06.03.2014 Views

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 2 - CL/183/SR.1<br />

ANNEX XXXII<br />

- regarding Mr. Mano Ganesan: the back-up vehicle provided to Mr. Ganesan following the<br />

Committee’s mission had technical defects but, according to the authorities, has been<br />

repaired in the meantime; moreover, a State-sponsored campaign of slander has<br />

reportedly been launched against Mr. Ganesan to discredit him and his work on enforced<br />

disappearances in Sri Lanka and, on 2 September 2008, he was summoned for questioning<br />

by the Director of the Terrorist Investigation Division, who questioned him for nearly seven<br />

hours in connection with peace visits to Killinochi he carried out during the period of the<br />

Cease Fire Agreement from 2002 to 2005 and questioned him about an alleged special<br />

relationship with the LTTE; that since then, stories in relation to the questioning which was<br />

conducted in private in the absence of even Mr. Ganesan’s lawyer, are reportedly being<br />

planted in the media very systematically, and that the Sinhala media were carrying news<br />

items on him which were of a criminal nature, increasing the risk to his security, and that<br />

he feels singled out as a human rights defender, an ethnic Tamil parliamentarian and a<br />

democratic political party leader belonging to the opposition alliance;<br />

- regarding Mr. Chandranehru: according to Mr. Chandranehru, the person who attacked<br />

him during a visit to his constituency in June 2007 was Mr. Iniyabarathy, alias<br />

Kumarasuwamy Pushpakumar; he reported that that person was appointed coordinator for<br />

President Rajapakse in Ampara District and received his credentials from the President on<br />

25 May 2008; Mr. Iniyabarathy and his group reportedly continue to threaten<br />

Mr. Chandranehru’s supporters and constituents in an attempt to have them break off<br />

contact with him; according to the source, Mr. Chandranehru can indeed no longer travel<br />

to his constituency for fear of his safety; Mr. Chandranehru has raised the matter as a<br />

privilege issue and complained to the Inspector General of Police, the Attorney General<br />

and the Speaker, reportedly to no avail; according to the police progress report,<br />

Mr. Chandranehru has been provided with additional security; the police investigation<br />

points to one “Parathy” as the likely culprit; an identification parade took place before the<br />

Akkaraipattu Magistrate Court on 16 September 2008 when a suspect was indeed<br />

identified; however, the court ordered him to appear upon notice;<br />

- regarding the cases of Mr. Raviraj and Mr. Maheswaran, killed on 10 <strong>No</strong>vember 2006 and<br />

1 January 2008, respectively: according to the police progress report, the case of<br />

Mr. Raviraj was to be called on 16 September 2008, and in the case of Mr. Maheswaran,<br />

the Attorney General filed an indictment and the case was to be called on 19 August 2008<br />

for the service of indictment and listing for hearing; no information regarding the outcome<br />

of the hearings in either case has been provided;<br />

- regarding the case of Mr. Dassanayake, killed on 8 January 2008: according to the police<br />

progress report, police inquiries have led to the arrest on 10 June 2008 of a suspect with<br />

links to the LTTE who divulged vital incriminating material relevant to Mr. Dassanayake’s<br />

assassination; the case is registered before the Magistrate Court of Kanuwana and will be<br />

called again on 5 <strong>No</strong>vember 2008;<br />

- regarding the case of Mr. D.M.S.B. Dissanayake: on 22 July 2008, the Human Rights<br />

Committee set up by virtue of the <strong>Inter</strong>national Covenant on Civil and Political Rights<br />

expressed the view 26 that the State of Sri Lanka had violated Mr. Dissanayake’s rights<br />

under Article 9 (1), Article 19, and Article 25 (b) of the <strong>Inter</strong>national Covenant on Civil and<br />

Political Rights and was therefore under an obligation to provide him with an adequate<br />

remedy, including compensation and the restoration of his right to vote and stand for<br />

election and to make such changes to the law and practice as necessary to avoid similar<br />

violations in the future,<br />

26 CCPR/C/93/D/1373/2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!