CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CL/183/SR.1<br />
ANNEX XXXIII<br />
<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. TK/39 - LEYLA ZANA ) TURKEY<br />
<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. TK/41 - HATIP DICLE )<br />
<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. TK/51 - ORHAN DOGAN 27 )<br />
<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. TK/52 - SELIM SADAK )<br />
<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>No</strong>. TK/55 - MEHMET SINÇAR )<br />
Resolution adopted unanimously by the IPU Governing Council at its 183 rd session<br />
(Geneva, 15 October 2008)<br />
The Governing Council of the <strong>Inter</strong>-<strong>Parliamentary</strong> <strong>Union</strong>,<br />
Referring to the case of Ms. Leyla Zana, Mr. Hatip Dicle, Mr. Orhan Dogan, Mr. Selim<br />
Sadak and Mr. Mehmet Sinçar, former members of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, as outlined<br />
in the report of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/183/12(b)-R.1), and to the<br />
resolution adopted at its 182 nd session (April 2008),<br />
Taking account of the letter from the President of the Turkish <strong>Inter</strong>-<strong>Parliamentary</strong> Group,<br />
dated 12 October 2008,<br />
Recalling the following: Ms. Zana, Mr. Dicle, Mr. Dogan and Mr. Sadak were sentenced in<br />
December 1994 to a 15-year prison term for being members of an armed organization; on 26 June<br />
2001, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that they had not enjoyed a fair trial; the retrial before<br />
the Ankara State Security Court, which upheld the conviction, was quashed by the Court of Cassation,<br />
which ruled that their right to a fair trial had again not been respected and ordered a second retrial; at<br />
the closure of this second retrial in March 2007, the 11 th High Criminal Court of Ankara sentenced<br />
Ms. Zana, Mr. Dicle, Mr. Dogan and Mr. Sadak to seven years and six months in prison under Article 5<br />
of Anti-Terrorism Law 3713 (prohibition on praising terrorism) and Article 314 (2) of the Turkish Penal<br />
Code (punishing membership of an illegal organization) as opposed to the original 15-year prison<br />
sentence, of which they had served 10 years; the second retrial was reportedly also flawed, in particular<br />
owing to the destruction of important exonerating evidence, and an application was therefore filed in<br />
the Court of Cassation; noting that on 27 February 2008 the Court handed down its ruling upholding the<br />
verdict of the 11 th High Criminal Court of Ankara,<br />
Recalling the following: Mr. Sinçar was assassinated in September 1993 in circumstances<br />
suggesting an extrajudicial execution; in January 2005, the then Turkish Minister of Justice affirmed that<br />
the killing had been carried out by members of the Hezbollah terrorist organization, an accusation which<br />
that group reportedly refuted; in October 1993 twelve persons were accused, two of whom were at<br />
large; in <strong>No</strong>vember 1994, all but those two suspects were acquitted for want of evidence; in April 1996,<br />
the then Minister of Justice stated that the identity of the murderer had been established but that he was<br />
living in the Islamic Republic of Iran; according to the information provided by the President of the<br />
Turkish IPU Group in January and April 2008, a criminal case regarding the murder of Mr. Sinçar was<br />
pending before the 6 th Assize Court in Diyarbakir and hearings had been scheduled for 21 February and<br />
8 May 2008; Mrs. Sinçar is, however, reportedly unaware of those proceedings; noting in this respect<br />
that, in his letter of 12 October 2008, the President of the Turkish IPU Group reported the following:<br />
the indictment prepared by the Diyarbakir State Security Court dated 24 May 2000 (2000/59) contains<br />
no information about a complainant; the review of the investigation documents and documents<br />
pertaining to the legal proceedings show that neither Mr. Sinçar’s wife nor any relative was consulted as<br />
witness, that no notice was sent to Mrs. Sinçar, and that neither she nor any relative was informed of the<br />
proceedings or applied as “intervener” (civil party),<br />
27 Mr. Orhan Dogan died on 29 June 2007.