:
1.4 specialisation 13 tionships bet
Page 31 and 32:
1.5 outline of this thesis 15 1.5.1
Page 33:
1.5 outline of this thesis 17 2007)
Page 36 and 37:
20 plant-pollinator dynamics: stabi
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 55 and 56:
3 C A N P L A N T- P O L L I N AT O
Page 57 and 58:
3.2 introduction 41 the maximum num
Page 59 and 60:
3.3 the model 43 certain types of r
Page 61 and 62:
3.3 the model 45 time unit, summed
Page 63 and 64:
3.3 the model 47 Figure 3.1: Illust
Page 65 and 66:
3.4 results 49 difference in evenne
Page 67 and 68:
3.5 discussion 51 abundance 150 100
Page 69 and 70:
3.5 discussion 53 seed numbers betw
Page 71 and 72:
3.6 appendix 55 Despite the existen
Page 73 and 74:
3.6 appendix 57 mean number of visi
Page 75 and 76:
3.6 appendix 59 Table 3.2: Plant di
Page 77:
3.6 appendix 61 proportional differ
Page 80 and 81:
64 contrasting specialisation-stabi
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
84 the importance of being synchron
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113: 96 the importance of being synchron
Page 114 and 115: 98 the importance of being synchron
Page 116 and 117: 100 the importance of being synchro
Page 123 and 124: S Y N T H E S I S 6 The previous fo
Page 125 and 126: 6.1 mechanisms of diversity mainten
Page 131 and 132: 6.2 consequences of climate change
Page 137 and 138: S U M M A RY For most angiosperm pl
Page 139 and 140: summary 123 veloped in chapter 2. O
Page 141: summary 125 and intensity of extrem
Page 144 and 145: 128 zusammenfassung ten der Erhaltu
Page 146 and 147: 130 zusammenfassung wir den Zusamme
Page 149 and 150: R E F E R E N C E S Abrams, P.A. (2
Page 151 and 152: eferences 135 R., Thomas, C.D., Set
Page 153 and 154: eferences 137 Clavel, J., Julliard,
Page 155 and 156: eferences 139 role of trade-off str
Page 157 and 158: eferences 141 Gomez, J.M., Abdelazi
Page 159 and 160: eferences 143 Ives, A.R. & Carpente
Page 161: eferences 145 Leibold, M. & McPeek,
Page 165 and 166: eferences 149 Pielou, E.C. (1975).
Page 167 and 168: eferences 151 Schemske, D.W., Mitte
Page 169 and 170: eferences 153 Visser, M.E. & Hollem
Page 171: L I S T O F P U B L I C AT I O N S
Page 175: colophon This document was typeset
show all

Linking Specialisation and Stability of Plant ... - OPUS Würzburg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?