CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 2 - CL/183/SR.1<br />
ANNEX XXXII<br />
- regarding Mr. Mano Ganesan: the back-up vehicle provided to Mr. Ganesan following the<br />
Committee’s mission had technical defects but, according to the authorities, has been<br />
repaired in the meantime; moreover, a State-sponsored campaign of slander has<br />
reportedly been launched against Mr. Ganesan to discredit him and his work on enforced<br />
disappearances in Sri Lanka and, on 2 September 2008, he was summoned for questioning<br />
by the Director of the Terrorist Investigation Division, who questioned him for nearly seven<br />
hours in connection with peace visits to Killinochi he carried out during the period of the<br />
Cease Fire Agreement from 2002 to 2005 and questioned him about an alleged special<br />
relationship with the LTTE; that since then, stories in relation to the questioning which was<br />
conducted in private in the absence of even Mr. Ganesan’s lawyer, are reportedly being<br />
planted in the media very systematically, and that the Sinhala media were carrying news<br />
items on him which were of a criminal nature, increasing the risk to his security, and that<br />
he feels singled out as a human rights defender, an ethnic Tamil parliamentarian and a<br />
democratic political party leader belonging to the opposition alliance;<br />
- regarding Mr. Chandranehru: according to Mr. Chandranehru, the person who attacked<br />
him during a visit to his constituency in June 2007 was Mr. Iniyabarathy, alias<br />
Kumarasuwamy Pushpakumar; he reported that that person was appointed coordinator for<br />
President Rajapakse in Ampara District and received his credentials from the President on<br />
25 May 2008; Mr. Iniyabarathy and his group reportedly continue to threaten<br />
Mr. Chandranehru’s supporters and constituents in an attempt to have them break off<br />
contact with him; according to the source, Mr. Chandranehru can indeed no longer travel<br />
to his constituency for fear of his safety; Mr. Chandranehru has raised the matter as a<br />
privilege issue and complained to the Inspector General of Police, the Attorney General<br />
and the Speaker, reportedly to no avail; according to the police progress report,<br />
Mr. Chandranehru has been provided with additional security; the police investigation<br />
points to one “Parathy” as the likely culprit; an identification parade took place before the<br />
Akkaraipattu Magistrate Court on 16 September 2008 when a suspect was indeed<br />
identified; however, the court ordered him to appear upon notice;<br />
- regarding the cases of Mr. Raviraj and Mr. Maheswaran, killed on 10 <strong>No</strong>vember 2006 and<br />
1 January 2008, respectively: according to the police progress report, the case of<br />
Mr. Raviraj was to be called on 16 September 2008, and in the case of Mr. Maheswaran,<br />
the Attorney General filed an indictment and the case was to be called on 19 August 2008<br />
for the service of indictment and listing for hearing; no information regarding the outcome<br />
of the hearings in either case has been provided;<br />
- regarding the case of Mr. Dassanayake, killed on 8 January 2008: according to the police<br />
progress report, police inquiries have led to the arrest on 10 June 2008 of a suspect with<br />
links to the LTTE who divulged vital incriminating material relevant to Mr. Dassanayake’s<br />
assassination; the case is registered before the Magistrate Court of Kanuwana and will be<br />
called again on 5 <strong>No</strong>vember 2008;<br />
- regarding the case of Mr. D.M.S.B. Dissanayake: on 22 July 2008, the Human Rights<br />
Committee set up by virtue of the <strong>Inter</strong>national Covenant on Civil and Political Rights<br />
expressed the view 26 that the State of Sri Lanka had violated Mr. Dissanayake’s rights<br />
under Article 9 (1), Article 19, and Article 25 (b) of the <strong>Inter</strong>national Covenant on Civil and<br />
Political Rights and was therefore under an obligation to provide him with an adequate<br />
remedy, including compensation and the restoration of his right to vote and stand for<br />
election and to make such changes to the law and practice as necessary to avoid similar<br />
violations in the future,<br />
26 CCPR/C/93/D/1373/2005.