National Resources Sector Employment Taskforce Technical Paper

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 1: Advanced projects by location Kitan oil Montara/Skua oil Darwin Karara hematite and magnetite iron ore Extension Hill DSO iron ore Dampier–Bunbury 5B gas pipeline Kwinana Processing Plant TiO 2 pigment titanium minerals Worsley Refinery Efficiency & Growth Project alumina LEGEND NWS North Rankin B LNG NWS CWLH oil Pluto LNG Gorgon LNG Sino Iron Project iron ore Capital expenditure $0–100m $101–500m $501–1000m >$1000m Processing facility Mine/ platform Reindeer gas field, Devil Creek gas processing plant Utah Point Berth iron ore infrastructure Charters Towers gold Argyle diamonds Ernest Henry underground copper Abbot Point coal infrastructure Western Australian Iron Ore infrastructure Goonyella to Abbot Point X50 coal infrastructure Nullagine iron ore Coppabella to Ingsdon Boyne Island smelter aluminium Rapid Growth 5 iron ore rail duplication coal infrastructure Chichester hub 55 iron ore Moranbah Ammonium Nitrate Integrated Isaac Plains Project coal Middlemount (stage 1) coal Nicholas Downs manganese Clermont coal Yarwun refinery stage 2 alumina Brockman 4 Kestrel coal Rocklands to Kabra rail duplication coal infrastructure Project iron ore Talc redesign South West Queensland Curragh coal Blackwater System nickel Pipeline (stages 2 and 3) Power Upgrade coal infrastructure Moomba to Sydney gas pipeline Queensland gas pipeline Duketon gold Edna May gold gas pipeline Talinga stage 2 coal seam gas St Ives (Athena underground) gold Brisbane Cameby Down coal Boggabri opencut coal Mt Weld rare earths Brisbane coal terminal expansion Mount Arthur coal Darling Range Super Pit gold Eucla Basin Narrabri (stage 1) coal North DSO mineral sands Honeymoon Moolarben stage 1 coal Minimbah Bank Third Rail Line (stage 1) bauxite Aldiss/Randalls uranium Northparkes coal infrastructure Perth (phase 1) gold Snapper E48 copper Blakefield South coal mineral Mangoola coal Adelaide sands Sydney Kooragang island coal terminal Cadia East gold Canberra expansions Newcastle export terminal coal infrastructure Mount Cattlin lithium Melbourne Metropolitan longwall coal Eastern gas pipeline BassGas Turrum gas (Yolla Mid Life Enhancement) Kipper (stage 1) gas natural gas proposed gas pipeline capital city Micro LNG plant Hobart Source: Lampard 2010 As Table 1 shows, Western Australia’s 29 advanced projects account for $86 billion worth of investment (79 per cent). Projects include Gorgon LNG, Pluto LNG, BHP Billiton’s Rapid Growth Project 5, North West Shelf North Rankin B, Sino Iron Project, and Worsley Efficiency and Growth Project. The projects range in value from $2 billion to $43 billion. Table 1: Advanced projects, number, cost ($ million), sector and state and territory, April 2010 Energy projects No. Cost ($m) No. Mining Cost ($m) Minerals processing No. Cost ($m) No. Total Cost ($m) Western Australia 6 64,111 21 19,688 2 2,620 29 86,419 Queensland* 16 6,807 3 1,646 3 2,860 22 11,313 New South Wales* 13 5,158 3 2,232 0 0 16 7,390 Northern Territory 2 795 0 0 0 0 2 795 South Australia 1 138 1 390 0 0 2 528 Victoria 2 2,670 0 0 0 0 2 2,670 Tasmania 1 345 0 0 1 150 2 495 Australia 41 80,024 28 23,956 6 5,630 75 109,610 Source: Taskforce analysis of Lampard 2010 * Some projects cross state borders 4 | National Resources Sector Employment Taskforce: Technical Paper
ABARE’s list also identifies 286 less advanced projects with a value of $249.9 billion. Projects in this category are either undergoing a feasibility study or have not yet been subject to a Final Investment Decision. Figure 2 shows less advanced projects are spread more broadly across Australia, although 64 per cent are split between Western Australia and Queensland. Figure 2: Less advanced projects–state share Australia, April 2010 100 90 80 90 91 Number of projects 70 60 50 40 30 20 51 20 22 10 0 8 4 Western Australia Queensland * New South Wales* Northern Territory South Australia Victoria Tasmania States and