Policy Framework - Jacksonville Transportation Authority

More documents

Recommendations

Info

103rd St Garden St Crystal Springs Rd Prichard Rd Collins Rd Wilson Blvd Dunn Ave Park St San Juan Blvd Kingsley Ave Bowden Rd Arlington Expy Zoo Parkway Old St Augustine Rd Southside Blvd Baymeadows Rd Heckscher Dr J Turner Butler Beach Blvd City of Jacksonville Policy Framework for Transit-Oriented Development Creating a Virtual Future – Evaluating TOD Potential A virtual future was created to test the future buildout potential of different TOD policies. The steps in this process involved identifying the location of future transit hubs (stations areas), and assigning them one of eight station area, or one of two corridor TOD place types. A typology map of TOD Place Types is shown in Figure 6. Station areas were assigned to a half-mile area, or buffer, around each hub. The corridors between the hubs were either assigned an urban corridor, or a suburban corridor place type based depending on where that corridor intersected with Jacksonville’s 2030 Mobility Plan development area designation (Central Business; Urban Priority, Suburban Priority, see Figure 3 in the Policy Framework). Each TOD place making element has associated with it a density and intensity intention for the policy framework. The density/intensity values are shown in Table 11. The average dwelling units/acre and employment/acre for each TOD place type is typically given as a variable range, but for purposes of this buildout an exact figure was adopted. The place making elements were composed and allocated to study area parcels in GIS using CorPlan - a land use evaluation and allocation tool. The density/intensity values shown in Table 11 were applied only to study parcels determined to be vacant or redevelopable to some degree. A map of the TOD place type allocation to study area vacant and redevelopment parcels is shown in Figure 7. Areas that were vacant or that had high redevelopment potential received 100% of the TOD potential jobs and houses. Areas of medium redevelopment potential received 66% of the full TOD buildout, and areas of low redevelopment potential received 33%. In addition, any developable parcel TOD Place Making Elements Allocated to Vacant/Redevelopable Parcels S1 Campus S2 Town Center 95 S3 Village Ye low Blu f Rd S4 Suburban Neighborhood SC Suburban Corridor U1 Downtown Starre t Rd Lem Turner Rd U2 Urban Center U3 Main Street New Berlin Rd U4 Urban Neighborhood UC Urban Corridor 1 295 9A TOD Study Area Kings Rd Monument Rd Beaver St 90 Atlantic Blvd Atlantic Blvd 10 Normandy Blvd 17 St Johns River 295 9A San Jose Blvd 95 Old Middleburg Rd Hood Rd 1 17 95 0 5 Miles A-14 | Appendix A: Analysis of TOD Potential Figure 7: TOD Place Types Allocated to Vacant/Redevelopable Parcels
City of Jacksonville Policy Framework for Transit-Oriented Development that qualified for the residential-neighborhood 'Scale Transition' protection had the development potential reduced by 15%. The definition of parcels qualifying for this residential-neighborhood, “scaled transition” protection comes from the City of Jacksonville Comprehensive plan, “In order to maintain and enhance existing residential enclaves and low density residential areas, the commercial, industrial, Medium Density Residential, and High Density Residential future land use category descriptions shall include provisions for general neighborhood protection.” Table 12 shows the potential for new dwelling units and jobs within the total area for each TOD place type within the study area. Table 13 shows the total acres for each TOD place type, the jobs/housing ratio for each and the potential dwelling units per acre and employees per acre that could be achieved with the TOD areas. TOD Place Type Dwellings Percent of Total Jobs Percent of Total S1 Campus 0 0% 49,029 6% S2 Town Center 32,373 11% 116,499 14% S3 Village 26,506 9% 54,764 7% S4 Suburban Neighborhood 7,435 2% 9,892 1% SC Suburban Corridor 85,234 28% 113,409 14% U1 Downtown 26,026 9% 164,351 20% U2 Urban Center 16,800 6% 126,330 16% U3 Main Street 24,290 8% 92,203 11% U4 Urban Neighborhood 7,253 2% 7,304 1% UC Urban Corridor 74,262 25% 74,792 9% Total 300,178 808,573 Table 12: Potential New Dwelling Units and Jobs by Place Type TOD Place Type Acres (Vac/Redev) Percent of Total Jobs/Housing Ratio DU/Acre EMP/Acre S1 Campus 578 2% na 0.0 84.8 S2 Town Center 1,263 5% 1.34 25.6 92.2 S3 Village 2,870 11% 0.77 9.2 19.1 S4 Suburban Neighborhood 997 4% 0.49 7.5 9.9 SC Suburban Corridor 11,404 43% 0.49 7.5 9.9 U1 Downtown 607 2% 2.34 42.9 270.9 U2 Urban Center 882 3% 2.79 19.1 143.3 U3 Main Street 1,829 7% 1.41 13.3 50.4 U4 Urban Neighborhood 5,443 21% 0.37 13.6 13.7 UC Urban Corridor 574 2% 0.37 12.6 12.7 Total 26,447 2.69 Table 13: Potential Acres Developed by Place Type Appendix A: Analysis of TOD Potential | A-15
Page 1:
A Policy Framework for Transit-Orie
Page 5: Table of Contents
Page 8 and 9: City of Jacksonville Policy Framewo
Page 11: City of Jacksonville Policy Framewo
Page 19 and 20: I-10 I-10 BEAVER ST I-10 CRYSTAL SP
Page 31 and 32: 103rd St Garden St Crystal Springs
Page 39: Appendix A
Page 58: City of Jacksonville Policy Framewo
show all

Policy Framework - Jacksonville Transportation Authority

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?