06.03.2014 Views

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 12 - CL/183/SR.1<br />

provide direct assistance for reconciliation and political dialogue. Dissemination and outreach<br />

activities had been allocated 13 per cent of resources, in order to promote the work of<br />

parliaments, particularly in the context of the United Nations.<br />

The budget contained a gender perspective, since efforts were being made to<br />

mainstream gender. All IPU Committees were therefore being asked to prepare and adopt a<br />

statement on how they intended to address that in their work. Gender programmes had been<br />

allocated five per cent of regular funding and 28 per cent of voluntary funding. The budget also<br />

indicated the gender representation in the secretariat, which showed that parity had not been<br />

achieved at the most senior level, but at all other levels there were more women than men in<br />

the Secretariat.<br />

The budget addressed the Organization’s environmental impact, in line with the<br />

campaign that the IPU had begun in 2007 to promote parliamentary action on climate change.<br />

The Organization’s carbon footprint was created by office heating, secretariat travel and<br />

Members’ travel. A 10 per cent reduction in emissions by 2012 pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol<br />

would be difficult to achieve, since the main source of the Organization’s carbon output was<br />

travel, and the goal of the Organization was to bring together the world’s parliamentarians to<br />

share information and discuss their experiences. The Organization’s carbon footprint could be<br />

reduced in part by increasing teleconferencing, which would reduce the need for staff travel.<br />

The IPU was committed to offsetting its environmental damage financially and to that end had<br />

set aside funds to support parliaments in advocacy on climate change.<br />

The consolidated budget was results-based and therefore contained indicators of<br />

expected outcomes. The expectations included increased membership of the Organization,<br />

new donors, the two statutory Assemblies for dialogue, 10 specialized meetings, 10 national<br />

and regional seminars, planning to prepare for the next speakers’ conference in 2010, peace<br />

missions and all work done on the promotion and protection of the human rights of<br />

parliamentarians, the promotion of women in politics, carbon neutrality, and improvement of<br />

access to meetings and events for persons with disabilities.<br />

The President announced that the discussion on the draft budget would be postponed<br />

until the Council’s second sitting, in order to give the geopolitical groups enough time to<br />

discuss the draft, and formulate their comments.<br />

It was so decided.<br />

Item 6 of the agenda<br />

FINANCIAL SITUATION OF THE IPU<br />

(CL/183/6-R.1)<br />

The Secretary General said that the income up to 30 September had been received<br />

from assessed contributions, which had been invoiced at the beginning of 2008. Nine new<br />

Members had been affiliated or reaffiliated, and their assessed contributions had also been<br />

recorded as revenue. Other revenue had come from the internal assessment of staff salaries,<br />

conditional grants from funding agencies and the Working Capital Fund. When the IPU budget<br />

for 2008 had been adopted, the United States dollar had been trading at CHF 1.17. That<br />

figure had fallen drastically by April 2008. That dramatic change had impacted on IPU<br />

spending, since all operating costs denominated in dollars had been reduced, resulting in a<br />

considerable saving over the first six months of 2008. The 118 th Assembly in Cape Town had<br />

been carried out within the approved budget appropriation. Predicted expenditure for the year<br />

was below the approved budget, owing to a shortfall in donor funding. Donors must be<br />

confident in the ability of the Organization to deliver functioning projects and programmes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!