CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 12 - CL/183/SR.1<br />
provide direct assistance for reconciliation and political dialogue. Dissemination and outreach<br />
activities had been allocated 13 per cent of resources, in order to promote the work of<br />
parliaments, particularly in the context of the United Nations.<br />
The budget contained a gender perspective, since efforts were being made to<br />
mainstream gender. All IPU Committees were therefore being asked to prepare and adopt a<br />
statement on how they intended to address that in their work. Gender programmes had been<br />
allocated five per cent of regular funding and 28 per cent of voluntary funding. The budget also<br />
indicated the gender representation in the secretariat, which showed that parity had not been<br />
achieved at the most senior level, but at all other levels there were more women than men in<br />
the Secretariat.<br />
The budget addressed the Organization’s environmental impact, in line with the<br />
campaign that the IPU had begun in 2007 to promote parliamentary action on climate change.<br />
The Organization’s carbon footprint was created by office heating, secretariat travel and<br />
Members’ travel. A 10 per cent reduction in emissions by 2012 pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol<br />
would be difficult to achieve, since the main source of the Organization’s carbon output was<br />
travel, and the goal of the Organization was to bring together the world’s parliamentarians to<br />
share information and discuss their experiences. The Organization’s carbon footprint could be<br />
reduced in part by increasing teleconferencing, which would reduce the need for staff travel.<br />
The IPU was committed to offsetting its environmental damage financially and to that end had<br />
set aside funds to support parliaments in advocacy on climate change.<br />
The consolidated budget was results-based and therefore contained indicators of<br />
expected outcomes. The expectations included increased membership of the Organization,<br />
new donors, the two statutory Assemblies for dialogue, 10 specialized meetings, 10 national<br />
and regional seminars, planning to prepare for the next speakers’ conference in 2010, peace<br />
missions and all work done on the promotion and protection of the human rights of<br />
parliamentarians, the promotion of women in politics, carbon neutrality, and improvement of<br />
access to meetings and events for persons with disabilities.<br />
The President announced that the discussion on the draft budget would be postponed<br />
until the Council’s second sitting, in order to give the geopolitical groups enough time to<br />
discuss the draft, and formulate their comments.<br />
It was so decided.<br />
Item 6 of the agenda<br />
FINANCIAL SITUATION OF THE IPU<br />
(CL/183/6-R.1)<br />
The Secretary General said that the income up to 30 September had been received<br />
from assessed contributions, which had been invoiced at the beginning of 2008. Nine new<br />
Members had been affiliated or reaffiliated, and their assessed contributions had also been<br />
recorded as revenue. Other revenue had come from the internal assessment of staff salaries,<br />
conditional grants from funding agencies and the Working Capital Fund. When the IPU budget<br />
for 2008 had been adopted, the United States dollar had been trading at CHF 1.17. That<br />
figure had fallen drastically by April 2008. That dramatic change had impacted on IPU<br />
spending, since all operating costs denominated in dollars had been reduced, resulting in a<br />
considerable saving over the first six months of 2008. The 118 th Assembly in Cape Town had<br />
been carried out within the approved budget appropriation. Predicted expenditure for the year<br />
was below the approved budget, owing to a shortfall in donor funding. Donors must be<br />
confident in the ability of the Organization to deliver functioning projects and programmes.