CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 29 - CL/183/SR.1<br />
in the immediate future. It was also disappointing that the parliamentary working group that<br />
had been established to see how the investigation could be revived had not been able to<br />
function. The Committee was confident that the latest expression of support from the Speaker<br />
of the Parliament of Burundi would rectify that.<br />
Mr. D. Kiganahe (Burundi) said that his delegation had noted the resolutions pertaining<br />
to Burundi and thanked the Committee for having taken the time to hear additional<br />
information. He recalled that the cases before the Committee, particularly those regarding the<br />
deaths of certain parliamentarians, were the result of some 10 years of warfare in Burundi.<br />
Others had also died, but complaints had not been filed. The cases would be dealt with<br />
satisfactorily in the context of the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which was<br />
currently being established in cooperation with the United Nations. He recalled that the cases<br />
before the Committee reflected the fragile nature of the situation of the parliamentarians of<br />
Burundi. He wished to inform the Governing Council that the National Assembly and the<br />
authorities of Burundi were committed to continuing dialogue with the IPU to strengthen<br />
national institutions and democracy in Burundi. The authorities were prepared to welcome an<br />
IPU mission to help the Committee obtain first hand information on all those cases.<br />
The Governing Council unanimously adopted the three draft resolutions relating to<br />
the case of Mr. S. Mfayokurera, Mr. I. Ndikumana, Mr. G. Gahungu, Ms. L. Ntamutumba,<br />
Mr. P. Sirahenda and Mr. G. Gisabwamana, to the case of Mr. <strong>No</strong>rbert Ndihokubwayo,<br />
and to the case of 22 parliamentarians, which had been submitted to it by the Committee<br />
on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians. 6<br />
Colombia<br />
In respect of Colombia, five of the six former Congress members who had been in the<br />
hands of Colombia’s main guerrilla group FARC had been released, as had Ingrid Bettancourt<br />
and 14 other hostages who had been held by the group. The Committee remained concerned<br />
about Mr. Oscar Lizcano, the only former Congressman who remained in FARC hands, whose<br />
health had seriously deteriorated. Efforts to obtain his release and the swift conclusion of a<br />
humanitarian agreement leading to the release of all hostages held by FARC should be pursued<br />
with resolve. In the case of the seven parliamentarians who belonged to the Patriotic <strong>Union</strong><br />
party, who had been assassinated or forced into exile, the <strong>Inter</strong>-American Commission on<br />
Human Rights had sent its preliminary conclusions to the Colombian Government. The<br />
Committee urged that the Government should take all the necessary actions to ensure that<br />
justice was done and would continue to follow the proceedings before the <strong>Inter</strong>-American<br />
Commission on Human Rights and the <strong>Inter</strong>-American Court.<br />
Security was a real concern for many Colombian Congressmen, such as Mr. Wilson<br />
Borja. The only viable solution in such cases was to combine protection and action to identify<br />
and punish the culprits. The Committee therefore urged the authorities to address the serious<br />
concerns about his security details, and the actual enforcement of the prison sentences handed<br />
down against those who had been responsible for the attack on his life in 2000. Mr. Borja was<br />
being prosecuted for alleged links with FARC. The Committee was concerned about the highly<br />
polarized climate in Colombia, in which some did not hesitate to label him "guilty" without<br />
proof. It was essential that his rights should be fully respected during the course of the<br />
investigation and proceedings.<br />
In the case of former Congressman Jorge Tadeo Lozano Osorio, while the Committee<br />
had been initially concerned about the fundamentally flawed proceedings to which he had<br />
been subjected, it was becoming increasingly worried about his security and that of his family.<br />
In July 2008 his son had been shot dead in the streets of Medellin. The Committee called on<br />
6 See Annexes VII to IX for the texts of the resolutions.