08.03.2014 Views

Consultation Statement - Islington Council

Consultation Statement - Islington Council

Consultation Statement - Islington Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Direction of Travel consultation<br />

Applications should be<br />

assessed on a site-by-site<br />

basis.<br />

Some developers are<br />

concerned that the marketing<br />

requirement is too onerous.<br />

Lazari investments consider<br />

that the Archway should allow<br />

more flexibility for<br />

non-business employment<br />

uses. Core Strategy Policy CS<br />

demonstrated by marketing.<br />

The policy has some flexibility<br />

whilst giving protection for<br />

business floorspace that could<br />

perform a useful function, but<br />

which may be lost due to<br />

higher rental and sales values<br />

of some other uses. The<br />

council has a responsibility to<br />

plan for economic growth and<br />

the loss of business space<br />

without consideration of<br />

demand over a good period of<br />

1 is referred to. Cushman and time would be contrary to this.<br />

Wakefield have referred to the<br />

relationship between site<br />

allocations and DM 32.<br />

Workspace Group objected to<br />

DM 32 and stated that higher<br />

employment densities and<br />

home-working mean a reduced<br />

need for office space.<br />

Residential is needed in some<br />

cases to increase viability of<br />

employment uses.<br />

GLA support DM 32 but<br />

suggest that the reference to<br />

mix of uses including retail<br />

should be clearer in supporting<br />

text.<br />

Craft Central support the<br />

protection of existing<br />

employment space. Henerson<br />

Global Investors support DM<br />

32 A.<br />

Drivers Jonas Deloitte consider<br />

that employment numbers are<br />

more relevant than floorspace.<br />

The policy also allows<br />

reprovision of floorspace where<br />

the condition of existing<br />

floorspace is not attractive to<br />

potential occupiers.<br />

CS 1 states that the Archway<br />

core site should be a<br />

mixed-use site that retains a<br />

significant proportion of office<br />

space, alongside other uses.<br />

DM 32 allows for a mix of uses.<br />

Due to forecast population and<br />

employment growth, even with<br />

more efficient use of floorspace<br />

in some circumstances, new<br />

floorspace and the protection<br />

of existing floorspace is<br />

important to the economic<br />

sustainability of the borough.<br />

The policy allows for a mix of<br />

uses.<br />

Mix of uses is clearer referred<br />

to. Text has been revised for<br />

Submission version.<br />

See comment in relation to<br />

Issues and Options<br />

consultation.<br />

Development Management Policies: Regulation 25 <strong>Consultation</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Islington</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!