CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
CASE No - Inter-Parliamentary Union
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 23 - CL/183/SR.1<br />
(b)<br />
Situation of certain Members<br />
(CL/183/3(b)-P.2)<br />
The President said that during the first sitting of the current session, he had informed the<br />
Governing Council that the Parliaments of Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua were defaulting in their<br />
payments to the IPU. Since that time, a payment had been received from the Parliament of<br />
Nicaragua, which although it remained in arrears, was no longer liable for suspension.<br />
Document CL/183/3(b)-P.2 contained a decision to suspend the Parliament of Kyrgyzstan. The<br />
Secretariat had been informed that Kyrgyzstan intended to pay its dues forthwith, and he<br />
therefore suggested that the decision to suspend its membership should be withheld. If no<br />
payment was received, the decision on Kyrgyzstan’s suspension would come into force by the<br />
end of 2008.<br />
It was so decided.<br />
Item 8 of the agenda<br />
COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM<br />
(CL/183/8-R.1, 8-P.1 and P.2)<br />
The President announced that document CL/183/8-R.1 contained a list of activities that<br />
had been undertaken in cooperation with the United Nations over the past six months. It was<br />
a comprehensive and diverse list, which testified to the remarkable expansion of the work that<br />
the IPU conducted in cooperation with the United Nations. The Governing Council also had<br />
before it a draft resolution on cooperation between the United Nations and the IPU<br />
(CL/183/8-P.1). Once that resolution was adopted, it was important that Members should<br />
lobby their respective governments so that their Ambassadors in New York received the<br />
necessary instructions to support the resolution. All documents adopted by the General<br />
Assembly of the United Nations were discussed in diplomatic missions. Those missions should<br />
also be made aware of the work of the IPU. Members of the IPU must report back to their<br />
parliaments on the work done during statutory assemblies, in order to create a link between<br />
the meetings of the IPU and the work of parliaments at the national level.<br />
The Secretary General said that, on the question of cooperation with the United Nations<br />
system, the Governing Council had before it a list of activities undertaken between 19 April<br />
and 12 October 2008, which included meetings in New York, regional meetings and activities<br />
with United Nations bodies in national parliaments. It focussed primarily on work on<br />
development, and it also referred to work conducted in cooperation with specialized agencies<br />
of the United Nations, such as the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the<br />
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the United Nations<br />
Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), and others. One of the many activities of<br />
the IPU was to promote the attainment of the MDGs, and during its 118 th Assembly in Cape<br />
Town, South Africa, in April 2008 the IPU had undertaken an activity in cooperation with the<br />
Countdown to 2015 Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival initiative. The draft resolution on<br />
cooperation with the United Nations built on the recommendations of the United Nations<br />
Secretary-General, from his report to the General Assembly. The draft resolution pointed to<br />
further possibilities for strengthening cooperation between the two organizations, since much<br />
could be done to build a mutually reinforcing and strategic partnership. It was also important<br />
that the Member States of the United Nations should place greater focus on the relationship<br />
between their national parliaments and the United Nations. The IPU would suggest that the