CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CL/183/SR.1<br />
ANNEX IV<br />
<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. BGL/14 - SHAH AMS KIBRIA - BANGLADESH<br />
Resolution adopted unanimously by the IPU Governing Council at its 183 rd session<br />
(Geneva, 15 October 2008)<br />
The Governing Council of the <strong>Inter</strong>-<strong>Parliamentary</strong> <strong>Union</strong>,<br />
Referring to the case of Mr. Shah Ams Kibria, a member of the National Parliament of<br />
Bangladesh who was assassinated in January 2005, as outlined in the report of the Committee on the<br />
Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/183/12(b)-R.1), and to the resolution adopted at its 182 nd session<br />
(April 2008),<br />
Recalling that the investigation into the grenade attack of 27 January 2005 that took<br />
Mr. Kibria's life was closed in April 2006 despite petitions by Mr. Kibria’s family for further investigation,<br />
but reopened in March 2007 on the grounds that additional and significant information had emerged<br />
suggesting the involvement of other persons who had yet to be investigated; after a new investigating<br />
officer took over in May 2007 three Islamist militants belonging to the Horkatul Jihad al Islami (Huji),<br />
including their leader Mufti Abdul Hannan, were shown arrested in this case, as they had confessed to<br />
having collecting several grenades to eliminate Awami League leaders, including Mr. Shah Ams Kibria,<br />
Considering that, according to media reports of August 2008 forwarded by one of the<br />
sources in this case, Mufti Abdul Hannan and two of his co-accused have retracted their statements,<br />
affirming that they had been obtained under torture; the court reportedly accepted their retraction<br />
petitions,<br />
Recalling also that 10 suspects were initially arrested in this case; four of whom were<br />
allowed to retract their statements as they had been obtained under torture; the initial main accused,<br />
Mr. Quayum, who had not been allowed to retract his statement, was released on bail in September<br />
2008 and made public statements about how the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) had tortured<br />
him to extract a false confession,<br />
<strong>No</strong>ting lastly that Mr. Kibria’s family has received no further information on the<br />
investigation and is unaware of any scheduled court proceedings,<br />
Bearing in mind finally that Bangladesh is a party to the <strong>Inter</strong>national Covenant on Civil and<br />
Political Rights and to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment<br />
or Punishment,<br />
1. Deeply regrets that the authorities have failed to provide any information on the<br />
proceedings under way in this case;<br />
2. Recalls that the Bangladeshi authorities have a duty to identify and bring to justice those<br />
responsible for Mr. Kibria’s murder and to this effect to conduct a thorough, independent<br />
and diligent investigation; is led to consider that the failure of the authorities to provide<br />
official information on progress made in the investigation, in particular to Mr. Kibria’s<br />
family, coupled with the persistent allegations of torture in this case, sheds a harsh light on<br />
the administration of justice in this case;