06.03.2014 Views

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CL/183/SR.1<br />

ANNEX XXXII<br />

SRI LANKA<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/12 - JAYALATH JAYAWARDENA<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/48 - D.M.S.B. DISSANAYAKE<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/49 - JOSEPH PARARAJASINGHAM<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/50 - GAJENDRAKUMAR PONNAMBALAM<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/51 - SELVARAJAH KAJENDREN<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/52 - SENATHIRAJAH JAYANANDAMOORTHY<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/53 - NADARAJAH RAVIRAJ<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/54 - SIVANATHAN KISHORE<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/55 - T. KANAGASABAI<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/56 - K. PATHMANATHAN<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/57 - THANGESWARI KATHIRAMAN<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/58 - P. ARIYANETHRAN<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/59 - C. CHANDRANEHRU<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/61 - THIYAGARAJAH MAHESWARAN<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/62 - MANO GANESAN<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/63 - D.M. DASSANAYAKE<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. SRI/64 - KIDDINAN SIVANESAN<br />

Resolution adopted unanimously by the IPU Governing Council at its 183 rd session<br />

(Geneva, 15 October 2008)<br />

The Governing Council of the <strong>Inter</strong>-<strong>Parliamentary</strong> <strong>Union</strong>,<br />

Referring to the cases of the parliamentarians listed above, as outlined in the report of the<br />

Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/183/12(b)-R.1), and to the resolutions adopted<br />

at its 182 nd session (April 2008) on the above cases, and having before it the case of Mr. Mano Ganesan,<br />

which has been the subject of a study and report of the Committee on the Human Rights of<br />

Parliamentarians following the Procedure for the treatment by the <strong>Inter</strong>-<strong>Parliamentary</strong> <strong>Union</strong> of<br />

communications concerning violations of the human rights of members of parliament,<br />

Having before it the written report of its delegation on the mission to Sri Lanka carried out<br />

in February 2008, including the observations provided on it by the authorities and the parliamentarians<br />

concerned,<br />

Taking account of the letter by the Acting Secretary General of Parliament of 8 August<br />

2008, forwarding a progress report on the cases in question established by the Police Headquarters, as<br />

well as of a further progress report forwarded by the Permanent Mission of the Democratic Socialist<br />

Republic of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office and other <strong>Inter</strong>national Organizations in Geneva on<br />

13 October 2008,<br />

Also taking account of the information provided by Dr. Jayawardena on the occasion of the<br />

119 th IPU Assembly,<br />

Considering the following new information and allegations on file:<br />

- regarding Dr. Jayawardena: on 10 June 2008, the Appeal Court allowed Dr. Jayawardena’s<br />

application for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the police authorities to provide him with a<br />

jeep or other suitable vehicle for as long as was warranted; according to the progress report<br />

established by the Police Headquarters, as of 2 July 2008 the police have provided<br />

Dr. Jayawardena with “a brand new vehicle from the fleet of the Police fleet”, which,<br />

according to Dr. Jayawardena, is a Tata Cab that cannot exceed 40 km/h; the Police<br />

Department has reportedly launched a malicious campaign to tarnish Dr. Jayawardena’s<br />

reputation and depict him as a pro-LTTE parliamentarian, which puts his life at great risk;<br />

he submitted a complaint to the National Police Commission and Parliament’s Privileges<br />

Committee, which is nevertheless without a Chairman at present and meetings have been<br />

indefinitely postponed; in addition, in August 2008, Dr. Jayawardena was prevented from<br />

performing a religious retreat at the Madhu Shrine for which permission had been granted<br />

to him since 1994; on 14 August 2008 he was ordered by Major General Lalith Daulagalla<br />

to leave the Church immediately as the Secretary of Defence had not granted permission<br />

for him to stay there, adding that he was an opposition member of parliament; the matter<br />

is now pending before the National Human Rights Commission;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!