territories * some projects cross state borders Source: Taskforce analysis of ABARE unpublished data 2.2 Project timing The ABARE list contains an expected operations commencement date but not a construction commencement date. For the purpose of this section the Taskforce relied on additional sources (including companies, state governments and submissions) and made some assumptions about the length of time required for particular activities. The Taskforce has assumed the construction of a LNG train takes three years and construction of mining operations takes 18 months. Figure 3 shows when the advanced and less advanced projects identified by ABARE are likely to commence construction and the expected construction duration. Production is assumed to commence immediately upon completion of construction. National Resources Sector Employment Taskforce: Technical Paper | 5
Page 1 and 2: RESOURCING THE FUTURE National Reso
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents 1. Introduction..
Page 5 and 6: List of tables and figures Tables T
Page 7 and 8: Figures Figure 1: Advanced projects
Page 9 and 10: 1. Introduction This paper outlines
Page 11: 2. Projects This chapter outlines m
Page 15 and 16: Marillana - WA Lake Maitland / JAUR
Page 17 and 18: NCIG export terminal (Newcastle Coa
Page 19 and 20: 3. Demand for labour and skills The
Page 21 and 22: The RBA suggested this large pipeli
Page 23 and 24: Demand for labour by year for proje
Page 25 and 26: Figure 6 shows Pit Crew’s total c
Page 27 and 28: Treasury expects export volumes wil
Page 29 and 30: electricians and fabrication engine
Page 31 and 32: On the basis of ESQ’s modelling,
Page 33 and 34: The number of people who leave jobs
Page 35 and 36: In its recent report prepared for S
Page 37 and 38: • After taking likely retirement
Page 39 and 40: Available data suggest while unempl
Page 41 and 42: Table 11 provides estimates of the
Page 43 and 44: Table 13 and Figure 11 show that un
Page 45 and 46: Figure 12: Projected growth in supp
Page 47 and 48: Overall, the resources sector’s s
Page 49 and 50: 4.3.3 Projected trends in higher ed
Page 51 and 52: Table 21: Number and percentage of
Page 53 and 54: 5. Where are the skills gaps? This
Page 55 and 56: 5.3 The potential for skills gaps T
Page 57 and 58: 5.6.3 Engineers Engineers Australia
Page 59 and 60: Treasury noted that as commercial p
Page 61 and 62: 5.8 Skills shortages are limited to
Page 63 and 64:
Table 26: Pit Crew Management Consu
Page 65 and 66:
5.9.2 Professions In the short term
Page 67 and 68:
Agricultural, Medical and Science T
Page 69 and 70:
Technicians and tradespeople 37,833
Page 71 and 72:
Appendix II—Detailed ABARE projec
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix III—Employed and unemplo
Page 75 and 76:
Appendix IV—Higher education Line
Page 77 and 78:
Completions and projections in sele
Page 79 and 80:
Share of employment by field of stu
Page 81 and 82:
Ongoing monitoring of the labour ma
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 16: Number of suitable appli
Page 85 and 86:
Table 37: Skill shortages in resour
Page 87 and 88:
2. Main Elements of the SERA DEEWR
Page 89 and 90:
SERA results SERA results are not i
Page 91 and 92:
Incomplete recruitment exercises In
Page 93 and 94:
National Resources Sector Employmen
Page 95 and 96:
Q1. What is the name of your compan
Page 97 and 98:
The next question is about how many
Page 99 and 100:
The next two questions (7 and 8) ar
Page 101 and 102:
Q9. What proportion of gross wages
Page 103 and 104:
Q15. Provide information on those o
Page 105 and 106:
Q19. How does your organisation mos
Page 107 and 108:
Thank you for taking the time to co
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix VII—Acronyms AAC ABARE A
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix VIII—References Access E
Page 113 and 114:
WA Department of Training and Workf
show all

National Resources Sector Employment Taskforce Technical Paper

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?